You won't silence me.
The IG report is coming and this frame job is falling apart.
Isnt planting an FBI spy inside the Trump campaign the same as the electronic spying that went on in Watergate??
I fail to see much difference. And I'm not buying the "we put him there to protect Trump" excuse:
Steele had a UK Intelligence Officer with specificity to Russia. What do you think Intelligence Officers do whether from here or the UK or from anywhere else. Do you think he was dropping guys in bowler hats that stopped for tea at 4:00pm into Russia? That would have been a great way to get people killed.
I will say it again because is so easy to use the same response over and over. Either you people are obtuse beyond belief or you simply don't care.
That's a nice circumlocution. I ask you again. Are the Russians allies? If it's a horrible crime for Trump to have supposedly colluded with the Russians, why is it OK for Steele and the Democrats to have trusted their information? Obtuse is thinking one is terrible and the other is OK.
You just evaded my point. Should Hillary then also not be in jail for conspiring with a British MI6 agent when she obtained the Steele dossier??If you want this investigation to come to an end, urge the trump administration to come clean about everything they know. But if they continue to force investigators and investigative journalists to ferret out the truth then this is going to get dragged out for a very long time
It does not matter what Steele trusted or not. It only matters that the FBI corroborated what they used from other sources. Steele himself has suggested that the odds on the salacious "Trump Hotel Room" is 50% and the FBI did not move on any of that. In fact, Comey would not move on it when Trump asked him to move on it because it had not been corroborated and hence there was nothing to move on.
You folks have a half answer for everything.
When trump does it its collusion, when Demorats do it its called "opposition research"That's a nice circumlocution. I ask you again. Are the Russians allies? If it's a horrible crime for Trump to have supposedly colluded with the Russians, why is it OK for Steele and the Democrats to have trusted their information? Obtuse is thinking one is terrible and the other is OK
If you’re content with trump not being forthcoming about his connections to Russian interests then you’ll have to be content with the investigation dragging on.
Still evading my question
Lets forget aboot Trump for a second and lets focus solely on Hillary. Here's my question again:Your question is irrelevant. So long as trump leaves it to investigators and journalists to ferret out the truth, then the mueller investigation will continue on. If trump decided to be completely honest today then mueller could end his investigation before the end of the week
You mean for Trump to make some mia culpa where nothing exists. Trump having had business dealings either with Russians or in Russia prior to his running for President has nothing to do with anything. This investigation that has now spread its tentacles everywhere in a desperate quest to find something is a disgrace. The point of the investigation was to find out whether there had been collusion with the Russian government, period. Instead we're off on who paid Stormy Daniels. Nobody gives a damn except desperate Democrats.
Why should we trust anything derived from Russian sources?
If his connections to Russian interests don’t matter then he should be completely forthcoming instead of lying at every turn. But as he and everyone around him has gone with the lying option, well, here we are.
It's much worse than Watergate. Watergate resulted from a bunch of amateurs breaking into the DNC and Nixon trying to protect them afterwards. This is a weaponization of the FBI and/or intelligence services to try to dig up dirt on a political opponent to destroy his campaign and elect your candidate. That effort has continued post-election to try and remove Trump from office once the initial effort failed.