German guy
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 5,187
- Reaction score
- 4,255
- Location
- Berlin, Germany
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
If so, then we could use an upgrade. Like, make it so we can jump 6 times higher, and take 100 bullets to kill.
Actually, just give that to me.
Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
It must be the most boring simulation ever.
It must have been built by the most boring entities ever which is doubtful. Nobody with the intelligence of creating a simulation on such a scale would make it so boring. Only nature is capable of such.
It must be the most boring simulation ever.
It must have been built by the most boring entities ever which is doubtful. Nobody with the intelligence of creating a simulation on such a scale would make it so boring. Only nature is capable of such.
Not our universe, just you. You only "think" the rest of us and the universe really exist. Ponder that.Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
Bad coder I suspect.Er... reality is much too arbitrary to be programmed.
Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
The answer to life, the universe and everything is wait for it................................................................................................42. Yep 42. Now for the question that needs to be asked, well we need a much bigger computer. By the way you are being observed by mice. You know, the white ones used in laboratories.
Somewhere, I read that some scientists allegedly broke their heads over this question. Some even attempted to calculate the probability for our universe being a computer simulation.
Do you know more about these ideas? Are they just yellow press pseudo-science ideas, or is there a serious debate about that?
Do you think it's possible we're just inside some huge simulation?
If yes, do you think it matters?
Google. One way or the other she will be naked.is there still a cheat to make Lara croft naked?
Are You Living in a Simulation?
VII. CONCLUSION
A technologically mature “posthuman” civilization would have enormous computing power. Based on this empirical fact, the simulation argument shows that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage is very close to zero; (2) The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero; (3) The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one.
If (1) is true, then we will almost certainly go extinct before reaching posthumanity. If (2) is true, then there must be a strong convergence among the courses of advanced civilizations so that virtually none contains any relatively wealthy individuals who desire to run ancestor-simulations and are free to do so. If (3) is true, then we almost certainly live in a simulation. In the dark forest of our current ignorance, it seems sensible to apportion one’s credence roughly evenly between (1), (2), and (3).
Unless we are now living in a simulation, our descendants will almost certainly never run an ancestor-simulation.
This is just pie-eyed transhumanist balderdash. A "post human" stage is inevitable, as either humans will evolve into new species or go extinct. Assuming that time continues to march on past the existence of homo sapiens, post humanity is inevitable. That a "post human" society is necessarily a "singularity," or some other sort silly sci-fi futurist fantasy, is by no means inevitable, however. And the fact that an advanced civilization may run an "ancestor simulation," even if it does happen, does not entail that we are part of such a simulation. This sort of trash is just a bastardized Doomsday Argument, which is itself flawed.
Transhumanists remind me of religious fanatics. They are willing to believe the stupidest things.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?