Is everyone a little bit gay?

[as if]

They have rehab for that...

I am a firm believer in intervention by and of one's self.

It brings a far better far faster less tramautic means to an end in many ways.

The so called Doctorate methods are ignorant, self deluded, and heartless.

Not that everyone is able or should even attempt recovery from an addiction on thier own, some show they are incapable in one way or another. Overdose is possible in this manner, as well as death. The mere withdrawal of a drug one is addicted to can cause death.

I am also a believer in the various "things" sex can do without distoring it's function when done solo.

 

[Redress]

I am a firm believer in intervention by and of one's self.

It brings a far better far faster less tramautic means to an end in many ways.

The so called Doctorate methods are ignorant, self deluded, and heartless.

Not that everyone is able or should even attempt recovery from an addiction on thier own, some show they are incapable in one way or another. Overdose is possible in this manner, as well as death. The mere withdrawal of a drug one is addicted to can cause death.

I am also a believer in the various "things" sex can do without distoring it's function when done solo.

Masturbation has a function?

 

[whysoserious]

Masturbation has a function?

It makes my feet go numb. Is that a function?

 

[MKULTRABOY]

^ That is NOT healthy!

 

[StillBallin75]

It makes my feet go numb. Is that a function?

yo that's messed up, go to a doc get your circulation checked.

 

[MKULTRABOY]

The blood runs from his feet to his dick :lamo :rofl:

 

[as if]

Let me ask you a question. Would you ever seek to criminalize being disabled? No? Why not? They are a certain way and they cannot help it. Gay people are exactly the same. How can somebody be against gay rights and justify it morally? How can somebody justify morally, taking away people's rights because they are born a particular way? It just cannot be done.

Your stance is not a moral one; it is immoral, anti-constitution and against every value we hold dear to our hearts in the West - the only slither of real hope and freedom on this planet.

You really are clueless.

Now that everyone is done with thier fun. YOU can explain how disabled has anything aligined with sex.

Never mind disabled may want sex may be gay or some other red herring.

JUST HOW ON THIS PLANET OR ANY OTHER DOES A MENTAL OR PHYSICAL INABILLITY TO FUNCTION IN LIFE NORMALLY FROM BIRTH OR OTHERWISE EQUATE TO SEX

thanx I'm sure someone if not you will jump on that to circle jerk it one more time.

 

[as if]

Masturbation has a function?

Believe it or not, or support it (masturbation) or not.

It is and would be your decision ... most notably in a society where some would have us believe every desire of an individual outweighs the needs of the many.

Bring any ole agrument you like into it.

 

[winston53660]

JUST HOW ON THIS PLANET OR ANY OTHER DOES A MENTAL OR PHYSICAL INABILLITY TO FUNCTION IN LIFE NORMALLY FROM BIRTH OR OTHERWISE EQUATE TO SEX
.

It doesn't but it is consistent with your views on abnormal and unnatural towards gays and how you want to be treated as second class citizens.

 

[as if]

It doesn't but it is consistent with your views on abnormal and unnatural towards gays and how you want to be treated as second class citizens.

I assume you mean I am supposed to want YOU to be treated as a second class citizen. Not biting Go fish

 

[winston53660]

I assume you mean I am supposed to want YOU to be treated as a second class citizen. Not biting Go fish

What is being pointed out is that you are inconsistent in your definitions/viewws of abnormal and unnatural.

 

[as if]

What is being pointed out is that you are inconsistent in your definitions/viewws of abnormal and unnatural.

Prove it post them or sit down.

 

[winston53660]

Prove it post them or sit down.

You really don't need to use that tone.

It is fairly simple. You view gays as abnormal unnatural and that is your basis for treating them differently under the law.

I fulfill both abnormal (rare heart condition) and unnatural (implanted defibrillator) yet you would have me treated the same as you under the law.

You are inconsistent.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Nonesense and that flimflam stuff wont work...abnormal is to me whatever I believe it is...not what you believe. If you believe two men coupling is normal then your abnormal and your opinion is irrevelant

Guess what? YOUR opinion of abnormal is irrelevant. If you want to give a shot at defining abnormal, be my guest. Other than that, nothing you said has any relevancy to anyone but you... and therefore has no validity in debate.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Stillballin...every thread on homosexuality and homosexual marriage on every forum is identical to this one...gays and supporters of gays say WERE NORMAL and WE DONT GIVE A "F" what anyone else says...your an idiot if you dont agree your a moron your stupid your an asshole...well guess what..being a homosexual is abnormal no matter how many insults you throw around no matter how many times you abuse people that know its abnormal, no matter how many times repeat its OUR RIGHT no matter what...period its abnormal and none of you can prove otherwise...all you do is ignore and discredit with insults everyone elses opinion...

1) No one has insulted you here.
2) Unless you are talking about statistical analysis, you, and anyone else, is incapable of proving that homosexuality is abnormal, and no amount of screaming from you will change that... like it or not. But if you are so confident, go for it. Prove that homosexuality is abnormal...NOT in the statistical sense.

 

[as if]

You really don't need to use that tone.

It is fairly simple. You view gays as abnormal unnatural and that is your basis for treating them differently under the law.

I fulfill both abnormal (rare heart condition) and unnatural (implanted defibrillator) yet you would have me treated the same as you under the law.

You are inconsistent.

I had a feeling , but I will entertaine yo one more time.

A: you cant? dont know no mention of my contradictions but...

B: I have problems too, want to trade? YOU BETTER BE VERY CERTAIN OF THAT

C: as opposed to persistantly wrong and consistantly engaging in a circular argument?

Nothing you said is new in the argument, I didnt see a check the email box. I am not much for email but feel free to check off send user email noticifaction, I wander off.

Just incase you didint get the jist in the past or now, I am not going to entertain a circle jerk, never did not in any manner. pun intended

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Your ignorant sir if you cant understand that two men and two women cannot procreate...if you cant understand that 94% are normal and its the 6% that are not...it is you that is predisposed to ignorantly ignoring the truth...like many others in this thread.

Not a single one of you have given one iota of validity to homosexuality and two men coupling being normal...ALL you have done is insult the two people that disagree with you posts and insult them. Your not debating

Procreation is irrelevant to sexual orientation. The two are mutually exclusive. If the equitpment works, heterosexuals OR homosexuals can procreate.

There. That was easy. Destroyed your position in three sentences. Do you have anything else?

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

If im not welcome on this forum because I will not change my opinion on homosexual marriage and homosexuality being normal...than all an admin has to do is ask me to leave and I shall promptly do so...but if any of you think your going to badger me because I disagee with you, or that it will change my mind, your nuts, so just give me the nod and Ill take a hike and you can all agree with each other

No one is going to ask you to leave because of your position, but if you are going to get all hurt because you are unable to support your position with logic, perhaps you should think about debating a topic that you CAN support with logic. I don't care if you change your opinion, but if you are going to say, "this is what I believe, and it's right because I say so", and then complain because people are demonstrating that you are refusing to prove anything, your complaints will go unheard. This is a debate site. If you just want people to accept your position, blindly, you are in the wrong place.

 

[as if]

Procreation is irrelevant to sexual orientation. The two are mutually exclusive. If the equitpment works, heterosexuals OR homosexuals can procreate.

There. That was easy. Destroyed your position in three sentences. Do you have anything else?

Insipid next

 

[winston53660]

A: you cant? dont know no mention of my contradictions but...

That makes no sense what so ever.

B: I have problems too, want to trade? YOU BETTER BE VERY CERTAIN OF THAT

That much I believe wholeheartedly.

C: as opposed to persistantly wrong and consistantly engaging in a circular argument?

If I was wrong speak up and correct me. Is your treatment of gays not based on your notions of abnormality and unnatural?

Nothing you said is new in the argument, I didnt see a check the email box. I am not much for email but feel free to check off send user email noticifaction, I wander off.

I don't have the slightest idea what you are trying to talk about here.

Just incase you didint get the jist in the past or now, I am not going to entertain a circle jerk, never did not in any manner. pun intended

Whatever.

 

[as if]

No one is going to ask you to leave because of your position, but if you are going to get all hurt because you are unable to support your position with logic, perhaps you should think about debating a topic that you CAN support with logic. I don't care if you change your opinion, but if you are going to say, "this is what I believe, and it's right because I say so", and then complain because people are demonstrating that you are refusing to prove anything, your complaints will go unheard. This is a debate site. If you just want people to accept your position, blindly, you are in the wrong place.

Dont bother any further I do not even have to read past the first line to know I do not have to read the rest.

Logic natural etc etc get real and find more friends like you

being an annoyance is only entertaining to some at best or temporarily to the bored

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Insipid next

No defense. Pwned again. Next.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Dont bother any further I do not even have to read past the first line to know I do not have to read the rest.

Logic natural etc etc get real and find more friends like you

being an annoyance is only entertaining to some at best or temporarily to the bored

Still no defense. How does it feel to have had your entire position shown to be completely without logic?

Come on... with all your screaming and posturing, you've got nothing. I asked you pages ago to define "normal". Can't do it, can you?

 

[as if]

That makes no sense what so ever.

That much I believe wholeheartedly.

If I was wrong speak up and correct me. Is your treatment of gays not based on your notions of abnormality and unnatural?

I don't have the slightest idea what you are trying to talk about here.

Whatever.

Yea I missed a comma after know

wholeheartedly what>? yes/ no/ great. makes perfect sense

If? reread it all then, but pay close attention to the same old tired non arguments. Didnt I say to you directly dont ask me to hold your hand?

My notions of abnormal? Did the dictionary change the definition of normal etc etc like it did marriage for the gay agenda?

(I know, I am provoking yet one more exchange, lets see how coherent and on track with a real argument this can be.)

Yea whatever then ~shrugs~

 

[Misbelief]

I had a feeling , but I will entertaine yo one more time.

A: you cant? dont know no mention of my contradictions but...

B: I have problems too, want to trade? YOU BETTER BE VERY CERTAIN OF THAT

C: as opposed to persistantly wrong and consistantly engaging in a circular argument?

Nothing you said is new in the argument, I didnt see a check the email box. I am not much for email but feel free to check off send user email noticifaction, I wander off.

Just incase you didint get the jist in the past or now, I am not going to entertain a circle jerk, never did not in any manner. pun intended

Holy ****...you didn't mention even one of his points. You just went off about random things that had nothing to do with his argument.


He wasn't mentioning his problems because he wants you to feel sorry for him. He's saying that if you apply your argument for homosexuality to him then by the same token he should be treated differently under the law. It's the same exact thing I was doing with blacks and you still have not addressed that.

Here's good advice, take your argument and apply it to something else, for instance, apply your argument to other groups of people. If the argument is not convincing to you(which it obviously isn't since you've already state that you believe blacks should be equal under the law) then you should NOT use it.