IMNSHO - you're too quick to dismiss her, here.
In technical analysis I'm not sure if this recent Trumpian upward movement is a new trend-line, or normal vacillation around the normal "trading range", so to speak.
538: Odds
Predictwise: 2016 Presidential
Predictwise: Probability
Notice how we are most of the way, but not quite, where we were at in both pre-convention August and again in June.
Clearly, Trump has *not* broken out of his upward resistance point (at least as of yet).
This race was a 3-4 point race for quite a few months. Then Trump had his worst month (August), and the lead opened-up another maybe 5 points. But she couldn't/didn't put him away; she sat on her heels quietly collecting money, hoping he would self-destruct. Now, she has had her worst several weeks of the campaign, coincident with his best several weeks. But at best, he isn't quite even tied with her (in terms of electoral college votes and national polls), much less winning.
And now she's back on the campaign trail heading into the debates, and her popular surrogates (Obama, Bernie, Biden, et al) will be heading out around the country.
So at this point, I'm thinking what we're seeing is more-or-less in the normal variance range of this campaign, and like all variance it will tend to settle back. At the end of August everyone spoke doom & gloom for Trump, and in my posts then I cautioned that he wasn't out yet - and I'm now stating the same here for Hillary.
Now some here are claiming a change in fundamentals (Trump reset/HRC negative tipping point). That remains to be seen and is a valid train of thought, but I'd need to see Trump ahead nationally by at least a few percentage points in the vast majority of the polls (+3pts minimum), and also winning by a few states in the Electoral College (~300 EV+), in order to claim he broke out of his resistance points. I suppose it could happen, but right now there's no way I'd make that claim (yet).
On to the debates! :thumbs: