Iran will enrich uranium up to 60% if it wants to, Khamenei warns amid discontent over IAEA deal

[jaeger19]

You're not deserving of my time until you can overhaul your attitude. Start by making a contribution to this discussion.

Your failure is noted. You have no idea what my attitude is. You know nothing about me.
You are the one that needs an attitude adjustment. It must be hard getting through doors with that massive chip on your shoulder.
Have a nice day.

 

[Montgomery]

Your failure is noted. You have no idea what my attitude is. You know nothing about me.
You are the one that needs an attitude adjustment. It must be hard getting through doors with that massive chip on your shoulder.
Have a nice day.

Your American arrogance has caused you to burn your bridges.
You would have done better if you had followed tigerace's lead and become a target of mockery! (snicker)

My day's looking better!

 

[jaeger19]

Your American arrogance has caused you to burn your bridges.
You would have done better if you had followed tigerace's lead and become a target of mockery! (snicker)

My day's looking better!

Yawn.. "my american arrogance"?
You know nothing about me. You are the one that has the arrogance problem.
Either way.. your failure is noted.

 

[Robertinfremont]

Yes, of course. They would use one nuke, knowing that their holy city of Qum and probably also Tehran would go up in smoke 25 minutes later.

Given you laid no ground work to support that, based on what do you make that claim?

They are individuals that are not part of any Government. 9/11 terrorists did not represent any government.

 

[Luce]

Given you laid no ground work to support that, based on what do you make that claim?

They are individuals that are not part of any Government. 9/11 terrorists did not represent any government.

Wait. Iran doesn't have a government?

 

[Robertinfremont]

Wait. Iran doesn't have a government?

Iran has one.

 

[Tigerace117]

You're not deserving of my time until you can overhaul your attitude. Start by making a contribution to this discussion.

In other words.....you can’t defend your claims. As usual.

 

[Luce]

Iran has one.

And who is enriching the uranium?

 

[Tigerace117]

Your American arrogance has caused you to burn your bridges.
You would have done better if you had followed tigerace's lead and become a target of mockery! (snicker)

My day's looking better!

Oh look, another round of pompous garbage from the CPC fanboy.

We get that you are laughably ignorant and can’t defend your claims, there‘s no need to remind us every post

 

[Robertinfremont]

And who is enriching the uranium?

Iran is enriching the uranium.

 

[Montgomery]

Biden can't have a war on Iran now, the US has burnt all it's capital to justify it.
Trump and Trump's supporters can and will use that against Biden, claimin he's weak an is endangering America.
Iran won't attack the US but that won't make any difference to Trump's supporters as they play up the possibility.

America's hawkish military will continue to play up Iran's defensive actions as being offense aggression against America in Iran's territory or in Iraq. The sooner Biden attempts a new nuclear deal with Iran, the better for world peace.

But of course the wild card will continue to be the Zionist apartheid regime that can't tolerate peace with Iran unless Iran cedes them credibility to continue their slaughter of the Palestinian people.

That's my free preview for Biden's term.

 

[Montgomery]

Iran is enriching the uranium.

In fairness Robert, shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons on it's soil 'IF' they want them?

Or is it fairer that they don't and fall under the protection of China's and Russia's nuclear deterrent to US aggression?

Personally, I don't see much urgency on account of America's loss of credibility over cancelling out of the 5+1 agreement which was proving security to all countries.

I don't see Iran obtaining it's own nuclear weapons, because it doesn't need them now. The US has been forced to abandon it's PNAC agenda, mostly due to Obama's cutting the legs out from under his country on Syria. Russia now owns Syria and by extension, the sympathies of Iraq.

 

[Robertinfremont]

In fairness Robert, shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons on it's soil 'IF' they want them?

Or is it fairer that they don't and fall under the protection of China's and Russia's nuclear deterrent to US aggression?

Personally, I don't see much urgency on account of America's loss of credibility over cancelling out of the 5+1 agreement which was proving security to all countries.

I don't see Iran obtaining it's own nuclear weapons, because it doesn't need them now. The US has been forced to abandon it's PNAC agenda, mostly due to Obama's cutting the legs out from under his country on Syria. Russia now owns Syria and by extension, the sympathies of Iraq.

I am not one that rushes to decisions like you suggest. You have asked me a very legitimate question. I frankly do not fear nuclear weapons as much as a few here fear them. I know if one is used, it will have repercussions. Iran could manage to drop one of them but faces repercussions if they do.

I know since I was born ahead of the Nuclear age, that this is a hot button issue for many, nuclear bombs and who has them.

i recall the cries of danger when it was India getting it's own nuclear bombs. Then I recall when it was Pakistan. All hell would break out and they would nuke each other. Did not happen.

 

[Robertinfremont]

Biden can't have a war on Iran now, the US has burnt all it's capital to justify it.
Trump and Trump's supporters can and will use that against Biden, claimin he's weak an is endangering America.
Iran won't attack the US but that won't make any difference to Trump's supporters as they play up the possibility.

America's hawkish military will continue to play up Iran's defensive actions as being offense aggression against America in Iran's territory or in Iraq. The sooner Biden attempts a new nuclear deal with Iran, the better for world peace.

But of course the wild card will continue to be the Zionist apartheid regime that can't tolerate peace with Iran unless Iran cedes them credibility to continue their slaughter of the Palestinian people.

That's my free preview for Biden's term.

I spent time years back with a man born in what you call Palestine but all he cared about was his parents lost their home and business due to Israel forming a Government.

He retired as a pilot for a Mid Eastern airline. He would get very intense in his feelings that his parents were wronged by Israel. I was loathe to mention it to him fearing he would be upset by me for no decent human reason. But if he brought it up, he was supper emotional when he did.

My message is that there is no country known as Palestine. As there is no country, that fictional country has no government.

Israel would love to not deal with bombs from Gaza. I do not think they get such bombs from the West Bank. But I do not follow Israel news a lot.

Gaza is the hotbed as we all are aware. At my age of 82, predating Israel or this myth called Palestine, I see little hope this has a near term ending.

 

[Montgomery]

I am not one that rushes to decisions like you suggest. You have asked me a very legitimate question. I frankly do not fear nuclear weapons as much as a few here fear them. I know if one is used, it will have repercussions. Iran could manage to drop one of them but faces repercussions if they do.

I know since I was born ahead of the Nuclear age, that this is a hot button issue for many, nuclear bombs and who has them.

i recall the cries of danger when it was India getting it's own nuclear bombs. Then I recall when it was Pakistan. All hell would break out and they would nuke each other. Did not happen.

Nuclear weapons are a deterrent to aggression and have likely saved us from a WW3 for over 75 years. In my opinion, that has been a deterrent to US aggression but that's an opinion that doesn't need debating here.

Any nuclear weapons (not a dirty bomb) used by terrorists or freedom fighters will have a finger print that can be tracked back to the country of origin. That doesn't mean that a stray Russian bomb used on New York will be revenged on Russia, but it does pose a significant problem. That's the reason for precautions being taken by all parties that are nuclear capable.

 

[Robertinfremont]

Nuclear weapons are a deterrent to aggression and have likely saved us from a WW3 for over 75 years. In my opinion, that has been a deterrent to US aggression but that's an opinion that doesn't need debating here.

Any nuclear weapons (not a dirty bomb) used by terrorists or freedom fighters will have a finger print that can be tracked back to the country of origin. That doesn't mean that a stray Russian bomb used on New York will be revenged on Russia, but it does pose a significant problem. That's the reason for precautions being taken by all parties that are nuclear capable.

I have read you fighting with others that America has been the aggressor. Why if we are, hasn't nuclear bombs deterred us from being the aggressor as you claim?

 

[Montgomery]

I am not one that rushes to decisions like you suggest. You have asked me a very legitimate question. I frankly do not fear nuclear weapons as much as a few here fear them. I know if one is used, it will have repercussions. Iran could manage to drop one of them but faces repercussions if they do.

I know since I was born ahead of the Nuclear age, that this is a hot button issue for many, nuclear bombs and who has them.

i recall the cries of danger when it was India getting it's own nuclear bombs. Then I recall when it was Pakistan. All hell would break out and they would nuke each other. Did not happen.

Israel is Palestine. I'm not even going to start telling you of everything in that which I disagree upon

I spent time years back with a man born in what you call Palestine but all he cared about was his parents lost their home and business due to Israel forming a Government.

He retired as a pilot for a Mid Eastern airline. He would get very intense in his feelings that his parents were wronged by Israel. I was loathe to mention it to him fearing he would be upset by me for no decent human reason. But if he brought it up, he was supper emotional when he did.

My message is that there is no country known as Palestine. As there is no country, that fictional country has no government.

Israel would love to not deal with bombs from Gaza. I do not think they get such bombs from the West Bank. But I do not follow Israel news a lot.

Gaza is the hotbed as we all are aware. At my age of 82, predating Israel or this myth called Palestine, I see little hope this has a near term ending.

Israel is Palestine. I'm not even going to start telling you of everything in that with which I disagree.

 

[Montgomery]

I have read you fighting with others that America has been the aggressor. Why if we are, hasn't nuclear bombs deterred us from being the aggressor as you claim?

That question shouldn't even deserve an answer but it's simply the fact that MAD has kept us safe from WW3.
I hope you realize that I won't entertain anybody who asks such an ignorant question!

 

[Robertinfremont]

That question shouldn't even deserve an answer but it's simply the fact that MAD has kept us safe from WW3.
I hope you realize that I won't entertain anybody who asks such an ignorant question!

It was over your claim that the USA is the aggressor here.

 

[Robertinfremont]

Israel is Palestine. I'm not even going to start telling you of everything in that which I disagree upon

Israel is Palestine. I'm not even going to start telling you of everything in that with which I disagree.

Israel is just Israel.

 

[Montgomery]

It was over your claim that the USA is the aggressor here.

Answer the question yourself to show that you're still worthy of my time. I don't suffer any American lightly when they start spamming my comments, be that purposely or otherwise.

 

[trouble13]

Iran will enrich uranium up to 60% if it wants to, Khamenei warns amid discontent over IAEA deal

If Iran wanted nuclear weapons, it would have them, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has declared, suggesting Tehran may continue enriching uranium up to 60 percent. The statement followed outcry over President Hassan Rouhani’s IAEA deal.

www.rt.com

Iran has proven itself to be a peaceful nation that should have nuclear weapons if it chooses to have them for it's own protection. However, Iran has declared that it is against their religious beliefs to keep nuclear weapons and so most likely won't, unless they become seriously threatened with nuclear war with the ME's apartheid regime.

It's time for a rational discussion on the matter. No nation has ambitions of starting a nuclear war with it's weapons. These weapons are meant as a defensive threat only and have likely saved humanity from a WW3 for over 75 years.

Opinions?

Anyone who wants sime should be free to build them with the understanding that for every 1 they build, we will build 5 and point all of them at them. Build away!

 

[Montgomery]

Anyone who wants sime should be free to build them with the understanding that for every 1 they build, we will build 5 and point all of them at them. Build away!

False bravado and arrogance has no place here. Russia already has an equal amount or more. And China has enough. So what?

You're disqualified!

 

[trouble13]

False bravado and arrogance has no place here. Russia already has an equal amount or more. And China has enough. So what?

You're disqualified!

We need to build more nukes.
You are disqualified

 

[Integrityrespec]

Iran will enrich uranium up to 60% if it wants to, Khamenei warns amid discontent over IAEA deal

If Iran wanted nuclear weapons, it would have them, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has declared, suggesting Tehran may continue enriching uranium up to 60 percent. The statement followed outcry over President Hassan Rouhani’s IAEA deal.

www.rt.com

Iran has proven itself to be a peaceful nation that should have nuclear weapons if it chooses to have them for it's own protection. However, Iran has declared that it is against their religious beliefs to keep nuclear weapons and so most likely won't, unless they become seriously threatened with nuclear war with the ME's apartheid regime.

It's time for a rational discussion on the matter. No nation has ambitions of starting a nuclear war with it's weapons. These weapons are meant as a defensive threat only and have likely saved humanity from a WW3 for over 75 years.

Opinions?

You trust the Iranians? They support terrorism and have openly preached the destruction of Israel.

Proposed Bill At Iran's Parliament Calls For Israel's 'Destruction'

A proposed bill in the Iranian parliament calls for the "destruction of Israel", as part of measures to avenge the killing of General Qasem Soleimani.

iranintl.com