If you had the ability to automatically enact or repeal only one law without congressional approval, what would you choose and why?
I would choose anything relating to the environment to re-enact. Anything to help the environment I would support. What about the rest of you?
Cannabis legal.
1. Over crowded prisons.
2. Over stretched courts.
3. Tax income.
4. Take a bite out of gang income.
5. Expanded medical research.
Restore ALL civil and Constitutional rights to men and women convicted for crimes who have served their sentences.
Allow expungement of criminal records after a reasonable period without re-offending.
Prohibit housing discrimination.
Repeal all "public registration" requirements. If society thinks someone is THAT dangerous, then sentence the perpetrator appropriately at time of conviction. (I.e. serial murderers to life imprisonment, pyromaniacs and sexual predators to psychiatric confinement).
Do the time, pay for the crime, return to full citizenship.
I would expand your suggestion to making all possession and purchase for personal use legal. Personal exchanges legal. Sales legal if licensed.
Legal/criminal liability would apply for harms committed while under the influence.
I would make it entirely legal. Sale, possession, trade, all good with no license. 21 years of age.
War on Drugs:
1. The war on Drugs should end, all drugs should be legal and drug use decriminalized.
2. All persons currently in prison for use or small level sales (no violence) should be immediately released.
3. All persons with a criminal record for use or small level sales shall have their records expunged.
4. Criminal acts shall not be excused because one was under the influence of drugs.
5. Taxes from legal sales will be used for education and treatment programs.
6. Employers may require drug testing for workers who appear under the influence at work, and may used confirmed results to discharge a worker.
7. Minors may not be sold drugs, but:
a. parents may issue and allow use within the home, or
b. grant documented permission for use under parental supervision at a party or gathering in another location.
c. Liability still ensues for criminal or civil violation while under the influence.
8. Drug laws involving the above shall be repealed, and Asset Forfeiture will be stopped.
In regards to this response, it was my error in formulating my post.
I was referring to ALL drugs. I would not hold any drug user accountable beyond civil and criminal liability for actual harms caused while using.
Throwing someone in jail for possession and use is a waste of jail space. I guess you haven't read my blog:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/blogs/captain-adverse/1391-time-re-introduce-myself.html
I would like to think that I would decline the opportunity.
We're all relieved.
You missed the point that this would make me the better person I am sure.
Because at the end of the day you have to be you.
DONT BE A JERK!
We live by RULES.
THE CIVILIZED
:2wave:
That's psychotic.
West WingBut if you think we're right, and you won't speak up 'cause you can't be bothered, then, God, Jed, I don't even want to know you.
I score big on both style and truth, if you cant see that then, God, Mr EcoFarm, I dont even want to know you.
West Wing
Are you trying to convince me or yourself? Because that looks like a steamy pile of insecurity.
The Republican Control Act is a piece of United States federal legislation, proposed by me, which outlaws the Republican Party of the United States and criminalizes membership in, or support for the Party or "Republican-action" organizations and defines evidence to be considered by a jury in determining participation in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of such organizations.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954#Controversy
The Communist Control Act (68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844) is a piece of United States federal legislation, signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954, which outlaws the Communist Party of the United States and criminalizes membership in, or support for the Party or "Communist-action" organizations and defines evidence to be considered by a jury in determining participation in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of such organizations.[1]
.......
However, the Supreme Court of the United States has not ruled on the act's constitutionality. Despite that, no administration has tried to enforce it. The provisions of the act outlawing the party have not been repealed. Nevertheless, the Communist Party USA continues to exist in the 21st century.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?