• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you find gay/trans perverted, why?

Gardener said:
My answer was in one of the first responses to this thread.

Is it actually impossible for you to be honest?
Click to expand...
I must have missed that.
I hope it's not too much of a bother, but could you repeat your answer.
I'd appreciate it.
 
Gardener said:
For starters, I do not conflate the two.

There is nothing perverted about either.


There ARE, however, vast legions of leftists too stupid to understand principles, and who operate strictly according to groupthink.
Click to expand...

There are vast legions of Trump cult followers too stupid to understand principle, and who operate strictly according to groupthink. They call any non straight sexual preference a perversion.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Yes.
I'm absolutely positive of it.
Ive seen it in multiple applications myself.

Children are not born being repulsed at the sight of two men kissing.
They learn it from bigots like you.
100%
I would think someone who claims to have vast knowledge on human behavior and neuroscience would already be aware of this.
I find that a tad odd that you dont.......
What are your views?
Click to expand...
Bless your heart. You call people bigots on order to make up for the fact that nobody ever said anything positive about you when young

Heck, you have such a lack of self esteem that you accuse some people of saying the OPPOSITE of what they actually said just so you can derive a false sense of superiority - a sense of superiority predicated upon sociopathy, no less.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
I must have missed that.
I hope it's not too much of a bother, but could you repeat your answer.
I'd appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Post 4 in this very thread.

You have proven my other observation absolutely accurate as well
 
Gardener said:
Bless your heart. You call people bigots on order to make up for the fact that nobody ever said anything positive about you when young

Heck, you have such a lack of self esteem that you accuse some people of saying the OPPOSITE of what they actually said just so you can derive a false sense of superiority - a sense of superiority predicated upon sociopathy, no less.
Click to expand...
Thank you so much for your response.
Its been duly noted and filed it in the proper receptacle.
And I appreciate the blessing!
 
Gardener said:
Post 4 in this very thread.
Click to expand...
Well, what other thread would it be in silly.

It's good to know that an outspoken citizen like yourself doesn't find gays/trans perverted.

Well done.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Well, what other thread would it be in silly.

It's good to know that an outspoken citizen like yourself doesn't find gays/trans perverted.

Well done.
Click to expand...
You are just SO desperate.
 
Gardener said:
I am not sure of your degree of flexibility, so have some on an alternate list.
Click to expand...

What exactly are you trying to say? Stop beating around the bush and just say it.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Thanking you for not assuming gays/trans folk are perverted makes me desperate in your mind?

I'm just glad I could help you reaffirm your abundant anti-leftist bias.

That warms my heart.
Click to expand...
I do not support forcing young women to compete against men in sports.

I support that liberal value while you oppose it
.
 
noonereal said:
I think the answer is simple. It is repulsive to most men to watch two men kiss. Nature makes it this way.
Click to expand...
I think that's the case. Seeing to men kiss each other wouldn't involve you. I think if you're a pulse buy it you're imagining yourself involved in it.
noonereal said:
Women hold the beauty in the species. So it does not hold the same degree of revulsion.
Click to expand...
Then why would someone be repulsed by two men they don't see as beautiful kissing one another? If what you're saying is true then catfishing couldn't be a thing.
noonereal said:
If you watch a ballet, figure skating, ballroom dancing the eyes of the audience is always on the women. Both men and women watch the women as the main focus of concentration.
Click to expand...
So you've never been to a ballet.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
I've asked this question of most of the bigoted transphobic/Homophobic folks here, but i never get a viable response.
Normally, they just refuse to answer.
Or, they'll answer "if you don't know i feel sorry for you", or something along those lines.

I'd like to try and understand what makes some think their sexual proclivities are less or more perverse than other folks.

I recall as a teenager, sitting around with my friends shooting the shit. We'd discuss all sorts of topics. One day, homosexuality came up. We all agreed that watching two beautiful females kissing would be pleasing. But, when visualizing two men kissing on the mouth, their grisly beards scratching against one another, the reactions became mixed.
Now, none of us were bigots as teenagers, but I wondered, what caused some kids to swing towards bigotry in adulthood, and others to lean towards acceptance and inclusion?
Click to expand...
It's a pity that people you're asking won't participate.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Maybe they're heterosexuality isn't as prominent as they would like it to be.
Click to expand...

What the **** does that even mean. Heterosexuality is literally the norm.

It's not some sort of zero sum game, and even it was the gays certainly aren't the winners.
 
StillBallin75 said:
What the **** does that even mean. Heterosexuality is literally the norm.
Click to expand...
It means I don't think such a person (that is overly offended it disgusted by homosexuality it transgenderism )is secure in their heterosexuality.

I apologize if that wasn't clear.
StillBallin75 said:
It's not some sort of zero sum game, and even it was the gays certainly aren't the winners.
Click to expand...
I have no idea what this is in reference to.
 
Gardener said:
I do not support forcing young women to compete against men in sports.

I support that liberal value while you oppose it
.
Click to expand...

Nobody is being forced, they are free to ****ing quit if they're scared of the competition.

Speaking of "liberal values," the ACLU disagrees with you on this one as does the actual science.

Then again, wouldn't expect a genocide lover to be a reliable barometer of "liberal values" anyway.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Hummm
Well let's flip that.
Hypothetically,
Could you be happy being a gay/trans?
Because if you can't, then you're obsessively heterosexual.

I hope you see my point.
Your comment makes no sense.
Click to expand...
You flipped it wrong.
I made a distinction between how a person feels (trans) and how they dress and/or behave.
A trans female should be able to be happy even if not dressing or behaving female. If their happiness depends on dressing/behaving female, then I consider them to be obsessed with being female.
Your question made different distinctions - between being cis or trans. Not relevant to what I call obsessive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom