JDaly1978 said:So...the 200k+ people he's gassed isn't proof enough for you?
>That was Sept. of 1988. Welcome to 2005.<
There has been a continue "file" if you will on Saddam. There is a long list of reasons we we should have and did remove him. Clinton was in office for how many years and kept saying he was going to get Saddam. He never did.
Perhaps you can tell us the lineup and order of the next few?Rhadamanthus said:America keeps creating monsters and then when they get to powerfull and stop listening to us we kill them. It's like invasive plants, you have a plant that is killing off natural plants, so you bring in a plant to kill the invasive plant but it turns out to be worse.
That's what we did with Osama, we wanted to get rid of the soviets, we bilt up Osama, he got rid of the soviets, and now we are getting rid of him.
Typical.Rhadamanthus said:Well I draw a blank looking into the future, i may be able to do the research for you. But the past is written in the last few wars we have faught.
You know, I was wondering about that myself. I guess I should feel flattered to be able to have the last word on this subject in the company of such astute individuals.Rhadamanthus said:fantasea, how long has this been up, a month? And so correct that nobody would dare try to argue. Have you ever tried writing a book? I mean, people like ann coulter, and you write a lot like she does, except you have more veriety.
Fantasea said:You know, I was wondering about that myself. I guess I should feel flattered to be able to have the last word on this subject in the company of such astute individuals.
Ann Coulter? I love the way she drives the socialist-lib-Dems nuts. She just keeps on skewering them. Try as they may, they haven't found a way to shut her up.
anomaly said:Ann Coulter: synonym: liar!
Just read Al Franken's book Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. In it, he documents many of Ann's lies. Notice also that Ann defends 'the common man' when it comes to morals, but when it comes to economics she is very pro-business.
Since the Democrats never change their style of playing, she must repeat the same criticisms.Rhadamanthus said:Yes but the problem with her is that she has the same argument for everything. She's like a parrot that just keeps saying the same thing over and over agian.
What is wrong with being pro-business? Isn't it business that provides the jobs for 'the common man'? Business should receive every incentive and encouragement to create jobs.anomaly said:Ann Coulter: synonym: liar!
Just read Al Franken's book Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. In it, he documents many of Ann's lies. Notice also that Ann defends 'the common man' when it comes to morals, but when it comes to economics she is very pro-business.
Fantasea said:What is wrong with being pro-business? Isn't it business that provides the jobs for 'the common man'? Business should receive every incentive and encouragement to create jobs.
Anti-business activities result in lost jobs. How does that help?
I think it's sad that the only 'spokesmen' the socialist-lib-Dems can find to push their propaganda on the airwaves are a pair of professional clowns (comedians in this case), Al Franken and Jeanine Garofalo.
anomaly said:The problem with being TOO pro-business is that when laissez-faire policies are practiced, workers often lose rights. Plus, workers should always have the right to organise, and Republicans are almost always against labor unions. But let's get back on topic. Fant, are you willing to admit atleast that Ann Coulter lies? I'd just love for a con to finally admit that. Just say it-Ann Coulter is a liar!
Pacridge said:We have a winner! That's it in a nut shell. They say drinking water is good for you. I try to drink several glasses a day. I don't think drinking 50 gallons a day would be healthy.
There's a limit to this "Pro-Business" thing. If being Pro-business means you're doing away with all the rights workers have won over the years, we're going to start taking steps backwards in this country. Hum, Guess we already have taken steps backwards. First we do anyway with overtime laws that ensure our workers are paid fairly when they work over 40 hours a week (oh ya, we just tell people we're doing that so big companies can pay their workers more fairly. Sure lots of time big business lobbies Congress to change laws so they can pay workers "More Fairly.") Next we'll be getting rid of our child labor laws. Why can't a 13 yr. old work 12 hour days? What? You want more welfare queens or something? Put that kid to work.
Pacridge said:So why do you 'accuse' Ms Coulter of being pro-business?Nothing wrong with being pro business. I happen to own and operate one. My family and I, as well as several employees depend on it's success.
That's what I said. The only defense for the socialist-lib-Dems comes from a pair of clowns.What's sad is two comedians, or anyone for that matter, can easily pick up any of her books, do even the most basic of fact checking and see she's blatantly lying. That's what's sad. Well, that and the fact that so many people believe the lies she telling. Sad indeed.
These days, the favorite passtime at most unions is thinking up new ways to screw the members.anomaly said:The problem with being TOO pro-business is that when laissez-faire policies are practiced, workers often lose rights. Plus, workers should always have the right to organise, and Republicans are almost always against labor unions. But let's get back on topic. Fant, are you willing to admit atleast that Ann Coulter lies? I'd just love for a con to finally admit that. Just say it-Ann Coulter is a liar!
Rhadamanthus said:Fantasea, this is a classis example of twisting the facts by only showing a small portion of a persons statement, Pacridge is saying, as I am sure you know, that it is when people become too pro-buisness that he has a problem with them.
He is free to have a problem with whomsoever he pleases. I don't have the same problem.
One is either anti or pro. I understand that.If he is accusing Ann Coulter of being pro-buisness he must be accusing her of being overly pro-buisness. You understand?
This sounds like a kid in the schoolyard shouting at another, "And, so's yer old man!'Well if the only defense for solialist-lib-Dems is from a pair of clowns then the most commonly read work of conservative republicans is a large amount of blatant lying inside of a badly written text sold at airport newstands.
anomaly said:Sadly, Pacridge, I've actually debated with someone on here who thought children should have 'the right to work'. Now, when child labor is legal, how often to children get to choose whther they work or not?
Fantasea said:Pacridge said:So why do you 'accuse' Ms Coulter of being pro-business?
That's what I said. The only defense for the socialist-lib-Dems comes from a pair of clowns.
I never accused Ms. Coulter of being pro-business. I accused her of being what she is, a lair.
Fantasea said:One is either anti or pro. I understand that.