• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How we know democrats are full of crap

Get over it.



Sure. How's that repeal-and-replace coming?


Pretty easy to get favorability when a large percentage of those people are being subsidized.

Get over it lol……I bet you are subsidized aren’t you. So ****ing flippant while others get screwed. It’s pathetic and sickening that we are forced to pay for people like you.
 
Trump's lawyers had the opportunity to present contrary facts and were not able to do it on any of the 67 occasions they had a chance to do so, and then also to the Supreme Court. You actually think that if Trump had any real proof that he would not have provided it?

Having said that, let me give you a common-sense reply. There are always a few people that mail in a fake ballot but that happens in all elections. Nonetheless, such cases in the past have been limited to less that 1,000, meaning not election turning. Biden won the election by 5 million votes. Do you understand that to have so many votes changed, the amount of people involved in doing that is huge. It means that if just ONE of those people involved feels bad about it and decides to "rat out" the people that hired him (the Democrats) and give proof that he had tens of thousands of votes changed, that Trump would have made his point that the election was stolen.

Has ANYONE done that?

No, no one has because there were not tens of thousands of Democrats involved in doing that. As such, such a fraud is impossible.

Think with your brain and not with your ears to what Trump has been trying to "sell to you"!
Biden won by 5 million votes lol. How many votes in the swing states gave Biden the electoral college victory? Are you just not capable of understanding that it was a very small number of votes out of that 150,000,000 million that changed the entire election?

Did you know that just 44,000 votes separated Biden and Trump from a tie? Another 20 or 30 thousand separated them from a win. A tiny percentage of the millions of willy nilly mail in ballots could have altered it all. And the only proof was tossed in the trash. At minimum a redo should have been ordered.
 
inflation was pretty low when Biden left office.
Where is your link to back up what you believe is true?

opinion noted.

and you provide nothing to back up your opinion. Why is that?
Wasting time on you, not happening. You can easily confirm my claims. If I’m wrong you can easily rebut those claims. Doing nothing but crying about “nothing to back my claims” is lazy. It’s not debating. I make a claim and you can agree or rebut the claim. When you provide evidence that I’m wrong then I am obligated to provide counter evidence.

You can’t say I’m wrong without providing evidence to back it while then claiming I provided no evidence. That’s not how it works.
 
inflation was pretty low when Biden left office.
Where is your link to back up what you believe is true?

opinion noted.

and you provide nothing to back up your opinion. Why is that?
The 9 percent peak inflation during Biden’s term had already exploded prices. It was 2.9 percent in 2024. It was 1.2 percent in 2020 under Trump.

Overall inflation grew 7.9 percent under Trump while wages grew by 15.4.

Under Biden inflation grew by 21.2 percent while wages grew by 19.4.

You have the numbers now so stop crying. And inflation was not “pretty low” it was almost triple what Trump left him with.
 
Your belief of who my "comrades" are is misplaced.

I see you must live by the two wrongs make it right stance. Why do you lower yourself to the level of those you claim call your candidates' names?
When I call some politician a name I make it clear it is an opinion.
I live by an eye for an eye stance. Don’t do it to me and I won’t do it to you. I tried the do unto others approach and it doesn’t work.

It is incredibly unfair to have only one side playing nice. Frankly I got tired of playing nice. If they want to walk a tight rope with forum rules with the personal attacks so be it. If they wish to call my candidate names well I can be very creative myself.

KamalaTOE Harris is one of my good ones.

The hair sniffer in chief another one.

These days I actually enjoy the creativity displayed by some of your leftist comrades. The orange man lol. That’s some funny shit right there.
 
Yeah that sucks. But i am a rational person. Seeking assylum has nothing to do with it.
It does if you are lying about seeking asylum and use the process taught by nickyjo to remain in the country and then go on to rape or kill.

Seeking asylum didn’t have just anything to do with it, it had everything to do with it. Had these rapist and killers NOT sought asylum they would have been deported and unable to prey on those victims.

If you can’t understand what I just told you above you are NOT a rational person.
 
Of course they dated. No one denies that. So freaking what?

you didnt just say they dated. Stop with the lies.

Your lie wasnt that they dated. It was how you characterized it. you are not correct. You know that and you are making a fool of yourself.

This was your lie:

"She allowed an old man twice her age, access to her body, for a career boost. This man, Willie Brown, was an extremely politically powerful man. Harris used her beautiful young hard body to get his endorsement. An endorsement that essentially launched her political career."

So can you stop with the lies "bud" or are you going to keep it up?
So a young hot woman just so happens to date a man twice her age. Would she have dated him if he wasn’t a powerful politician? I say no. Would she have dated him if she didn’t have political aspirations? I say no.

Best that willie tell you lol.

https://nypost.com/2024/07/31/world-news/kamala-harris-got-bmw-and-career-boost-from-older-lover/

He bought her a BMW and took her on trips lol. 29 vs 60 lol. She, like many whore like women, used her ASSets to secure her marks goods. In this case it was Browns political power. The car and trips were a bonus. Willie OTOH used his assets, money and political influence, to gain access to that much younger woman. This is a classic example of what Trump was describing in his open mic moment.

You know as well as I do that young hot women don’t get with old beat up men UNLESS there is a reason. Money, fame, power, drugs are the usual suspects. You know this. Why you can’t bring yourself to terms with the fact that Harris sought his power and used her ASSets to get that power, is the real question.
 
There are just eight states that have universal mail-in ballots. They are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington State. Link
Only Nevada out of those 8 states was a battleground state during the 2020 election.
Many municipalities in the swing states pass ordinances that lowered or eliminated signature verification rules and other precautions that prevent fraud all in an effort to keep voters and poll workers safe. Many mailed ballots to all voters. Others mailed in absentee ballot applications to all voters. Most reduced or removed fraud preventions.

https://allvotingislocal.org/reports/covid-19-silenced-voters-in-wisconsin/

One example.

“In general, changes to absentee voting fall into four categories: (1) expanding eligibility for absentee voting in the states that normally require an excuse to do so, (2) making it easier for voters to obtain absentee ballots by mailing ballot applications and/or ballots to all or a subset of registered voters, or by creating online ballot request systems, (3) making it easier to cast absentee ballots by including prepaid postage or providing safe ballot drop-off options, and (4) adjusting counting rules to prevent widespread disenfranchisement of eligible absentee voters.”

They made it easy to cheat lol.

And once again you give out information that while correct it is designed to trick those who don’t know the truth. In 2020 most of those states made special rules for mail in ballots. Your information is therefore irrelevant.
 
1. Read your first sentence.
2. Read your second sentence.

Might I suggestthe first sentence makes it very easy to destroy you in debate. Tariffs do not level any playng field when the product the tariffs are placed on are not made in the US. Even when the product being imported and faced with a tariff is in regards to a product the US also makes, it does not necessarily level any playing field.

You would know that if you had any understanding of what tariffs are and how they work. You clearly do not but you do come on this board and start your reponse bragging about how easy democrats are to debate with a false assumption as to how tariffs work and that in a nutshell explains exaftly why you and Magas who still support can not understand the damage he is causing to your own country.

Please carry on.
When a tariff is placed on foreign goods it makes them more expensive for consumers. This levels the playing field for American companies whose products, while usually far better, are more expensive. Increasing the price of foreign products allows American products to be competitive. This in fact levels the playing field as I said in the post you quoted. Being an expert on tariffs you should know this.
 
No they are not the same and once again you show you have no clue what it is you present.




Yah Donny is leveling the playing field as you said.
https://www.supermarketnews.com/gro...ces-experience-biggest-drop-in-almost-5-years

The lower fuel prices alone will reduce food prices.
 
...but you did and come on this board to brag about how you did.

Anything else?
Nice switch lol. That was the old classic avoid the question tactic used regularly by the leftists on this board.

Try addressing the hypocrisy I exposed lol. Makes for a better debate. Or are you to cowardly to answer and accept the loss.
 
Biden won by 5 million votes lol. How many votes in the swing states gave Biden the electoral college victory? Are you just not capable of understanding that it was a very small number of votes out of that 150,000,000 million that changed the entire election?

Did you know that just 44,000 votes separated Biden and Trump from a tie? Another 20 or 30 thousand separated them from a win. A tiny percentage of the millions of willy nilly mail in ballots could have altered it all. And the only proof was tossed in the trash. At minimum a redo should have been ordered.
BS
 
My private insurance from my old job doubled.
The ACA silver plan was even more.
The deductible made it unusable.
I was penalized monthly when I did my taxes for every month I was without insurance.

It was a disaster.
It is a disaster.

The Medicare parts of ACA are better integrated, and there are a few other useful things, but not much.

It's one of the black eyes on Obama's legacy. The other is Iran.
 
Wasting time on you, not happening. You can easily confirm my claims. If I’m wrong you can easily rebut those claims. Doing nothing but crying about “nothing to back my claims” is lazy. It’s not debating. I make a claim and you can agree or rebut the claim. When you provide evidence that I’m wrong then I am obligated to provide counter evidence.

You can’t say I’m wrong without providing evidence to back it while then claiming I provided no evidence. That’s not how it works.
interesting.
You want me to provide the evidence you are wrong. Sorry, in debates it is up to the person making the claim to provide the evidence.

Playing your game, you can look it up on what the inflation rate was when Biden left office.


1750776035498.webp
 
The 9 percent peak inflation during Biden’s term had already exploded prices. It was 2.9 percent in 2024. It was 1.2 percent in 2020 under Trump.

Overall inflation grew 7.9 percent under Trump while wages grew by 15.4.

Under Biden inflation grew by 21.2 percent while wages grew by 19.4.

You have the numbers now so stop crying. And inflation was not “pretty low” it was almost triple what Trump left him with.

noted. no link to the source of your numbers.

You also seem to forget that Biden had to deal with the global impact of covid on the economy.
 
I live by an eye for an eye stance. Don’t do it to me and I won’t do it to you. I tried the do unto others approach and it doesn’t work.

It is incredibly unfair to have only one side playing nice. Frankly I got tired of playing nice. If they want to walk a tight rope with forum rules with the personal attacks so be it. If they wish to call my candidate names well I can be very creative myself.

KamalaTOE Harris is one of my good ones.

The hair sniffer in chief another one.

These days I actually enjoy the creativity displayed by some of your leftist comrades. The orange man lol. That’s some funny shit right there.

so, who are my "comrades"?
 
Nice switch lol. That was the old classic avoid the question tactic used regularly by the leftists on this board.

Try addressing the hypocrisy I exposed lol. Makes for a better debate. Or are you to cowardly to answer and accept the loss.
What switch. I am responding to your deflections and been clear which deflections. There is nothing old or classical about your deflections. What hypocrisy have you exposed? Your previous threads are there for all to see. I have responded word for word clearly challenging your positions.
 
So a young hot woman just so happens to date a man twice her age. Would she have dated him if he wasn’t a powerful politician? I say no. Would she have dated him if she didn’t have political aspirations? I say no.

Best that willie tell you lol.

https://nypost.com/2024/07/31/world-news/kamala-harris-got-bmw-and-career-boost-from-older-lover/

He bought her a BMW and took her on trips lol. 29 vs 60 lol. She, like many whore like women, used her ASSets to secure her marks goods. In this case it was Browns political power. The car and trips were a bonus. Willie OTOH used his assets, money and political influence, to gain access to that much younger woman. This is a classic example of what Trump was describing in his open mic moment.

You know as well as I do that young hot women don’t get with old beat up men UNLESS there is a reason. Money, fame, power, drugs are the usual suspects. You know this. Why you can’t bring yourself to terms with the fact that Harris sought his power and used her ASSets to get that power, is the real question.
The above comments sound like classic Russian baiting. There is no substance or positions with reasone dbasis for their conclusions, just childish name calling with sexist taunts that might project your own sexual insecurity but have no basis of verification.
 
Again you make a comment that shows your ignorance of how food prices are factored and where fuel prices to transport them are not the only factor. In fact common sense would tell you that even with lower fuel prices, if the supply of food shrinks which it is, the prices will still go up and not offset any fue price declines. How do you transport non existent supplies through the chain to the stores hmmmm?

Next you clearly do not understand that the mid to long term impact of the tariffs with Canada on gas and oil supplies have indeed triggered oil and gas increases and it depends where you live in the US.
 
Nice switch lol. That was the old classic avoid the question tactic used regularly by the leftists on this board.

Try addressing the hypocrisy I exposed lol. Makes for a better debate. Or are you to cowardly to answer and accept the loss.
Post 1710 made by you immediately before you issued your above comment shows you engaged in the very tactic you try accuse me of. Lol.
 
When a tariff is placed on foreign goods it makes them more expensive for consumers. This levels the playing field for American companies whose products, while usually far better, are more expensive. Increasing the price of foreign products allows American products to be competitive. This in fact levels the playing field as I said in the post you quoted. Being an expert on tariffs you should know this.
Your scenario again ignores many things including::

1-you assume tariffs are only being placed on matching items-they are not, in fact the vast majority of tariffs are being placed on items not made in the US so your comments do not apply;

2-you also assume when the tariffs are on matching prices, the American prices are always higher than the foreign ones and need competitive help from government intervention to control pricing which interestingly is a concept called socialism or communism;

3-further to 2, the American companies being protected by tariffs are large monopolies trying to prevent competition from start up businesses-the tariffs work as follows:

1-the American company producing the item sells them for 5.00
2-the tariff placed on the foreign matching item is say $2.00 meaning the foreign item is now 7.00
3-the American company now increases its price to 6.50 and goudges American consumers 1.50 being able to use the tariff as a cover to increase its prices
4-so in fact the US government enables American companies to goudge you and also the government taxes you
5-fledging companies now trying to start up can't compete with the already existing American companies using that increase in price to buy out any supplies preventing fledging American companies from being able to by those supplies crushing internal cometition and in fact fixing prices for a set group of elite monopolies.

The above scenario has been explained over and over even by the few pro tariff economists there are. They warn it may have limited use only if the sector where the tariffs are imposed only has fledging businesses that need help during their start up phase to avoid being put out of business by foreign producers.

Now interestingly the US goes into other countries and crushes competition buying out all its competitors. How does it do this The very trade imbalances you claim, puts money in those countries' banks. The US then with its higher currency borrows money at favourable lower rates from those banls to then buy up all the competitors in that country. The so called trade imbalance has been used by the US to obtain cheap foreign loans to buy out all the companies they compete with in those foreign countries.

In your simplistic sript you have no clue how international financing works let alone how trade imbalances simply mean the US is being able to expland its businesses overseas to crush foreign competitors through favourable interest loans from foreign banks thanks to those imbalances. More to the point, the natural resources causing those imbalances are not available in the US and when the US receives them, it refines them passing on their cost back on the consumer of their finalized product.

The tariff script uou repeat is a sham. It is a cover for a tax increase on the middle and lower classes to fund the record high spending Trump has earmarked in his big beautiful bill and you lap it up.
 
Pretty easy to get favorability when a large percentage of those people are being subsidized.

Get over it lol……I bet you are subsidized aren’t you. So ****ing flippant while others get screwed. It’s pathetic and sickening that we are forced to pay for people like you.
How are they being subsidized. Do you even know what a subsidy is. You through out the above as an insult.

You have any idea how many large monopolies on the US are subsidized to fix prices in their market places so they can impose unecessarily high prices? Well? Of course not. If you did your homework which would actually require you to do research and understand what subsidies are and who gets them instead of trotting out your phack poor people mantra,

It is estimated that 100 billion is paid out to US businesses in subsidies per year. You comment on that?
 
As I explained this information was used by violent illegals, who would normally have been turned away and sent home, to remain in this country. They obviously used the information you and others provided to stay. In doing so they were able to prey on thousands of innocent Americans. And yes thousands were raped and hundreds were murdered by those illegals during Biden’s open border invasion crisis.
Actually you did not explain. In fact you to date have proven no evidence. What you have done is express a subjective opinion by rhetorical allegation.

If you were not part of educating illegal as described above during the Trump and Biden administration then I withdraw my accusation and sincerely apologize.

Your apology is a joke. You accused someone on this forum and many others of being accomplices to criminal actions with no proof. If you did not have the ability to hide behind your anonymity on this forum and said such things on public domain revealing the actual names of the people you accuse, you would open yourselves to defamation of character.

It is cowardly to accuse people of crimes on this board with zero evidence. I myself find it a pathetic attempt to impugn someone with a personal attack and call the words out as cowardly.
 
How did coming back work for Garcia lol?
Again your giggling shows you do not understand what due process is and why it had to be followed and instead focus not on the issue of due process but your personal vendetta to punish people you think you do not like.

Tee hee.
 
Back
Top Bottom