Often times I find some things I actually like about the other candidate. There's always the urge to just dismiss it as it's usually trivial but half the time I give credit where credit is due.
Define "the other candidate"? I am neither a dem nor a Rep. I do not support one candidate or the the other. Sure, I will vote for Romney, but that is not actually support. But from my outside view, that is because Obama is a failure, supports policies I do not like and has acted in an unconstitutional way, not because I like, support or even believe in Romney. I am not a Libertarian, so I don't really support their candidate. Other than that, what little I know about the other "independents" are that they are mostly supporters of even greater measures from the left or right in one specialized area or another.
There are no candidates supporting an agenda with my beliefs. The right has more than the left in some cases, but then, most of the left are, imo, socialists. A philosophy that I find offensive, contrary to natural order and a great evil that is the enemy of mankind. I actually support quite a few ideas and goals of the left, however, their current trend of using socialism, or a derivative there of, to meet those goals means that I cannot, in anyway, support them. The ends do not justify the means, and if you use the wrong means, you don't get the ends that you desire.
To be fair, liberals aren't socialists. They exploit feminism and multiculturalism in order to expand the labor supply and drive down wages.
It's been this way since the progressive era if not earlier with the pursuits of first wave feminism and the melting pot.
On another note, consequentialism has been practiced by conservatives for quite sometime, and many conservatives have been switching sides as Rockefeller Republicans and Reagan Democrats because of how they're simpleminded.
Liberals view themselves as merely giving conservatives their just deserts. In reality, the only conservatives left standing are those who stand on principle while the bullies are switching sides for the sake of convenience.
Wow. Then what do you think of CEOs of corperations? I've known several CEOs. And how about a general rank of CEOs compared to politicians. Thanks.I would have to vote 0%, because I think it ought to be well-established by now that politicians are all lying, conniving, sociopathic, heartless, soulless sycophants to corporate and other interests. So I tend not to compliment any of them.
OhISee.Then said:Wow. Then what do you think of CEOs of corperations? I've known several CEOs. And how about a general rank of CEOs compared to politicians. Thanks.
...I have a hard time understanding why any person would put their trust in any member of either group.
When it applies.Often times I find some things I actually like about the other candidate. There's always the urge to just dismiss it as it's usually trivial but half the time I give credit where credit is due.
When it applies.
Many things that are put on Obama’s shoulders is not his fault. I disagree with Romney on a lot of things. So when it is something that applies to one of the candidates I will hold them to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?