A question is the opposite of an assertion. You made an assertion. I asked clarifying questions about your assertion. Don't play the victim because I dared to ask you questions about your asserted position. It's beyond silly to do the victim thing.
I already addressed this. If a woman being sexually assaulted enters your awareness, you do not have a limit on the amount of empathy you can have. You have limits on time and dedicated attention, sure, but that's not a limit on empathy itself.
If what you're saying were true, then if you heard the stories of 50, 100, 1000 women who were raped, at some point in that process you would reach a point where you didn't care that the women were raped. You'd be, at best, indifferent to it.
You may not have meant to suggest that, but that is indeed what logically follows in your stated position.
I already explained this more than once, and before this post. ONCE YOU ARE AWARE OF SOMETHING HAPPENING. Of course there is a limit on the amount of time and awareness you can pour into others' suffering, but once you become aware of someone's misfortune, you don't reach a maximum capacity on the amount of empathy that you can have for someone else. Empathy is not a finite thing.
If you heard 1000 consecutive stories of child molestation, would you have less empathy for the 1000th child telling their story, yes or no?
