Billo_Really said:
She used to be a women. Then she cut her hair, went butch, became a lesbian, making her more man-like, perfectly replacing the man we don't like, by pollsters giving her one major big "O".
I want both Ann Coulter and Hillary in a snow bound cabin so lesbian tendencies are not a problem, unless they throw me out in the snow to die.
Sex sells, and you can bet that a good looking president will win over an ugly one, even if the good looking one in the debates implies that deficits are good and the ugly sweaty one (Nixon) is against them to the point of impounding (that resulted in the 1974 Budget and Impound Control Act, which caused the budget to go up in a linear fashion until Reagan).
Hillary can win on the economy (good baggage for those that can‘t spell irrational exuberance) and social issues (that women care more about). That is why Republicans must choose a Newt, if they do not I bet they will lose big time and the Republicans will be puking their guts out at the display Democrats will make of it. Even with the baggage they both carry my bet is Hillary would win against all comers, except a well known Republican that clearly can say he was there and instrumental in Clinton’s economy. If Hillary is careful with her words, and so far she has shown far more intelligence than John Kerry ever could, she can win enough of the pro-war crowd, that are fed up with the economy, without totally alienating the anti-war crowd. Even those that take their time with an issue can see Republicans getting squashed like a bug in the next election, even if Iraq in 2007 looks like the best thing since chipped beef on a shingle.
Another issue that will certainly come up is heath care, and I say the Health fiasco could actually play in Hillary’s favor if the Republicans are stupid enough to bring up her work on that, and you can bet they will bring it up. Unless someone can prove that it could not work, Hillary can say what she supported could have worked, and if it gets too complicated Hillary wins the debate with the mob. Republicans can say that while they had both Congress and the White House they are not responsible for huge increases in the costs of health care. People want results, and the mob has an attention span that wants things to flash by like a music video; I guess I am a little old fashioned and would rather kill the editor and just focus on the chick while she sings. When Republican supporting corporations make agreements with the unions, that would sell out their own mother, to cut health insurance on retirees, to save money, because the retirees can get “some” relief from a government program like Medicare, all I see is a gross hypocrisy among Republicans that cries out for universal health insurance.
Let’s not even talk about illegal immigration and amnesty. And please do not mention the hideously ridiculous foreign debt, when I need a fuel efficient car that does not weigh a ton, especially considering the significance of this week (after the usurers demanded full payment while my house was under a tarp from a natural disaster.) I might explode, and get degusting stuff all over your screen.
I say we increase taxes on the rich, get CETA to rake leaves in the forest and to tag beach goers like Joseph Califano wanted to do (to save on health care), and let’s teach the damn rich hypocrites that can afford to drive Hummers a real lesson.
Newt 2008!