• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

HHS Whistleblower Goes Public With Secret Recordings "Vaccine is Full of Sh*t"

Let's just end this bullshit now.

Ok, well let's look at the who you know chain of persons.

I'm in the medical field with coherts that also work at large Boston hospitals.

I have not heard through any friends, coworkers, patients any serious adverse reaction to the covid vaccine.

Now, my coworkers, friends have a lot of people each of us know, each them know and the chain of persons goes on and on.

Zero. Although, Science and studies have recorded rare severe side effects, but we all already knew this.

In fact, through the hundreds of people that each of us talk to and about, most lined up, yep front line Nurses and doctors lined up for the covid vaccine.

In response to respond to what a individual commented on a video concerning what another individual said to a corrupt and hyper partisan shyster. BULLSHIT!

Don't go to a political shyster if you have evidence of a major health and Science issue. Well unless it's all political nonsense from someone who doesn't want to be required to get the vaccine.

So, maybe some complete background on this "masters prepared nurse" is in order before she gets to discredit Science
Ok, how long were the trials for these "Vaccines" ? Less than a year right ?
Isn't it common to have 10year trials ?

Why are many Nurse groups trying to get exemptions from taking the vaccine ?

Why aren't they talking about the miscarriages linked to the Vaccine?

The "Vaccines" with mRNA, aren't they more like Experimental Gene Therapy, and not a Vaccine ?

How come the CDC / Medical Community said hydroxychloroquine did not work just because Trump said it did ?
GBut now they are saying it does ?

Why were hospitals given $20K per Covid Death ?

Why is the Government trying to FORCE people to get the Vaccine even if they had Covid and got better (Natural immunity) ?

Why hasn't there been discussion on how to fight Covid? We only hear about Ventilators?

Why isn't endoscopy removal of the Fungus in the lungs just as discussed in the media as Ventilators ?

How long should a Drug Company take to do an End of Life Study on a new Vaccine ? ....

I know someone in the Medical field, and they basically say things don't really add up.

On the flip side, wouldn't the Medical community want a large control group, so those how don't get the Vax can
be a study group ! Right ? So why is the GOVERNMENT so hell bent on FORCING everyone to get it ?...
 
Jodi O'Malley, a masters prepared registered nurse and apparently one of her co-workers, decided to make some secret recordings at the hospital they work at and hand them over to Project Veritas. James O'Keefe interviews O'Malley, who gets very emotional at times, as they both watch some of the footage they recorded.

This is only part 1:



It would be nice if those on the left could comment on the piece instead of the usual attack Project Veritas and then dismiss the video.

.

Exactly what is there to comment on? A single nurse and doctor had an outburst declaring the vaccine dangerous and saying that everyone is lying about it?

These vaccines have been used hundreds of millions of times around the country and around the world. If they have high levels of serious side effects then that means that doctors and nurses all around the globe are either ignoring them or lying about them. I can't think of any good reason why I should trust a random doctor who quite frankly comes across as a little hysterical in the video over the vast majority of doctors and experts.

This video was only created because there are people who are interested in wading through the mountains of doctors and scientists who say the vaccine is very safe and effective in order to find the tiny handful of doctors who say otherwise. Does anyone really think that all of the doctors around the globe are seeing really bad reactions but not coming home and telling their friends and family and loved ones not to take the vaccine? Unless there is actual proof, you'd have to be nuts to believe a single hysterical nurse and doctor over the mountains of studies and evidence.
 
LOL - you are the one who posted video in the OP relying on their opinion

and no - I have no idea about the guy in the video I posted and whether I would agree with him politically or not.
He posted INFORMATION so everyone can draw conclusions from it !
The Guy in the Video has done a lot of good for America !
His undercover journalism has lead to Arrests of Criminals, the firing of vile people, and exposed many Crimes !


His work lead to this Criminal being arrested !
 
Maybe you all should try that fish tank shit again as a booster to the ivermectin. Darwin is hungry.
Not something I was proposing nor supporting. Belies the reality that there are therapeutics which are effective at treating COVID.

There was a single idiot who didn't bother to read the label of what he was injesting. Can't do much about someone like that in any regard.
 
Exactly what is there to comment on? A single nurse and doctor had an outburst declaring the vaccine dangerous and saying that everyone is lying about it?

These vaccines have been used hundreds of millions of times around the country and around the world. If they have high levels of serious side effects then that means that doctors and nurses all around the globe are either ignoring them or lying about them. I can't think of any good reason why I should trust a random doctor who quite frankly comes across as a little hysterical in the video over the vast majority of doctors and experts.

This video was only created because there are people who are interested in wading through the mountains of doctors and scientists who say the vaccine is very safe and effective in order to find the tiny handful of doctors who say otherwise. Does anyone really think that all of the doctors around the globe are seeing really bad reactions but not coming home and telling their friends and family and loved ones not to take the vaccine? Unless there is actual proof, you'd have to be nuts to believe a single hysterical nurse and doctor over the mountains of studies and evidence.
Not really. I know some one who got the J&J and with in 5 minutes was in the ER.
They Hospital personnel DID NOT write a VAERS report ! The Victim had to compel them to do it !
So I would assume that the vast majority of people who had a reaction would not know to fill out the report, and if the Hospital let's it slide the data is in the No Adverse Effect column....
 
He posted INFORMATION so everyone can draw conclusions from it !
The Guy in the Video has done a lot of good for America !
His undercover journalism has lead to Arrests of Criminals, the firing of vile people, and exposed many Crimes !


His work lead to this Criminal being arrested !



conclusion… some people will buy any bullshit to support their political position
 
Ok, how long were the trials for these "Vaccines" ? Less than a year right ?
Isn't it common to have 10year trials ?
No. That is the normal total development time. Much of the development that went into these vaccines was done in response to SARS and MERS some time ago. The gene sequencing required for this particular virus took 3 days.

Trials typically last 2-4 years. The Ebola vaccine was in trials for less than 12 months.
 
No. That is the normal total development time. Much of the development that went into these vaccines was done in response to SARS and MERS some time ago. The gene sequencing required for this particular virus took 3 days.

Trials typically last 2-4 years. The Ebola vaccine was in trials for less than 12 months.
No need for any ivermectin trials though. Just a right wing pundits mention will do.
 
No need for any ivermectin trials though. Just a right wing pundits mention will do.

I'm okay with this. Right wingers don't need all that poop in them. Now it will get out.
 
As expected... 7 people comment, and not one of them addressed what the nurse recorded or what she had to say.

.
She is a off the wall nut case and a liar. There, happy now?
 
Wait hospitals manipulate their stats? I’m shocked
 
Wow... The video was released this afternoon and already has 1.2 million views... In anticipation of her being fired for speaking out, Project Veritas set up a go-fund-me page for Jodi and it's already raised more than $60,000.

This tells me that people are thirsting for real information about the virus and the vaccine, because we sure as hell aren't getting all the facts from the government, the Biden Administration, or the mainstream news media.

.
It's not unusual for porn to garner lots of views.
 
I had covid so I'm trusting my natural immunity until I hear of mass clusters of people getting it twice. It is the mRNA technology that concerns me.....untested on a large scale.....until now. I don't criticize other people who get the vaccine though. If I wouldn't have had covid I'd be more inclined to get it.
How would evaluate this?
 
I'm being supportive and letting them get through this first. When they've recovered I'm going to give them a thorough ass chewing for taking this horrible risk so unnecessarily.
You were not berating them before they caught it?? Telling them they were evil?
 
Wow... The video was released this afternoon and already has 1.2 million views... In anticipation of her being fired for speaking out, Project Veritas set up a go-fund-me page for Jodi and it's already raised more than $60,000.

This tells me that people are thirsting for real information about the virus and the vaccine, because we sure as hell aren't getting all the facts from the government, the Biden Administration, or the mainstream news media.

.
They’re thirsting for “alternative facts” and self affirming conspiracy theories, not “real” information. And we already knew there were millions of suckers out there.
 
How would evaluate this?
I don't understand this question. Don't we gather data for every case?
Also, I've seen stories on mainstream media that the testing period was 10 years. When did that change?
 
So instead of forming your own opinion, you rely on the opinion of someone else that you agree with politically.

Why bother posting if you're unable to express your own thoughts?

.
Do you read what you post?
 
And yet, we're seeing the results of COVID right now...




What exactly is the "share of risk"? You're making suppositions without evidence.
Is it POSSIBLE that there are side effects to the vaccine that we do not know about? Absolutely.
Yes, there have been adverse reactions to the inoculation. I'm not going to dwell on anything non-serious.

As of December 23, 2020, a reported 1,893,360 first doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine had been administered in the United States, and reports of 4,393 (0.2%) adverse events after receipt of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine had been submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Among these, 175 case reports were identified for further review as possible cases of severe allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction that does occur rarely after vaccination, with onset typically within minutes to hours (3). Twenty-one cases were determined to be anaphylaxis (a rate of 11.1 per million doses administered), including 17 in persons with a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, seven of whom had a history of anaphylaxis. The median interval from vaccine receipt to symptom onset was 13 minutes (range = 2–150 minutes). Among 20 persons with follow-up information available, all had recovered or been discharged home. Of the remaining case reports that were determined not to be anaphylaxis, 86 were judged to be nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions, and 61 were considered nonallergic adverse events. Seven case reports were still under investigation. This report summarizes the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of case reports of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis and nonanaphylaxis allergic reactions, after receipt of the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine during December 14–23, 2020, in the United States. CDC has issued updated interim clinical considerations for use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines currently authorized in the United States (4) and interim considerations for preparing for the potential management of anaphylaxis (5). In addition to screening for contraindications and precautions before administering COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine locations should have the necessary supplies available to manage anaphylaxis, should implement postvaccination observation periods, and should immediately treat persons experiencing anaphylaxis signs and symptoms with intramuscular injection of epinephrine (4,5).
Also

Myocarditis and Pericarditis After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination​

Updated Sept. 8, 2021
CDC and its partners are actively monitoring reports of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination. Active monitoring includes reviewing data and medical records and evaluating the relationship to COVID-19 vaccination.
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. In both cases, the body’s immune system causes inflammation in response to an infection or some other trigger. Learn more about myocarditis and pericarditis.external icon Seek medical care if you or your child have symptoms of these conditions within a week after COVID-19 vaccination.
 
and also

About one in 100,000 people receiving the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine have experienced a clotting disorder known as thrombotic thrombocytopenia, including 79 cases among more than 20 million people receiving this vaccine in the United Kingdom, and 19 deaths. A smaller number of cases have occurred with Johnson & Johnson's vaccine as well, Goepfert said. "The causes are still being worked out, but when this happens it occurs from six days to two weeks after vaccination," he said. (See the CDC summary and FAQs on Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine here. See a study on these cases in the AstraZeneca vaccine in the New England Journal of Medicine here and a report from the British government’s regulatory agency here.)
So, yes, receiving the vaccine come with it's own share of risk.
But a POSSIBLE side effect that we don't even have reason to believe actually exists, isn't much of a "risk". Unvaccinated COVID, however...has serious risks.
I never took the position that being un-vaccinated against didn't come with it's share of risks.
What ever happened to personal responsibility? With someone making a decision, but there are also consequences to the decisions that they make?
Those vaccinated, with 'a high degree of protection', so low risk, demanding that those who are not vaccinated be excommunicated from society is unreasonable and being unreasonably risk-averse.
 
Wrong ! or just a liberal liar
10 - 15 years (Typically)
 
I don't understand this question. Don't we gather data for every case?
Also, I've seen stories on mainstream media that the testing period was 10 years. When did that change?
I had covid so I'm trusting my natural immunity until I hear of mass clusters of people getting it twice.
Your words. What is a "mass cluster" and what criteria will you use to evaluate it?
 
Wrong ! or just a liberal liar
10 - 15 years (Typically)
often
 
Back
Top Bottom