As I quoted
But the Quran chapter 53 verses 2-5 say: "Your companion [Muhammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred, Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination. It is not but a revelation revealed, Taught to him by one intense in strength -"
I don't know what is the matter with you. It says: "Al-Bukhaari (1729) and Muslim (2391) narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No woman should travel except with a mahram.”"
I do and I could list the crimes of Israel for pages and pages and pages. But I'm sure you're familiar with them already.
Narratives.
If you're going take that path, I can quote anything from the Quran and you can call it hearsay, but unfortunately for you, we're not discussing your opinion of the past, but the Islamic doctrine. There is no avoiding the fact that a major part of Islamic doctrine is what is found in the authentic hadiths. Whether you like them or not and believe them or not is irrelevant.
You seemingly haven't been able to decide yet if you're angry at hamas, Islamic doctrine or those who practice Islam? It appears obvious you hate hamas for the fact that they seemingly practice Islam and you wouldn't like Palestinians to be encouraged to practice Islam either.
Never argued that. I commented that the ruling is more or less aligned with Islam. You denied that. The discussion after that has been about whether it is Islamic or not.
I have not used the word islamophobia and I don't see any need for it. I simply stated that it is clear you don't like Islam. Am I wrong? I find it odd that you can't be upfront about your beliefs.
What is my "false narrative"? What did I say that was wrong? What did I ignore?
I wouldn't trust you to "defend islam" since you have denied a simple ruling I have presented with evidence and called an authentic hadith hearsay. Would not someone so ignorant do more damage than good?
Well, how else are primitive weak males supposed to exert their supposed superiority and control over women?
Well no one says that...
Hadiths were written and taught at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
No one does..
Hadiths were taught and written down during the time of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam).
Is this because you were forced to deny that one authentic hadith about Medina being called Medina? You have taken a sharp turn on your rethoric. I don't imagine it lasts long.
Right, I suppose you have made it clear you at least pretend to be angry at hamas — and why not? But you do not say anything direct about Islam.
What is it? Just so I know what you're talking about in the future.
You implied I had or that it was somehow in the background of my comments while I barely ever use the word.
What kind of an attack would that be? The forum is full of people who have an intense dislike to Islam/religion/morals. Why would I "attack" you for that if I was to "attack" you for anything? It isn't my problem if you don't like Islam. It is your problem. I have asked you whether I am wrong or not on that. Have you yet replied? It's a straightforward question.
But you have seemingly agreed with many others that the ruling was bad and that it was unislamic.
You have little to back them up, though, if you have anything.
So... You like Islam and you do believe the hadith is authentic and you agree the ruling aligns more or less with Islam, etc? If that is so, why don't you say so?
You're continuing in complete denial on what Islam is. This is one characteristic of Israeli propaganda and of the behaviour of those who wish to corrupt and demoralize the Muslims. Instead of attacking Islam, they try to distort it so as to corrupt the Muslim societies and communities in order to weaken them because they know Islam makes them strong.
That was the OP, but the OP hasn't returned. After that it has been about whether it aligns with Islam or not. It is significant in order to understand the ruling.
Nothing of subtance here, just a poor attempt to derail the thread