• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Graphic anti-choice ads to run during Superbowl

It's refreshing that at this point in time, prolifers have devolved to the "lunatic fringe" and that the prochoice peeps have evolved into the "silent majority".
 
Uzidoesit said:
It's refreshing that at this point in time, prolifers have devolved to the "lunatic fringe" and that the prochoice peeps have evolved into the "silent majority".
Click to expand...

What exactly do you think "silent" actually means?
 
ksu_aviator said:
Why would you think that is odd?
Click to expand...
Just a few examples that come to mind.
If rights came from nature then polygamy would be lwaful, it was in biblical times too. Gays would be allowed to marry since there is nothing in nature that says otherwise.
Of coure we would be allowed to walk around naked since that is also natural. We wold also have the right to hunt an fish without any restrictions and be allowed to ingest anything we find in nature and cultivate anything that grows in nature.
 
Uzidoesit said:
It's refreshing that at this point in time, prolifers have devolved to the "lunatic fringe" and that the prochoice peeps have evolved into the "silent majority".
Click to expand...

Dead wrong again:

lwakhjsuukwsddcfuan-rq.gif


Americans Still Split Along "Pro-Choice," "Pro-Life" Lines

Most people think it should never be legal or only legal in a few exceptions (i.e. rape, incest, medical necessity, etc). The pro-life crowd's belief that abortion out of convenience is acceptable, but 51% of Americans think that is morally wrong.

t7ucaujhge6gjya1zwan6q.gif




What would be truly sad is if banning the killing of children would be a fringe position.
 
prometeus said:
Just a few examples that come to mind.
If rights came from nature then polygamy would be lwaful, it was in biblical times too. Gays would be allowed to marry since there is nothing in nature that says otherwise.
Of coure we would be allowed to walk around naked since that is also natural. We wold also have the right to hunt an fish without any restrictions and be allowed to ingest anything we find in nature and cultivate anything that grows in nature.
Click to expand...

I don't think you know the definition of natural rights.

What is natural rights? definition and meaning

Just because it is done in nature, doesn't mean it is a natural right.
 
ksu_aviator said:
I don't think you know the definition of natural rights.
Click to expand...
I don't think you understand what is written there. Just a sample:
"Although there is no unanimity as to which right is natural and which is not..." which renders your concept what?

Just because it is done in nature, doesn't mean it is a natural right.
Click to expand...
So where is the definitive list and who made it?
 
Last edited:
prometeus said:
I don't think you understand what is written there. Just a sample:
"Although there is no unanimity as to which right is natural and which is not..." which renders your concept what?

So where is the definitive list and who made it?
Click to expand...

Just like there is no unanimity to what is a person and what is not....hmm.
 
Hmm...seems like the vast majority of people have consistently been somewhere in the middle...

rthdip0d3ukn2c9amqdldq.gif
 
mac said:
Just like there is no unanimity to what is a person and what is not....hmm.
Click to expand...
Yea just like that. So why force a belief on people instead of letting everyone decide matters of conscience for themselves?
 
prometeus said:
Yea just like that. So why force a belief on people instead of letting everyone decide matters of conscience for themselves?
Click to expand...

Like whether or not it should be acceptable to shoot the guy that cut you off on the way home from work?
 
Statistics can be skewed to show almost anything and everything. You know, like smoking cigarettes is good for you. Pay no mind to stats, unless you want to be underwhelmed with someones opinions.

Publish or perish mentality is just that.
 
To sum up, graphic ads during the superbowl will do nothing to change anyones mind about abortions. It will only serve to show that prohavababy for me types are spending money for advertising.

Who went running to the mods to cry about my photo of the woman who died during an illegal abortion? Crying all the way to the OP. Nice. Chicken****.
 
Uzidoesit said:
To sum up, graphic ads during the superbowl will do nothing to change anyones mind about abortions. It will only serve to show that prohavababy for me types are spending money for advertising.

Who went running to the mods to cry about my photo of the woman who died during an illegal abortion? Crying all the way to the OP. Nice. Chicken****.
Click to expand...

Nice to see this thread has degenerated to the "you're a tattle-tale (tell?), thbbbbbt" stage. LOL
 
mac said:
Where ya been? I just did. It's explained in the 5th, which is within "The Bill of rights"

and then again, in the 14th.
Click to expand...

I know where they are...but cite the context in relationship to a fetus...
 
**** like this is the type of thing that turns me off of any movement. This isn't going to win people to your side, its going to drive people who agree with you into being less likely to actually push their support for the issue.
 
Zyphlin said:
**** like this is the type of thing that turns me off of any movement. This isn't going to win people to your side, its going to drive people who agree with you into being less likely to actually push their support for the issue.
Click to expand...

Yeah, advocacy always works so much better when it's completely hidden and silent.
 
mac said:
It's not a parasitic growth. It's a human organism with distinct human DNA. One does not "learn" life. It's as simple as that.
Click to expand...

Your snot has distinct human DNA. does that make it human? Humans are more than DNA, aren't they? And it takes more to be human than just being alive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom