- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 28,721
- Reaction score
- 6,738
- Location
- Redneck Riviera
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/us/politics/29beck.html?_r=1Washington officials do not make crowd estimates, but NBC News estimated the turnout at 300,000, while Mr. Beck offered a range of 300,000 to 650,000. By any measure it was a large turnout.
By any measure it was a large turnout.
Lotta crowd-size envy these days...
The size of the crowd doesn't matter. The validity of the facts does. Beck has already been shown to have lied on more than one occasion, willfully and blatantly.
The size of the crowd does matter. They're all voters and for every one person, there's probably twenty that think the same way.
The size of the crowd does matter. They're all voters and for every one person, there's probably twenty that think the same way.
There were enough people there to warrant some serious pants ****ting by the Democrats.
I thought Beck said it was about religion and honor, but you're saying politics? Darn I guess Beck lied again!
It was non-political. Ask Catz. She lost our bet.
So Apdst is talking out of his butt again? :mrgreen:
NBC is estimating the crowd at 300,000. I've read several reports that the CBS estimate was laughable.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/us/politics/29beck.html?_r=1
So by your math and the estimates.
96 000 = 1 920 000 Voters.
300 000 = 6 000 000 Voters.
500 000 = 10 000 000 Voters.
Doesn't seem like a game changer to me.
Sharptons coming on O'Reilly in a few minutes. Maybe bill will ask him to make a guess.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?