I understand what you say. Nonetheless, though justified, the US and world response resulted in WW2. Like Japan and Germany, Russia has territorial ambition. I don't see Putin giving in but for internal forces, such as the oligarchs and others high-up in the governance of Russia.
I understand what YOU say too, only I just don't believe it was only our response, sorry.
Reparations for WW1 were a joint decision by the USA and a BUNCH of other countries, the
Allied Powers,
France,
Britain,
Russia,
Italy,
Japan,
and the
United States.
You're taking the
Keynesian view,
as am I, but
French Marshal Ferdinand Foch actually believed Germany needed to cease being even a republic, it had been a monarchy but Foch didn't even want to allow
Germany to claim any sovereignty at all...to the victors go the spoils, and Foch "took up a lot of oxygen" with his demands that Germany be rendered a collection of colonies ruled by the Allies.
I just don't think we're
the only responsible party.
Woodrow Wilson did not directly dictate the terms of the Versailles treaty, he authored
the Fourteen Points. That was his contribution.
It's interesting to note, by the way,
that Ukraine did NOT receive the support it needed from the Allies at this point in time.
I believe this was a mistake...your mileage may vary.
But I cannot refer to the machinations of Germany, Japan or Russia as simple territorial ambition, any more than I could the violent and colonial takeovers of the United States a few decades earlier,
with regard to Indian lands and their peoples.
Indeed, there was constant talk in our own councils of state during that time period, of attacking both Canada and Mexico and claiming both as our prize, we even had designs on taking Argentina.