Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 121,662
- Reaction score
- 32,575
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Point proven, thank you.
What do you IMAGINE was proven?
Point proven, thank you.
Notice how you have distinguished a local need for law enforcement resources vs those of the federal government
So do the parents of children murdered by illegal immigrants released by Democratic run jails because they don't care if Americans are murdered and raped.
Then why should the local community have to expend its local tax dollars to do the federal government’s immigration workThe need is greater to keep criminals locked up then monitor a construction zone.
Wow great police resources. Just keeping them in jail till ICE shows up to claim them.
There are many Judges that agree. They are not the ones that get the cases.
The SC spoke on this topic a number of times most recently last year - in a 7-2 decision that Alito wrote the majority opinion on - and has steadfastly protected the right of states as sovereign entities to not have to federal federal law or federal policy choices.
So what other district or appellate judges think is relevant. The SC makes it the law of the land.
Then we are talking about two different things. The federal government has the clear right to decide who is a citizen and how they become one. To what are you referring?
The topic of the thread. Whether or not localities have to cooperate with federal law enforcement efforts or support federal policy choices.
They do not.
...unless they accept federal money, that is.
The stupidity of that question is apparent... The average frosh will have real ID as well.
And???
Then why should the local community have to expend its local tax dollars to do the federal government’s immigration work
And then ONLY if the federal dollars are conditioned on them doing so.
Crossed the border today. Took close to an hour in line. Interrogation, inspection if documents (passport, driver's license) ran license plate. Let me pass. Not that differently than had I come illegally as it turns out.
Luckily I didn't have any Crown Royal on board.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
And... I'm still trying to find an answer to my original question - how are the police supposed to know someone is an illegal alien?
The way I figure it, you bring them into custody, you photograph'em... you fingerprint'em. You run their prints through AFIS and if they have no outstanding felony warrants, well, there's not much basis to treat them any differently than anyone else, is there?
Its called prioritizing resources to remove criminals
If they've broken the law? We can offer them a free ride back to Mexico, or a free bed in one of our cozy prisons.Because the Republican party has nothing to offer them?
Not according to the democrats. Democrats virtually see them as "votes" over "people."They're generally pretty conservative and a lot of them are catholic.
If they've broken the law? We can offer them a free ride back to Mexico, or a free bed in one of our cozy prisons.
Not according to the democrats. Democrats virtually see them as "votes" over "people."
Because the Republican party has nothing to offer them?
Well, I guess, if you believe what you read on conservative media.
Wait....you think Jews are illegal aliens? Or that they are committing crimes that then require protection by corrupt politicians? What other antisemitic hatred do you have of Jews?Replace the words "criminal invaders" with "Jews," "ICE" with "the Gestapo," and "deported" with "taken away." Then reread the sentence.
If they've broken the law? We can offer them a free ride back to Mexico, or a free bed in one of our cozy prisons.
Not according to the democrats. Democrats virtually see them as "votes" over "people."
Ya and I said they should be followed by local police officers, The person I was responding to thinks cops don't have the time to hold someone they already have in jail for an extra 48 hours so an ICE agent and pick them up.
as has been demonstrated within this thread, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DO NOT HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO FULFILL THE FEDERAL OBLIGATION OF ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS
there is no such priority for local governments when it comes to immigration enforcement