• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Zimmerman: Prelude to a shooting

Oh yes it will. That tape will be played over and over for the jury.

Unless there is other recordings that we don't know about then Zimmerman is the only one heard swearing in an angry tone that night.

If Martin has smarted off to the convenience clerk that night you know that would be being discussed here to show that Martin was in an angry mood.

Have you heard the tape?
 
Have you heard the tape?

on the tape, he calls Martin a "****ing punk" and an "asshole" who was "high..or something".

the jury will hear this tape, again and again, and Zimmerman's state of mind will be clear to all.
 
Correct!
Yes he did!
Its simple common-sense to understand that he said such things.

its not my fault that your bias has put you in a state of total denial with this issue.

Was this remark directed to Martin? Are you 100% sure?
 
Have you heard the tape?

Yes. The jury will hear that tape repeartedly.

Trying to deny that he was referring to Martin is nothing but mental masturbation here. Did you really expect Zimmerman to say, "Trayvon Martin is a "f--king a--hole" ?

It is really all going to boil down to what the jury thinks not us.
 
Yes. The jury will hear that tape repeartedly.

Trying to deny that he was referring to Martin is nothing but mental masturbation here. Did you really expect Zimmerman to say, "Trayvon Martin is a "f--king a--hole"?...

:lamo:lamo:lamo

because he ddin't refer to Trayvon Martin by name, he clearly was referring to the other tall young black male he was pursuing.

:)
 
on the tape, he calls Martin a "****ing punk" and an "asshole" who was "high..or something".

the jury will hear this tape, again and again, and Zimmerman's state of mind will be clear to all.
:lamo:doh:lamo:doh


What he said is explainable.

You have failed because you can not distinguish or discern between statements made in reference to the general situation and statements directed at the individual person.

Your bias is such that you can not see the truth. It is either that or your thought processes.

You already know that Zimmerman made those remarks in general. Obviously out of frustration as to what he thought the situation was.
Not directly at Trayvon.
To say he called Trayvon those things, is convoluted thinking, and grasping to the extreme.



as you have already stated that you too would have pursued Martin, as he seemed like a criminal suspect to you aswell.
You might want to go back and reread what I said.

And you wonder why others question your thought processes. :doh



Yes. The jury will hear that tape repeartedly.

Trying to deny that he was referring to Martin is nothing but mental masturbation here. Did you really expect Zimmerman to say, "Trayvon Martin is a "f--king a--hole" ?

It is really all going to boil down to what the jury thinks not us.
No they wont hear it repeatedly.
The statements made are explainable.
Since they are, the prosecutor will look mighty foolish if she tries to play them repeatedly for a jury. If this even makes it to a jury.
She will in effect, be insulting their intelligence.
 
on the tape, he calls Martin a "****ing punk" and an "asshole" who was "high..or something".

the jury will hear this tape, again and again, and Zimmerman's state of mind will be clear to all.

Swear words in a courtroom let the jury get a glmpse of the tone of the night.

When I was in a jury for a rape trial the young female plantiff told the court how the defendent's mood suddently turned from friendly to animal when he said " f--king bitch"... You were given another side of the defendent.
 
Swear words in a courtroom let the jury get a glmpse of the tone of the night.

When I was in a jury for a rape trial the young female plantiff told the court how the defendent's mood suddently turned from friendly to animal when he said " f--king bitch"... You were given another side of the defendent.
:lamo:lamo:lamo
Typical human reaction.
 
Swear words in a courtroom let the jury get a glmpse of the tone of the night.

When I was in a jury for a rape trial the young female plantiff told the court how the defendent's mood suddently turned from friendly to animal when he said " f--king bitch"... You were given another side of the defendent.

You lost me here, dude

What exactly does this tidbit have to do with, the GZ case?
 
oh, I comprehend what you're doing very well. We all do.
You obviously don't.

Because you got this; says the guy who says he would have done EXACTLY what Zimmerman did.

From this: I would probably do everything Zimmerman did to get this suspicious guy checked out.
:roll::doh:roll::doh
:lamo
 
You obviously don't.

Because you got this; says the guy who says he would have done EXACTLY what Zimmerman did.

From this: I would probably do everything Zimmerman did to get this suspicious guy checked out.
:roll::doh:roll::doh
:lamo

right, so you would have done what Zimmerman did.

hence your clear bias....and inability to see the facts.
 
right, so you would have done what Zimmerman did.

hence your clear bias....and inability to see the facts.
:doh
Sigh . . .
Wrong!

There is no bias in seeing the facts as they are.
Facts of course, being something you didn't even know about. lol

I would probably do everything Zimmerman did to get this suspicious guy checked out.


There is nothing biased about trying to have doing the above.
Only an idiot would think there was.

There is nothing illegal with the above.
Only an idiot would think there was.

Doing the above is what many people would do.
Only an idiot would think they wouldn't.
Only an idiot would think doing the above is an uncommon thing.



The only uncommon and illegal thing that happened in Zimmerman's instance, is Trayvon's actions.
 
Last edited:
Why didn't Martin just go home while Zimmerman was on the phone if Zim was a threat?

Why didn't Martin call 911 *if* Zimmerman was a threat?

Why? Lotsa time and room to get away.....Why?
Because he was looking for his trophy scalp to show to his friends. Or to Liberals, who love it when guards get mugged. What a hero's attention he could have gotten if he had only been wounded! Poster child for gangsta punks. In these weakling times, "Go ahead, make my day" is said to those who protect law and order. Expect designers to come out with a hot-selling Trayvon-brand hoodie.
 
Because he was looking for his trophy scalp to show to his friends. Or to Liberals, who love it when guards get mugged. What a hero's attention he could have gotten if he had only been wounded! Poster child for gangsta punks. In these weakling times, "Go ahead, make my day" is said to those who protect law and order. Expect designers to come out with a hot-selling Trayvon-brand hoodie.

That comment suggests that you're not a very nice person. Here's a chance to redeem yourself: How do you feel about the Trayvon Martin target being sold at gun ranges?


For the record, Martin was trying to go home when he was accosted and shot by Zimmerman.
 
That comment suggests that you're not a very nice person. Here's a chance to redeem yourself: How do you feel about the Trayvon Martin target being sold at gun ranges?


For the record, Martin was trying to go home when he was accosted and shot by Zimmerman.
To me, Martin was a typical hot-headed feral gangsta. Put a bull's eye on him! If your side wins this case, burglars and muggers will have a blank check to go about their business undisturbed.
 
To me, Martin was a typical hot-headed feral gangsta. Put a bull's eye on him! If your side wins this case, burglars and muggers will have a blank check to go about their business undisturbed.

He was a burglar and mugger? Please continue embarrassing yourself.
 
For the record, Martin was trying to go home when he was accosted and shot by Zimmerman.

Really.... So you know of an eye witness who saw this? Or is there a surveillance video showing that it was Zimmerman who accosted Martin?

Either way, could you please post a link to that information? Unless of course, you are just another in a long line of Martin supporters who make wild and unsubstantiated accusations to prop up their beliefs... If that's the case, welcome to mainstream political left, where that kind of dishonesty is not only condoned, but seems to be encouraged.
 
Back
Top Bottom