Justice44
New member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2010
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 4
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Many believe that the alleged notion that gay men have higher sex drive and desire for more multiple than another sexual orientation proves that men desire promiscuity than women.
What this assertion ignores is the fact that homosexual sex does not produce. The theory defines gay promiscuity from a theory of reproduction which is directed at straight men. Gay men are not spreading their seed in order to spread their genes because; gay men are incapable of procreation. I find it baffling that gay men careless support this theory when it subtly indicates that homosexual males are unintended mutation rather than a deliberate creation. In other words, the sexual orientation of gay men is a genetic accident but what is not a genetic accident is their desire to have sex with hundreds of partners. What these proponents of this view ignore is that they explicitly believe that homosexuality has a genetic justification. Thus, they are presenting contradicting views.
I do not believe that those who use the alleged hyper sexed gay sex drive as evidence of men desiring to spread their seed are homophobic or heterosexist. They are simply trying to find a reason to explain the why straight males are perceived to have a significantly greater desire for multiple partners than their female counterparts. What I find brutally careless in this assumption is the brutal fact that gay men CAN NOT be motivated to have sex based on reproductive reasons. They have no ability to reproduce! Therefore, people should refrain from using the alleged higher rates of promiscuity and sexual desire in the gay community in order to explain the alleged sexual desires associated with straight men.
In order to encourage discussion, answer the following questions;
1. Can we attribute another cause to gay men having higher sex drives and having more partners?
2. Does homosexual sex clearly prove that sexuality is beyond procreative purposes?
3. Why would someone use the alleged promiscuity of gay males as evidence of men wanting to spread their seed and carry on their genes when gay men are unable to produce children?
What this assertion ignores is the fact that homosexual sex does not produce. The theory defines gay promiscuity from a theory of reproduction which is directed at straight men. Gay men are not spreading their seed in order to spread their genes because; gay men are incapable of procreation. I find it baffling that gay men careless support this theory when it subtly indicates that homosexual males are unintended mutation rather than a deliberate creation. In other words, the sexual orientation of gay men is a genetic accident but what is not a genetic accident is their desire to have sex with hundreds of partners. What these proponents of this view ignore is that they explicitly believe that homosexuality has a genetic justification. Thus, they are presenting contradicting views.
I do not believe that those who use the alleged hyper sexed gay sex drive as evidence of men desiring to spread their seed are homophobic or heterosexist. They are simply trying to find a reason to explain the why straight males are perceived to have a significantly greater desire for multiple partners than their female counterparts. What I find brutally careless in this assumption is the brutal fact that gay men CAN NOT be motivated to have sex based on reproductive reasons. They have no ability to reproduce! Therefore, people should refrain from using the alleged higher rates of promiscuity and sexual desire in the gay community in order to explain the alleged sexual desires associated with straight men.
In order to encourage discussion, answer the following questions;
1. Can we attribute another cause to gay men having higher sex drives and having more partners?
2. Does homosexual sex clearly prove that sexuality is beyond procreative purposes?
3. Why would someone use the alleged promiscuity of gay males as evidence of men wanting to spread their seed and carry on their genes when gay men are unable to produce children?