- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I have a poster who says that fully auto weapons made after 1986 are not effectively banned.
Is he right?
Is he right?
I tried to tell himNo...
(o)
(1)
Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun.
(2)This subsection does not apply with respect to—
(A)
a transfer to or by, or possession by or under the authority of, the United States or any department or agency thereof or a State, or a department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or
(B)
any lawful transfer or lawful possession of a machinegun that was lawfully possessed before the date this subsection takes effect.
18 U.S. Code § 922 - Unlawful acts
www.law.cornell.edu
I have a poster who says that fully auto weapons made after 1986 are not effectively banned.
Is he right?
Federal law prohibits the possession of newly manufactured machine guns, but permits the transfer of machine guns lawfully owned prior to May 19, 1986, if the transfer is approved by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives. As a result, a substantial number of machine guns are still in circulation. As of February 2018, the national registry of machine guns contained registrations for 638,260 machine guns.1
Meh... some people live in a fantasy world...I tried to tell him
Yes guns made prior to 1986 are fine with the appropriate documentationThis is what I found:
Machine Guns, Trigger Activators & 50 Caliber Weapons
Machine guns, trigger activators, and bump stocks can cause destruction. The government does not regulate all military-grade firearms.giffords.org
Which means, that unless the law is changed, those 638,260 machine guns are the maximum legally in circulation in the US...This is what I found:
Machine Guns, Trigger Activators & 50 Caliber Weapons
Machine guns, trigger activators, and bump stocks can cause destruction. The government does not regulate all military-grade firearms.giffords.org
That's why they are so massively expensiveWhich means, that unless the law is changed, those 638,260 machine guns are the maximum legally in circulation in the US...
That's why they are so massively expensive
If you build nuclear weapons for the government I guess you can say you bbn own one. LolIf you become a dealer of manufacturer you can own them. by definition, they are not banned.
no. we already established in the other threat that that is a moronic comparison. Nuclear weapons are not "arms" as defined in the constitution and supreme court.If you build nuclear weapons for the government I guess you can say you bbn own one. Lol
Thank you for your opinion. We are not discussing what is an arm. Lolno. we already established in the other threat that that is a moronic comparison. Nuclear weapons are not "arms" as defined in the constitution and supreme court.
that you don't know that that is exactly what we are discussing, is why you have no business posting about this topic.Thank you for your opinion. We are not discussing what is an arm. Lol
Yes yes...carry on carry on. LOLthat you don't know that that is exactly what we are discussing, is why you have no business posting about this topic.
always happy to refute your nonsense.Yes yes...carry on carry on. LOL
Even on this thread.....no one seems to agree with you. LOLalways happy to refute your nonsense.
irrelevant. the law is quite clear. Your claim that they are banned is demonstrably false.Even on this thread.....no one seems to agree with you. LOL
No one is buying what you are selling bud. LOLirrelevant. the law is quite clear. Your claim that they are banned is demonstrably false.
irrelevant to the fact I've shown you that your claim is false. I gave you the law showing they are not banned. Just restricted.No one is buying what you are selling bud. LOL
Ho Hum. Nobody believes youirrelevant to the fact I've shown you that your claim is false. I gave you the law showing they are not banned. Just restricted.
you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.Ho Hum. Nobody believes you
Wrongity wrong wrong.you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.
yes, you have been provenwrong.Wrongity wrong wrong.
Too bad no one believes you. Lolyes, you have been provenwrong.