• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fully auto weapons banned

I have a poster who says that fully auto weapons made after 1986 are not effectively banned.


Is he right?

Not banned, but regulated. And depending on where you live, you may enjoy more freedom from regulation than in another place.

Machine guns are fun for the whole family. I'd rather see Americans out at the range enjoying their freedoms this way than watching the news and seeing BLM protestors throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at cops. (the filtered word is c-o-c-k tails, not sure why it is being filtered?)

 
Not banned, but regulated. And depending on where you live, you may enjoy more freedom from regulation than in another place.

Machine guns are fun for the whole family. I'd rather see Americans out at the range enjoying their freedoms this way than watching the news and seeing BLM protestors throwing rocks and Molotov ****tails at cops. (the filtered word is c-o-c-k tails, not sure why it is being filtered?)


Be clear


Can you own a fully auto gun made after 1986?
 
Too bad no one believes you. Lol
you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.
 
you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.
I made this thread as an opportunity for people to support you.


But they know you are lying.


And I enjoy that. Lol
 
I have a poster who says that fully auto weapons made after 1986 are not effectively banned.


Is he right?
I believe you mean before 1986, not after. I believe those weapons pre-date the assault weapons ban, so they are easier to purchase legally, but they are dwindling with time, and their collectible nature makes it unlikely many are actually sold, and guarantees they are extremely expensive.

MUCH easier and cheaper to modify a new weapon for automatic fire but that's illegal, mostly.
 
I believe you mean before 1986, not after. I believe those weapons pre-date the assault weapons ban, so they are easier to purchase legally, but they are dwindling with time, and their collectible nature makes it unlikely many are actually sold, and guarantees they are extremely expensive.

MUCH easier and cheaper to modify a new weapon for automatic fire but that's illegal, mostly.
I meant to say that fully weapons made after 1986 ARE banned.


You are correct
 
Actually everyone is sorta kicking back and watching you make a dumb ass of yourself.
Then answer


Are fully auto weapons made after 1986 effectively banned?
 
Not banned, but regulated. And depending on where you live, you may enjoy more freedom from regulation than in another place.

Machine guns are fun for the whole family. I'd rather see Americans out at the range enjoying their freedoms this way than watching the news and seeing BLM protestors throwing rocks and Molotov ****tails at cops. (the filtered word is c-o-c-k tails, not sure why it is being filtered?)


Yeah I was reading about the filters on the bugs page. Apparently shit is okay now but **** gets filtered.
 
no. we already established in the other threat that that is a moronic comparison. Nuclear weapons are not "arms" as defined in the constitution and supreme court.
I missed the "other thread" but how is it justified the Supreme Court decides definitions? I thought the dictionary did that? The founders wrote the constitution based on definitions at the time, not what the words could or are defined centuries later. Arms are defined as weapons. Does that mean the Supreme Court can define speech as only speech that supports the federal government? Would that be acceptable?
 
Be clear
Firearm Owners’ Protection Act

In 1986, this Act amended the NFA definition of “silencer” by adding combinations of parts for silencers and any part intended for use in the assembly or fabrication of a silencer. The Act also amended the GCA to prohibit the transfer or possession of machine guns. Exceptions were made for transfers of machine guns to, or possession of machine guns by, government agencies, and those lawfully possessed before the effective date of the prohibition, May 19, 1986.



Can you own a fully auto gun made after 1986?

Then answer


Are fully auto weapons made after 1986 effectively banned?

I believe what it says is Indiana rescinded a law saying an 18 year old could have an assault rifle but not a machine gun. Money and connections + FFL talks bullshit walks.
 
Be clear


Can you own a fully auto gun made after 1986?

Depends on who you are. Machine guns manufactured after 1986 can be sold only to law enforcement and government agencies, exported, or held as inventory or "dealer samples" by licensed manufacturers and dealers.
 
Depends on who you are. Machine guns manufactured after 1986 can be sold only to law enforcement and government agencies, exported, or held as inventory or "dealer samples" by licensed manufacturers and dealers.
Yep. Effectively banned
 
Yep. Effectively banned

That isn't what I said. They are conditionally regulated differently post 1986 than before. But it really is a moot point anyway. Even prior to 1986 there were so few machine guns being transferred or sold, not many really cared. Not even the NRA in fact.

So when someone says "effectively banned" that can have several meanings. AR-15s are in their native configurations are "effectively banned" in states like Commiefornia. Doesn't mean they aren't out there.
 
That isn't what I said. They are conditionally regulated differently post 1986 than before. But it really is a moot point anyway. Even prior to 1986 there were so few machine guns being transferred or sold, not many really cared. Not even the NRA in fact.

So when someone says "effectively banned" that can have several meanings. AR-15s are in their native configurations are "effectively banned" in states like Commiefornia. Doesn't mean they aren't out there.

If I told you this law would be applied to a certain type of gun


Only certain types of FFL/SOTs may make them, and then only for purchase by qualified state and federal agencies. There are no exceptions

Every gun person I know would say that gun is effectively banned


In fact if you support that law they call you a gun banner
 
Coke, pot and meth are banned too. Bans work really well in retardo land.
Never said anything about bv them working.
Just that they are a ban


But do you know when the last murder was that used a fully auto gun made after 1986?
 
I made this thread as an opportunity for people to support you.


But they know you are lying.


And I enjoy that. Lol
you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.
 
you keep thinking your belief or anyone else's belief has any bearing on the actual ****ing law I gave you, lol. It does not. You remain refuted.
Opinion noted
 
I have a poster who says that fully auto weapons made after 1986 are not effectively banned.


Is he right?

If it is my neighbors don't know about it or are not complying. I have a neighbor on both sides of me that fire full auto all the time. And yes I know a little bit about guns being a weapons specialist in the military.
 
Back
Top Bottom