Again, everyone is entitles to an opinion, but not everyone is entitled to their own facts.Actually, it’s the first phrase out of the mouth of the most ignorant of climate deniers. I have heard it literally hundreds of times over the years.
Physics, is not just limited to the climate, and AGW comes down to raw physics, if the physics assumptionsPlease list the papers that Dyson has published in regards to AGW. Thanks in advance.
So common sense tells us that human-produced CO2 spewing into the air since the advent of the Industrial Revolution has not long-term consequences for the atmosphere and climate? Really? That’s a very strange claim.
Their predicts told use kids wouldn't know what snow was now, that highways on the coast would've been underwater years ago. Yeah...they haven't turned out very well.
Again, everyone is entitles to an opinion, but not everyone is entitled to their own facts.
Physics, is not just limited to the climate, and AGW comes down to raw physics, if the physics assumptions
used in the models are wrong, the models are wrong.
For Freeman Dyson to question the physics behind AGW, it is like Richard Feynman, or Albert Einstein questioning the physics of something.
That's the key.Look, you brought up Dyson.
And this is what Dyson says in the piece:
The "we" is humans, humans are having an effect of the climate.
Mr. Dyson states he does not believe the effect will be catastrophic, without presenting any evidence, without presenting any data or study. It is just his personal opinion, not backed up by anything, and it does nothing to further the discussion.
I know people who have dedicated their life to in a field, and are still bettered by others new at it.Hansen has basically dedicated his professional life to trying to understand the present climate change and has authored, along with other professionals as co-authors, numerous papers on the subject. Has a Dyson authored any at all? It appears that the is just a dilettante in this regard. Like you.
Yep. He has a much better grasp as the required physics than James Hansen does.Actually Dyson's special experience in Physics, makes him well suited to evaluate the assumptions used, and finding produced by the climate models.
Both He and Hansen have a physics education, Dyson was world class physicist while Hansen was a bureaucrat, and activist.
Yep. He has a much better grasp as the required physics than James Hansen does.
Yale Environment 360 interviews Freeman Dyson:
Freeman Dyson Takes on the Climate Establishment
Princeton physicist Freeman Dyson has been roundly criticized for insisting global warming is not an urgent problem, with many climate scientists dismissing him as woefully ill-informed. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Dyson explains his iconoclastic views and why he believes they...e360.yale.edu
Again the physics of AGW, is the same physics for everything else.Please list the papers published by Dyson re AGW.
Again the physics of AGW, is the same physics for everything else.
His is a logical argument, the models are only as accurate as the assumptions used, and that they have a vested interestI read his interview. He just seems like more of a dilettante regarding AGW than a serious climate scientist.
Fixed: "I read his interview. He just seems like more of a realist regarding AGW than a agenda driven climate scientist."I read his interview. He just seems like more of a dilettante regarding AGW than a serious climate scientist.
Fixed: "I read his interview. He just seems like more of a realist regarding AGW than a agenda driven climate scientist."
Why does that matter?Please list the papers that he has published regarding AGW. Or is he just a dilettante mouthing his uneducated (about AGW) OPINIONS? Please not the portion of his interview where he admits that he is not all that informed about it.
Why does that matter?
Are you an elitist?
Why does that matter?
Are you an elitist?
He was still smart enough to see trhe B.S. presented as fact regarding CO2.Taken from is interview, this is all that you or anyone needs to know about Dyson, in his own words: “I have two great disadvantages. First of all, I am 85 years old. Obviously, I’m an old fuddy-duddy. So, I have no credibility.
And, secondly, I am not an expert, and that’s not going to change. I am not going to make myself an expert.”
Freeman Dyson Takes on the Climate Establishment
Princeton physicist Freeman Dyson has been roundly criticized for insisting global warming is not an urgent problem, with many climate scientists dismissing him as woefully ill-informed. In an interview with Yale Environment 360, Dyson explains his iconoclastic views and why he believes they...e360.yale.edu
He was still smart enough to see trhe B.S. presented as fact regarding CO2.
No predictions were made like that. Why do you peddle falsehoods?
Bwahahahahahahaha!
Then show me.
I think part of the problem is that James Hansen actually believed it when he said it in 1988 or 1989.Stormy weather - Global warming - Salon.com (archive.org)
While doing research 12 or 13 years ago, I met Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress. I went over to the window with him and looked out on Broadway in New York City and said, "If what you're saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years?" He looked for a while and was quiet and didn't say anything for a couple seconds. Then he said, "Well, there will be more traffic." I, of course, didn't think he heard the question right. Then he explained, "The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won't be there. The trees in the median strip will change." Then he said, "There will be more police cars." Why? "Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?