• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Fox News - Hitler?

I was making reference to the definition argexpat provided, Lenin. When we speak of "Liberals" it is the ones who have given the party a black eye. Hollywood "elites", special interest groups like the environmental wackos, politicians to the far left of the Democrats. These liberals do not fit the definition below except for the last one.

"Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.
Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.
Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.
Tending to give freely; generous: a liberal benefactor.
Obsolete. Morally unrestrained; licentious. "
 
26 X World Champs said:
As far as Bowling for Columbine goes, are you suggesting that this Oscar winning film is bogus? Do you actually believe that the availability of guns had nothing to do with the slaughter? You know what? What you have to say on the subject really doesn't matter because you probably haven't watched it either.

First of all, winning an award doesn't mean it is credible. F 9-11 won at Cannes, and that was one of the most incredible pieces of docuganda and :spin: that has ever been put on film.

There are many problems with Bowling, not the least of which include staging scenes and passing them off as real, implying that he got a gun at a bank without a background check, implying that the NRA started as a racist organization, harping on the NRA for having a meeting in CO just days after Columbine when in fact the meeting was scheduled well in advance and HAD to be held according to law, inplying that Charlton Heston visited the town of another gun incident in MI shortly afterward when in fact it was EIGHT MONTHS afterward and just weeks before an election.

There are so many things in Bowling that are lies, distortions, etc. that it simply can not be accepted. I HAVE seen Bowling. I only saw parts of F 9-11 (mostly because that piece of trash is not available here in Taiwan.)
 
Back
Top Bottom