• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FLASHBACK: 30 years ago, Nancy Pelosi demanded Congress confront Chinese tariffs on American goods

No one ever imagined a president with bad intentions toward his own people before.
Oh I agree, no really imagined a major political party would put up a brain damaged would be dictator Kim Jung Biden as their nominee then focus their campaign on him not being the Bad Orange Man. But Democrats did. They even recognized their mistake with a palace coup forcing him out late in the campaign. Of course the replacement Princess Kamala was even more toxic to the Republic.
 
"...............not only do we have problems with China, but we also have problems with our "allies".

Then don't kick your allies in the balls like you did Canada!

Jesus,now you're playing victim after STARTING the fight!
The problems with Canada pre-date the so-called "kick in the balls".

Perhaps y'all deserve it.
 
The problems with Canada pre-date the so-called "kick in the balls".

Perhaps y'all deserve it.
What were the problems with Canada pre-date?
 
What were the problems with Canada pre-date?
Here are a few of them.
  • Dairy Products: High tariffs were applied to milk, cheese, and other dairy items under Canada's supply management system.
  • Poultry and Eggs: Similar to dairy, these were subject to significant tariffs to support Canadian farmers.
  • Clothing: Tariffs averaging around 18% were imposed to protect domestic manufacturers.
  • Sugar and Confectionery: These products faced higher tariffs to regulate imports
 
Oh I agree, no really imagined a major political party would put up a brain damaged would be dictator Kim Jung Biden as their nominee then focus their campaign on him not being the Bad Orange Man. But Democrats did. They even recognized their mistake with a palace coup forcing him out late in the campaign. Of course the replacement Princess Kamala was even more toxic to the Republic.

Immature post.
 
Here are a few of them.
  • Dairy Products: High tariffs were applied to milk, cheese, and other dairy items under Canada's supply management system.
  • Poultry and Eggs: Similar to dairy, these were subject to significant tariffs to support Canadian farmers.
  • Clothing: Tariffs averaging around 18% were imposed to protect domestic manufacturers.
  • Sugar and Confectionery: These products faced higher tariffs to regulate imports

Somehow nothing on that list compares to the problem trump is making it into.
 
Or we could make the point that Pelosi was arguing for CONGRESS to act as a deliberative body who's job it is to consider such tariffs in a bill that gets written in a committee and amended in committee, and sent to a House floor for even more amending, and then goes to the Senate committee which Nancy it, and sends it to the Senate floor for more deliberation, and then if it passes it goes to conference for more consideration... She was not arguing for tariffs by executive order,
The same Nancy Pelosi who worked hand in glove with Dirty Harry Reid to wrangle Obamacare through the House bypassing regular order. The same Nancy Pelosi who replaced Republican choices on the Select Committee with Trump hating RINOs. Who can forget "pass the bill to find out the good things inside" truly an endorsement of regular order.
 
Somehow nothing on that list compares to the problem trump is making it into.
Your opinion. Something not shared by a lot of other Americans.
 
Your opinion. Something not shared by a lot of other Americans.

That's so ad populum,

"And most of them — 70% including nine in 10 Democrats and six in 10 Republicans — said they expected higher tariffs will make groceries and other regular purchases more expensive."


"Some 57% of respondents, including one in three Republicans, said the president’s policies have been unsteady as his efforts to tax imports have set off a global trade war, according to the two-day poll that closed on Wednesday."

 
The same Nancy Pelosi who worked hand in glove with Dirty Harry Reid to wrangle Obamacare through the House bypassing regular order. The same Nancy Pelosi who replaced Republican choices on the Select Committee with Trump hating RINOs. Who can forget "pass the bill to find out the good things inside" truly an endorsement of regular order.
Pelosi was right!

bafkreicnstw3zl4wvj65ohwapk4wispdvqmh33bztpti53tradshfxpima@jpeg
 
The problems with Canada pre-date the so-called "kick in the balls".

Perhaps y'all deserve it.
What “problems” are you referring to?

Please, be specific.
 
The same Nancy Pelosi who worked hand in glove with Dirty Harry Reid to wrangle Obamacare through the House bypassing regular order.
How so?

Be specific.
The same Nancy Pelosi who replaced Republican choices on the Select Committee with Trump hating RINOs.
The “RINOs” were the ones doing their damndest to protect Traitor Trump.
Who can forget "pass the bill to find out the good things inside" truly an endorsement of regular order.
Didn’t happen.

What Pelosi actually said; “"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
 
Oh I agree, no really imagined a major political party would put up a brain damaged would be dictator Kim Jung Biden as their nominee then focus their campaign on him not being the Bad Orange Man. But Democrats did. They even recognized their mistake with a palace coup forcing him out late in the campaign. Of course the replacement Princess Kamala was even more toxic to the Republic.
1. A far right winger like yourself talking shit about Biden being a dictator is hi-****ing-lariously hypocritical to nth degree!! 🤣

2. “Orange Bad Man” is the much, much too gentle, sarcastic euphemism used by Traitor Trump supporters attempting and failing to mock the entirely deserved, much harsher nicknames given by anti-Traitor Trump folks.

3. The United States is not, and never has been a “Republic”.

The United States is a constitutional federal republic.

No special relationship to the “Republican” party.
 
Last edited:
Pelosi was right!

bafkreicnstw3zl4wvj65ohwapk4wispdvqmh33bztpti53tradshfxpima@jpeg
The point is Nancy Pelosi's corruption of regular order to ram Obamacare into law. The false claim is her call for tariffs in the past was a call to implement them following regular order.
 
How so?

Be specific.
I am not going to spoon feed you the sordid history of Democrat corruption pasding Obamacare here. Do some research and start another thread.
The “RINOs” were the ones doing their damndest to protect Traitor Trump.
So you support selecting a panel of rabid anti Trump members of Congress as a legitimate, impartial investigation? In typical dictatorial fashion Pelosi violated the precedent of allowing the minority leader to select members.
Didn’t happen.

What Pelosi actually said; “"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
Passing bills to find out what's in them is a direct repudiation of the legislative process. It is however another example of Democrats enthusiastically undermining regular order.
 
Oh I agree, no really imagined a major political party would put up a brain damaged would be dictator Kim Jung Biden as their nominee then focus their campaign on him not being the Bad Orange Man. But Democrats did. They even recognized their mistake with a palace coup forcing him out late in the campaign. Of course the replacement Princess Kamala was even more toxic to the Republic.
Every accusation....
 

FLASHBACK: 30 years ago, Nancy Pelosi demanded Congress confront Chinese tariffs on American goods​


An old video of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urging Congress to retaliate against China’s tariffs against the United States is going viral for how much it sounds like President Donald Trump’s current tariff policies.

The video, recorded on the House floor in June 1996, featured the lawmaker urging her colleagues to fight against the "status quo" trade policies that had contributed to America’s trade deficit with China. She specifically called on lawmakers to address the fact that American tariffs on Chinese goods paled in comparison to Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods.

"In terms of tariffs, it’s interesting to note that the average U.S. MFN [Most Favored Nation] tariff on Chinese goods coming into the United States is two percent, whereas the average MFN tariff on U.S. goods going into China is 35 percent."

The congresswoman asked, "Is that reciprocal?" She also went on to call the U.S.-China trade relationship a "job loser."..................


And? What is the point you think you are making? That three decades ago under radically different circumstances Nancy Pelosi was concerned about China? Did she propose the President impose massive tariffs at the time on all of our allies and trading partners?
 
I am not going to spoon feed you the sordid history of Democrat corruption pasding Obamacare here. Do some research and start another thread.
You have nothing to support your bullshit claim.

Got it.
So you support selecting a panel of rabid anti Trump members of Congress as a legitimate, impartial investigation?
I support not lying. You should try doing the same.
In typical dictatorial fashion Pelosi violated the precedent of allowing the minority leader to select members.
More @AZRWinger horse shit. Pelosi refused 2 of 5 Reps (Banks and Jordan) nominated by McCarthy because of their connections with the events of January 6th.

Entirely correct/appropriate.
Passing bills to find out what's in them is a direct repudiation of the legislative process. It is however another example of Democrats enthusiastically undermining regular order.
Your purely dumbass lie;
Who can forget "pass the bill to find out the good things inside" truly an endorsement of regular order.
has already been debunked.
 
You have nothing to support your bullshit claim.

Got it.
Denial borne out of ignorance.
I support not lying. You should try doing the same.
I support intelligent, fact based discussion not the childish name calling you engahe in.
More @AZRWinger horse shit. Pelosi refused 2 of 5 Reps (Banks and Jordan) nominated by McCarthy because of their connections with the events of January 6th.

Entirely correct/appropriate.
The issue is Pelosi's blatantly undermining the long standing precedent of having minority leaders appoint members of committees. Kindly explain how Pelosi created a bipartisan committee by hand picking every member. Don't forget what happened to the RINOS she picked wjen they came up for reelection.
Your purely dumbass lie;

has already been debunked.
Kindly explain how passing a bill without knowing what's in it supports regular order without slinging gratuitous insults.
 
that question makes no sense.
Completing your "every accusation" with "is a confession". The fact is Pelosi, Obama, and Clooney were prominent accusers of Biden, ultimately forcing him out.
 
Denial borne out of ignorance.
^ Denial borne out of dishonesty.
I support intelligent, fact based discussion …
Your posting history proves otherwise.
… not the childish name calling you engahe in.
Nothing childish about disparaging those most worthy of disparaging.
The issue is Pelosi's blatantly undermining the long standing precedent of having minority leaders appoint members of committees. …
Your entirely partisan based, wrongheaded assertion has already been noted.
Kindly explain how Pelosi created a bipartisan committee by hand picking every member.
Nothing to explain, as your assertion is false.
Don't forget what happened to the RINOS she picked wjen they came up for reelection.
There were no RINO’s on the January 6th committee. Only patriots.
Kindly explain how passing a bill without knowing what's in it supports regular order without slinging gratuitous insults.
Your blatant lie has already been debunked.

Pelosi never said:
"pass the bill to find out the good things inside"

Pelosi did, in fact/irrefutably say, "We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."
 
Back
Top Bottom