I know the timeline. The point that you and some people who are like-minded continue to miss, regardless of the dossier, is that both the Democrats and the Republicans hired outside firms to research their opponents. If that was wrong, they're all wrong. If it was fine, they're all fine.
If you are telling me that you need a fine tooth comb to find such a bad guy (allegedly) over decades then you have just argued Trumps point that the Elite have failed in their duties.
That plus the man is presumed innocent.
BECAUSE JUSTICE
Technically they took over payments on a dossier originally commissioned by an unnamed republican.
And I'm.pretty sure that once indictments are made the grand jury proceedings are already over, technically.
It's perfectly legal to hire people to research your opponents.
It's not legal to solicit information that was acquired through criminal means, such as hacking your political opponents.
It's also not legal to try to shut down an investigation of your criminal wrong-doing.
Enjoy your Monday.
The prosecutor getting the scalps he wants being of course what matters here, not justice.
This was supposed to be about the election, not routine ancient financial crimes that had nothing to do with the election when they were committed.
That would be abuse of Mueller's mandate, and if he does claim that these crimes have anything to do with the election then he is lying.
And I am not buying "Well Trump is blackmailable" because he does not put up with that, as we all should know.
You better tell that to your buddies...
https://www.google.com/amp/thehill....-reward-in-exchange-for-trump-tax-returns?amp
How could you possibly know the details of any of what you just said?
Having the cat out of the bag on the Fusion thing, the left is reduced to saying that the right did it too. That, unfortunately for them, is not an applicable comparison.
Banks records are forthcoming. Should be interesting, as it seems nobody knows who authorized the multi-million dollar expenditure. And I make a habit of losing track of millions myself all the time. :roll:
Rosenstein appointed Mueller and has the power to fire him, so presumably, Mueller is keeping him apprised of his progress.
That's where you're wrong.
You can't dismiss the importance of the dossier because it was born out of the FUSION contract with Steele and sourced by Russian input.
And reductively the funding of those sources was with laundered Democrat Party money that apparently was not declared as a campaign expense ... that would violate campaign finance laws.
With the Free Beacon and FUSION, there's no evidence that it used anything other than domestic sources.
How could you possibly know the details of any of what you just said?
Technically they took over payments on a dossier originally commissioned by an unnamed republican.
And I'm.pretty sure that once indictments are made the grand jury proceedings are already over, technically.
For one thing, Steele was hired by FUSION in June after the WFB (the website, not the deceased William F) cut loose FUSION in May.
While the Dems hired FUSION in April through their law firm Perkins Coie.
As a humorous aside, half the people on TV who should know better are calling the law firm Perkins COLE and not Perkins COIE.
Lower case "l" and "i" do look similar but still ....
Oh ffs.
Ever consider a clerk of the court doing it for a fat payday?
LOTS of people.know when indictments are filed.
And we've spent decades propagandizing the population that "greed is good".
You got way to many suspects with a motive to be making the claim you are.
Sorry, but they hired the same firm to do two completely different things. Try as you might, there is NO connection between what WFB did and what the Dems did.
Our politicians do increasingly suck, which makes it increasingly unlikely that they will get done what needs to be done for this now very broken America, which had a lot to do with why I was mostly out of interest in politicians from the Clintons's 60 minutes interview about Lewinsky till 9.10.15 when I decided that Trump is different, that Trump might be able to get something done.
He was a sight for sore eyes I assure you.
Come on, y'all...this isn't hidden knowledge. It's not a conspiracy. It's fact. Get straight on this and quit wasting my time.
Fusion GPS and the Washington Free Beacon - Washington Free Beacon
You better tell that to your buddies...
https://www.google.com/amp/thehill....-reward-in-exchange-for-trump-tax-returns?amp
There is nothing in Mueller's authorization letter that requires him to notify Rosenstein. In fact, it says quite the opposite.
The right has a habit of losing a lot more than that.
It's perfectly legal to hire people to research your opponents.
It's not legal to solicit information that was acquired through criminal means, such as hacking your political opponents.
It's also not legal to try to shut down an investigation of your criminal wrong-doing.
Enjoy your Monday.
So? What are you saying? The Clinton campaign hired oppo research firm?
Really--your conspiracy theories and linking to your right wing web sites are no longer working.
Get your coloring books and crayons out--turn on your FOX news, read your Brietbart & Drudge report--make certain to tune into Rush Limbaugh--Sean Hannity and whomever else you listen too, you're in for one hell of a ride.
Really--your conspiracy theories and linking to your right wing web sites are no longer working.
Get your coloring books and crayons out--turn on your FOX news, read your Brietbart & Drudge report--make certain to tune into Rush Limbaugh--Sean Hannity and whomever else you listen too, you're in for one hell of a ride.
So? What are you saying? The Clinton campaign hired oppo research firm?
Remember when I said you're the guy who says BUT BUT BUT HILLARY in 80% of threads, and you asked for a link?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?