Better safe than sorry for Finland.If Stalin himself was happy with a neutral Finland.....why are we to believe that Putin would suddenly invade?
You believe you are anti-war.Every nation should be automatically enrolled in NATO, then there would be no nation left to threaten with the US government's nuclear arsenal, and nuclear weapons will be abolished.
Probably not, but the US government and Russian government are probably too stupid to abolish nuclear weapons just because mutually assured stupidity is insanely stupid.
Well, it's probably more the US government's stupid agenda to dominate what's left of the planet that's the real reason.
Like Trump's America?Not in Russia. In Russia, when a quote from a functionary doesn't reflect the intentions of Vladimir Putin, that functionary is removed and replaced.
I don't see any defence of Putin in the poster's comments. On the contrary I interpret tacit reminders that we in the 'enlightened' West have no moral authority to preach from when it comes to waging wars of aggression and violations of either human rights, international law and the Geneva Conventions, as recent history informs us.Repeatedly demanding evidence that you plainly mean to declare not evidence is just about the dumbest internet tactic out there.
Like...
What's gonna happen if he plays? He collects all the same posts of yours that he based his prior assessment on, and you say for the second time that they are not evidence of Stalinism? And...what... this will cause other people to think that RV has failed to support his claim? As if anyone could possibly think that someone loudly insisting they are not a Stalinist will say "ahhh, I see now, I AM one!" after being reminded of their words?
<><><>
At any rate, I'm not sure what else to call someone who defends a brutal war against innocent civilians because ~900 of them joined a volunteer paramilitary group accused of having neo-nazis beliefs.
Profile: Who are Ukraine’s far-right Azov regiment?
The far-right neo-Nazi group has expanded to be part of Ukraine’s armed forces, a street militia and a political party.www.aljazeera.com
Would you defend the world if it declared war on us and started murdering civilian? We have way more than 900 neo-nazis here. No, of course you would not, because whatever your real reason for defending Putin is, it is not the existence of Azov. It would be wildly insane to defend a murderous invasion of a country of 44,000,000 because it has 900 bad people somewhere in it, so I do not believe that is what you are really doing.
What are you really doing? What's it matter? You're defending evil. The specific label it's given is largely irrelevant.
Yes, but on a whole other level in Russia. Trump admired Vladimir Putin and took plenty of inspiration from his playbook, though Trump was a simple wannabe dictator and couldn't hold a candle to Putin's hold on power.Like Trump's America?
Tracking turnover in the Trump administration
Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.www.brookings.edu
Would you defend the world if it declared war on us and started murdering civilian? We have way more than 900 neo-nazis here. No, of course you would not, because whatever your real reason for defending Putin is, it is not the existence of Azov. It would be wildly insane to defend a murderous invasion of a country of 44,000,000 because it has 900 bad people somewhere in it, so I do not believe that is what you are really doing.
What are you really doing? What's it matter? You're defending evil. The specific label it's given is largely irrelevant.
Repeatedly demanding evidence that you plainly mean to declare not evidence is just about the dumbest internet tactic out there.
Like...
What's gonna happen if he plays? He collects all the same posts of yours that he based his prior assessment on, and you say for the second time that they are not evidence of Stalinism? And...what... this will cause other people to think that RV has failed to support his claim? As if anyone could possibly think that someone loudly insisting they are not a Stalinist will say "ahhh, I see now, I AM one!" after being reminded of their words?
<><><>
At any rate, I'm not sure what else to call someone who defends a brutal war against innocent civilians because ~900 of them joined a volunteer paramilitary group accused of having neo-nazis beliefs.
Profile: Who are Ukraine’s far-right Azov regiment?
The far-right neo-Nazi group has expanded to be part of Ukraine’s armed forces, a street militia and a political party.www.aljazeera.com
Would you defend the world if it declared war on us and started murdering civilian? We have way more than 900 neo-nazis here. No, of course you would not, because whatever your real reason for defending Putin is, it is not the existence of Azov. It would be wildly insane to defend a murderous invasion of a country of 44,000,000 because it has 900 bad people somewhere in it, so I do not believe that is what you are really doing.
What are you really doing? What's it matter? You're defending evil. The specific label it's given is largely irrelevant.
The Tigerace117 agenda.... due to Nazi collaborator Stephan Bandera's actions during WWII, and the private/volunteer Azov Battalion in 2014, Putin is entitled to invade Ukraine, level cities, and kill thousands including children.
This is akin to justifying the destruction of the entire United States due the misdeeds of Nathan Bedford Forrest and today's Proud Boys.
If Stalin himself was happy with a neutral Finland.....why are we to believe that Putin would suddenly invade?
Yes, because they aren’t in Ukraine’s situation, and Russia has nothing to attack them over.
Gee, I must have missed when we started actively recruiting our Neo Nazis into the Army. <>
Ummm . . .
That's kinda what the extremist purge is about. We do. We did.
Ummm . . .
That's kinda what the extremist purge is about. We do. We did.
Point-blank, exactly how much does your defense of Putin's invasion go? You keep responding to everything about Azov. We have more neo-nazis, yes we have them in our military, and no their existence in Ukraine or its military (like a thousand guys...seriously) does not justify a damned thing Putin would do. There are too many reasons your position is wrong.
The easiest is that your rationale would justify world invasion of America. We have more and in similar places. That is a stupid rationale.
He invents the idiotic Banderas/Azov rationale to mask his pro-Putin agenda.
Too bad for you you can’t actually support any of your constant flailing.
Psychological projection.
I agree with this from a former top Finnish minister:Better safe than sorry for Finland.
What is the risk of Finland joining NATO.?
Is the risk of being a NATO member less or greater than being neutral - and without the protect of the most powerful military force in the world?
I mentioned this in an earlier thread.Better safe than sorry for Finland.
What is the risk of Finland joining NATO.?
Is the risk of being a NATO member less or greater than being neutral - and without the protect of the most powerful military force in the world?
When you don't have anything to say, just fall back on a president from 15 months ago.trump's genius screwing his own country
it's not like he had a rally yesterday or anything.When you don't have anything to say, just fall back on a president from 15 months ago.
An easy target.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?