Repeatedly demanding evidence that you plainly mean to declare not evidence is just about the dumbest internet tactic out there.
Like...
What's gonna happen if he plays? He collects all the same posts of yours that he based his prior assessment on, and you say for the second time that they are not evidence of Stalinism? And...what... this will cause
other people to think that RV has failed to support his claim? As if anyone could possibly think that someone loudly insisting they are not a Stalinist will say "ahhh, I see now, I AM one!" after being reminded of their words?
<><><>
At any rate, I'm not sure what else to call someone who defends a brutal war against innocent civilians because ~900 of them joined a volunteer paramilitary group accused of having neo-nazis beliefs.
The far-right neo-Nazi group has expanded to be part of Ukraine’s armed forces, a street militia and a political party.
www.aljazeera.com
Would you defend the world if it declared war on us and started murdering civilian? We have way more than 900 neo-nazis here. No, of course you would not, because whatever your real reason for defending Putin is, it is not the existence of Azov. It would be wildly insane to defend a murderous invasion of a country of 44,000,000 because it has 900 bad people somewhere in it, so I do not believe that is what you are really doing.
What are you really doing? What's it matter? You're defending evil. The specific label it's given is largely irrelevant.