When it comes to Washington there are only two mentalities, the spends and the spends more.
Central economic planning is a delicate balancing act. the Fed is using all the tools we have given it to bring us in for a soft landing, but Federal spending has been out of control for sometime and it really didn't tie itself to one party.
I'd say we are doing OK all things considered, as far as coming in for a soft landing, but that didn't have anything to do with who was in the Whitehouse or Congress, it has to do with who is in charge at the Fed and how it is able to remain true to the economics of the situation without too much undue political pressure.
I don't favor central economic planning, nor the Fed, nor the spends and the spend mores, but it is the system we have without regards to how I feel about it. We grew way too far way too fast, there was no naturally limiting factor as there would have been with a gold standard or a balanced budget amendment.
So now we are kind of stuck with debt based monies with 8 billion global people to feed, and as much as I would like for that situation to have never come to have been, it is what it is, our trap. We can't go back to sound money and sound spending and debt without a complete collapse of our economic and social systems.
Sadly that would bring about starvation for billions of people, so I'm not wishing that on the world.
When we consider that, a 0.6% drop in GDP is nothing, and all things considered it is good news.