Fetterman slams legal cases against Trump, Hunter Biden in first Truth Social post: ‘Cases were both bulls—‘

[ncguy]

One again with Dems, Libs, and Progs, any accusation is really a confession of what they themselves are guilty of.
This proven so often now, it should go without saying.

"proven"...where? how? lol

 

[X Factor]

There are liberals in this forum?

All I see are boiler plate authoritarian leftists.

There are but not very many.

 

[X Factor]

he was saying it about hunter's case.
not trumps cases.

He’s saying selective and political prosecutions happen in his DOJ.

 

[eohrnberger]

"proven"...where? how? lol

If you'd step out of the Dem's MSM propaganda media echo chamber, you'd have already found out. Alternatively, you could search these forums for 'confession', not that I think you'd do either, but there it is.

 

[ElChupacabra]

Actually, Fetterman is wrong. Both Donald Trump and Hunter Biden are completely unremorseful, entirely too arrogant, treating people horribly, and law breaking pieces of shit.

This. I would agree with him if they had been prosecuted and found guilty for things they didn't actually do. Now I've stated numerous times that the strongest argument to classify the NY Trump criminal case in this manner is that it was a novel legal theory. What doesn't change is Trump didn't pay out his hush money payment in a way that wouldn't be problematic.

 

[ncguy]

He’s saying selective and political prosecutions happen in his DOJ.

biden specifically referenced exactly one case. hunters.
that's specifically what he said.
nothing about trump's cases.

 

[ncguy]

If you'd step out of the Dem's MSM propaganda media echo chamber, you'd have already found out. Alternatively, you could search these forums for 'confession', not that I think you'd do either, but there it is.

so all you have is blather. lol

 

[braindrain]

the Post, as usual, skews things a bit, as Trumpers love to do.
Lawfare has gone on for centuries with important people, so big deal. HOWVER, the point with Trump is that he DID payoff a prostitute, etc, etc-----a presidential candidate = it should have disqualified him. Hunter is not even a government worker, so who cares???
Trump's other law breaking is incredibly significant. Case closed.

Strange how much you have flip flopped on this.

There is NO "lawfare" and you know it-----------just because DJT says it?? Really??

Doesn't need to be frivolous at all----but fear of being irresponsible is necessary with humans....

 

[eohrnberger]

Strange how much you have flip flopped on this.

Yeah, I know.
It went from 'Didn't happen', 'It's all on the up and up', to 'it's no big deal'.
That flop came right around Ol' Joe's pardon of Hunter, the previous position having been filed away in the left's collective memory black hole as if it never happened.

Well left, sorry, but it did, and you've all said 'Didn't happen', 'It's all on the up and up', and the Dem's MSM propagandists aren't going to be able to hide it for you, nor cover you on this either, having lost any and all credibility from their Dem propaganda spewing which everyone witnessed.

 

[Rexedgar]

Over/under when Fetterman changes party?

 

[PoS]

Fetterman is refering the NY state case against Trump, not the federal crimes we all watched him commit.

Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.

If that’s all you’ve got…?

Weisselberg plead guilty to all charges. Trump Org and Trump found guilty on all charges by two criminal court juries.
Manaforr and Stone found guilty by criminal court juries.., if patterns like the one you are attempting, matter.

BTW, post evidence of prosecutors and their families being targeted with threats of violence unless they prosecuted more severely, other than the threats against prosecutors and their investigators vs Hunter Biden.

Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.

you said biden was talking about the trump cases too.
you: "He's right, These cases were all lawfare"
ALL lawfare.. your quote.

so you lied..again. lol

I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.

the Post, as usual, skews things a bit, as Trumpers love to do.
Lawfare has gone on for centuries with important people, so big deal. HOWVER, the point with Trump is that he DID payoff a prostitute, etc, etc-----a presidential candidate = it should have disqualified him. Hunter is not even a government worker, so who cares???
Trump's other law breaking is incredibly significant. Case closed.

So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.

 

[dobieg]

Over/under when Fetterman changes party?

I'm from PA. Your good to go with Fetterman.

I will say my opinion of him as changed from thinking he was a turnip to that of a decent and honest liberal. A very rare combination.

 

[tshade]

So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.

It has been "lawfare" for centuries..........changing it into a new term that sounds bad is insignificant. It's like used cars vs. "pre-owned" = same thing.

It is very GOOD that we hold those in power to a very high standard, but with Trump it seems the opposite.

Fetterman is wrong-----we should expect much higher standards

 

[noonereal]

Fetterman slams legal cases against Trump, Hunter Biden in first Truth Social post: ‘Cases were both bulls—‘

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., made a serious social media splash on Tuesday, becoming the first Democratic U.S. senator to post on President-elect Donald Trump’s platform, “Truth Social.”…

nypost.com

He's right, These cases were all lawfare. Heck even Joe admitted that it was lawfare, but the libs in this forum kept saying otherwise.

Misleading headline from a right wing propaganda paper.

Of course we have a thread devoted to it.

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

Fetterman most certainly is entitled to his opinion, and it is a courageous one to make. Whether it's accurate or not … eh, it's a beauty is in the eye of the beholder type of thing. But no one will ever be as courageous as Jeannette Rankin, who held true to her pacifist roots and voted against the United States entering either World War:

Jeannette Rankin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What are you supposed to do when well armed countries are attacking you and killing your citizens and causing huge property damage?

I'm all about peace but not everyone else is.

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

Politics and partisanship aside, Fetterman seems like a pretty funny guy. We need more people like him in DC.

"Funny guy".....how?

Like....he amuses you? He's a clown?

How is Fetterman "funny"?

 

[ncguy]

Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.

Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.

I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.

So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.

biden was talking about one case, not trumps. he didn't say "lawfare" ,he didn't say anything about trump.
try having an IQ over 50. lol

 

[ncguy]

Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.

Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.

I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.

So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.

no, "either they are all lawfare or none are" is a stupid claim. lol.

one could be and the others may or may not be. Unless you can prove it..go for it.

try having in IQ over 50

 

[PoliSciPulse]

What are you supposed to do when well armed countries are attacking you and killing your citizens and causing huge property damage?

I'm all about peace but not everyone else is.

You can still be courageous but controversial. I certainly would have voted for the war myself. But the fact is, she stayed true to herself and remained consistent in spite of overwhelming peer pressure. I wish we had a ton more politicians like her in that way!

EDIT: So it's the trait I admire, not necessarily the vote(s) she cast. IF that makes sense.

 

[Deuce]

I agree that the trials against Trump were lawfare.

Trump is on audio recording showing highly classified documents to people.

 

[ElChupacabra]

Trump is on audio recording showing highly classified documents to people.

And trying to get a state SoS to find the votes he needs to win.

 

[Phys251]

The only reason Bragg went after Trump is because of lawfare. He wanted to lock him up or at least taint him because he didn't want him to run for president again. That is the definition of lawfare.

You cannot prove this at all.

 

[Phys251]

There are liberals in this forum?

All I see are boiler plate authoritarian leftists.

That's what righties would say.

 

[Gardener]

That's what righties would say.

I say it, too.

 

[Phys251]

I say it, too.

Who are these "boilerplate authoritarian leftists"? Name them.