FBI Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal [W:234, 1861]

[Paperview]

Re: clinton walks

Comey is a judge? I thought he was FBI Director.

Just get it all out of your system....go through the five stages of grief (you seem to be stuck on 2) ....and get yourself ready to say Madam President.

 

[apdst]

Re: clinton walks

Just get it all out of your system....go through the five stages of grief (you seem to be stuck on 2) ....and get yourself ready to say Madam President.

You better get some thick skin, because of she gets elected you all are going to have eat untold buckets of **** when her stupid ass shows us all just how stupid she really is.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

Comey isn't a judge, nor jury. He can't rule Clinton, "innocent". You asked what law she broke and I provided you with the law.

Here's what Comey said about the law you provided...

"..Following an exchange with Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) over the FBI's recommendation not to prosecute Clinton for lack of evidence of intent, Comey laid out his reasoning as to why the department has not used the Espionage Act of 1917's "gross negligence" statute to bring forth charges. The statute has been used only once by the Justice Department, he said, and in an espionage case.

"And whether their decision was smart or not, that is the record of fairness. And so you have to decide: Do I treat this person against that record and, if I do, is that a fair thing to do? Even if you're not worried about the constitutionality of it, my judgment is no reasonable prosecutor would do that," the FBI director told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, echoing his remarks from Tuesday.

"That would be celebrity hunting. That would be treating this person differently than John Doe."

FBI director: With Clinton, I tried to avoid 'celebrity hunting' - POLITICO​

In short, Comey said that only an unreasonable prosecutor who didn't care about fairness, precedent or the constitution would try to indict Hillary and take this case to trial. That wouldn't be a good career move, imo.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

No, the outrage was real, too. What's next? The GPP made her lie?

If it was real then how come not one single republican attended the memorial for the Benghazi victims?

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

Comey is a judge? I thought he was FBI Director.

The FBI is required to know the law and what constitutes a crime.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

You better get some thick skin, because of she gets elected you all are going to have eat untold buckets of **** when her stupid ass shows us all just how stupid she really is.

So what else is new?

 

[Paperview]

Re: clinton walks

You better get some thick skin, because of she gets elected you all are going to have eat untold buckets of **** when her stupid ass shows us all just how stupid she really is.

You voting for Trump?

:lamo

 

[apdst]

Re: clinton walks

You voting for Trump?

:lamo

I'm not going to be stupid and vote for Clinton.

 

[apdst]

Re: clinton walks

The FBI is required to know the law and what constitutes a crime.

But, it isn't a court, with a jury.

 

[apdst]

Re: clinton walks

If it was real then how come not one single republican attended the memorial for the Benghazi victims?

Why did Clinton lie about it?

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

But, it isn't a court, with a jury.

Without evidence of a crime there is no case and without a case there is nothing for a court or jury to decide.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

Why did Clinton lie about it?

What did she lie about? After four years of countless hearings and investigations, neither the Benghazi committees or Trey Gowdy's eleven hour marathon hearing could prove she lied.

The disappointment on his face says it all.....

 

[apdst]

Re: clinton walks

What did she lie about? After four years of countless hearings and investigations, neither the Benghazi committees or Trey Gowdy's eleven hour marathon hearing could prove she lied.

The disappointment on his face says it all.....

She lied about why the attack on Benghazi took place.

- about sending classified material on her server.

- about being shot at by snipers in Bosnia.

- about her grandparents being immigrants.

- about trying to enlist in the Marine Corps.

- about being broke and in debt when she left The White House.

- about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

She lied about why the attack on Benghazi took place.

Did she know she was lying...or did she rely on the intelligence available to her at the time?

- about sending classified material on her server.

Comey said that she didn't lie to the FBI and I assume he probably asked her the same questions that congress asked.

- about being shot at by snipers in Bosnia.

- about her grandparents being immigrants.

- about trying to enlist in the Marine Corps.

- about being broke and in debt when she left The White House.

- about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary.

lol that's quite a list. To be honest I've only heard about the "sniper" and "being broke" thing.

But a fact check did a comparison as to which candidate told the most lies... and if I recall it was something like...Hillary told lies 23% of the time...and Trump told lies 77% of the time.

So if you care so much about lying...then wouldn't you vote for the candidate that told the least amount of lies...instead of the one that told the most?

 

[Donc]

Re: clinton walks

She lied about why the attack on Benghazi took place.

- about sending classified material on her server.

- about being shot at by snipers in Bosnia.

- about her grandparents being immigrants.

- about trying to enlist in the Marine Corps.

- about being broke and in debt when she left The White House.

- about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary.

Yet the presumptive republican candidate for pres has put benghazi and Hillarys email in his rearview mirror.Imagine that.:2wave:

 

[Mycroft]

Re: clinton walks

Did she know she was lying...or did she rely on the intelligence available to her at the time?

Of course she knew it was a lie.

She told her daughter it was an al Qaeda attack, then she told the public it was because of the video, then she told Egypt is was an al Qaeda attack, then she told the public it was the video, then she told the family of the slain it was a video...and then, when she knew the jig was up, she said, "what difference does it make?"

Did the intelligence about the attack change from hour to hour? Or did her story change from hour to hour?

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

Of course she knew it was a lie.

Sorry but I don't think "mind reading" would hold up in court.

She told her daughter it was an al Qaeda attack, then she told the public it was because of the video, then she told Egypt is was an al Qaeda attack, then she told the public it was the video, then she told the family of the slain it was a video...and then, when she knew the jig was up, she said, "what difference does it make?"

She told her daughter in private what the intelligence was at that moment in time. When the main suspect that orchestrated the attack was interviewed by the NYT and after his arrest and extradition to the US....he confirmed it....the attack in Benghazi was inspired by an anti-Islamic video. So what she told the public and the family was correct.

Did the intelligence about the attack change from hour to hour? Or did her story change from hour to hour?

Yes, it did. The CIA tried to exclude itself from the State Department talking points because their mission in Benghazi was classified. It was their mission to make the area safe for diplomats to help the local government rebuild. But when the compound came under attack...and even though the CIA annex was only five minutes away....they failed to heed the call until it was too late. I think that might be where the rumor about "stand down orders" originated.

 

[Absentglare]

She lied about why the attack on Benghazi took place.

- about sending classified material on her server.

Both false.

- about being shot at by snipers in Bosnia.

True.

- about her grandparents being immigrants.

True.

- about trying to enlist in the Marine Corps.

Not enough information.

- about being broke and in debt when she left The White House.

Yes and no. Her statement was wrong (she said "dead broke" which is strange to say the least for someone with a $2m house), but she could have had more liabilities than assets at the time.

Either way, she could have believed it. Her statement was arguably false, but she could have simply been mistaken instead of lying.

- about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary.

True.

Not bad, actually. That's at least 50%.

Here's Trump:

- "We don't know anything about Hillary in terms of religion. Now, she's been in the public eye for years and years, and yet there's no — there's nothing out there."

- "Says Hillary Clinton "has even deleted this record of total support (for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement) from her book.""

- "For the amount of money Hillary Clinton would like to spend on refugees, we could rebuild every inner city in America."

- "The Obama administration was actively supporting Al Qaeda in Iraq, the terrorist group that became the Islamic State."

- "Crime is rising."

[url="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/pants-fire/]More here.[/url]

 

[Mycroft]

Re: clinton walks

Sorry but I don't think "mind reading" would hold up in court.


She told her daughter in private what the intelligence was at that moment in time. When the main suspect that orchestrated the attack was interviewed by the NYT and after his arrest and extradition to the US....he confirmed it....the attack in Benghazi was inspired by an anti-Islamic video. So what she told the public and the family was correct.

Yes, it did. The CIA tried to exclude itself from the State Department talking points because their mission in Benghazi was classified. It was their mission to make the area safe for diplomats to help the local government rebuild. But when the compound came under attack...and even though the CIA annex was only five minutes away....they failed to heed the call until it was too late. I think that might be where the rumor about "stand down orders" originated.

Oh...so you are going to believe the word of some terrorist???

My god...you'll scrape the bottom of the barrel to excuse Hillary, won't you?

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

Oh...so you are going to believe the word of some terrorist???

My god...you'll scrape the bottom of the barrel to excuse Hillary, won't you?

You're grasping at straws to blame her.

 

[Donc]

Re: clinton walks

You're grasping at straws to blame her.

With trump leading the parade, straws is all they have left.SAD.

 

[Moot]

Re: clinton walks

With trump leading the parade, straws is all they have left.SAD.

Very sad. It's like they're addicted to hating Hillary and will say and do almost anything to get their daily fix of hate.

 

[Mycroft]

Re: clinton walks

You're grasping at straws to blame her.

Not really grasping at straws...more like being willing to accept reality instead of trying to find ridiculous reasons to support your Hillary la-la-land.

 

[matchlight]

Re: clinton walks

Not really grasping at straws...more like being willing to accept reality instead of trying to find ridiculous reasons to support your Hillary la-la-land.

I fully expect un-American collectivists to support this woman, no matter what she does. Their character is no better than hers--lying and wishing this country ill come just as naturally to them as they do to her. As a result of four decades of public "education" which has been largely indoctrination against American culture, millions of these pseudo-liberal know-nothings are now taking up space in this country. The un-American Marxist liar now disgracing the White House and the un-American Marxist liar who is seeking to replace him are well suited to the times.

 

[justabubba]

Re: clinton walks

I fully expect un-American collectivists to support this woman, no matter what she does. Their character is no better than hers--lying and wishing this country ill come just as naturally to them as they do to her. As a result of four decades of public "education" which has been largely indoctrination against American culture, millions of these pseudo-liberal know-nothings are now taking up space in this country. The un-American Marxist liar now disgracing the White House and the un-American Marxist liar who is seeking to replace him are well suited to the times.

back at you

it may well be the bellicose, proudly ignorant, bigoted white members of the reich wing who are the citizens holding back America's future

must admit, posting such demagoguery was a release, tho still irrational. your turn