- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Messages
- 24,826
- Reaction score
- 8,345
- Location
- Northern New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision
FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision | Fox News
FBI Director James Comey took no questions after his bombshell announcement Tuesday that he would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her private email system, but he - and his boss - may soon answer to lawmakers.
Thinking this needs a new thread...
I suspect that Comey will say that he accepted the decision offered by career prosecutors. After all, no matter what evidence was uncovered, if prosecutors aren't willing to go forward, the evidence has basically been dismissed. It would seem more appropriate to question the career prosecutors who found the evidence presented inadequate to proceed. No, that doesn't mean Loretta Lynch. It means the career prosecutors themselves. They're the ones who made the decision, or so everyone in this administration maintains.
FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision
FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision | Fox News
FBI Director James Comey took no questions after his bombshell announcement Tuesday that he would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her private email system, but he - and his boss - may soon answer to lawmakers.
Thinking this needs a new thread...
Then they need to be question if they refuse then disbarred for obstruction of justice along with lynch.
They should all be arrested for felonies.
Lynch had already said numerous times that no matter what happened the doj would not prosecute.
She probably threatened all of her staff with their jobs if they did.
This needs a full congressional hearing and if anyone attempts to plead the 5th they are arrested on obstruction, collusion and corruption charges.
Has anyone heard about her staff? Are they cleared by association?
I suppose Comey can just do a "G men don't lie" thing, and tell the committee that Justice told him they were going to bury his report and the least he could do is make the facts public. Maybe Comey using the phrase "a reasonable prosecutor" is a homage to Clinton's "It depends on what the definition of 'reasonable' is", LOL
And there is nothing about the Clinton Foundation.
I suspect that Comey will say that he accepted the decision offered by career prosecutors. After all, no matter what evidence was uncovered, if prosecutors aren't willing to go forward, the evidence has basically been dismissed. It would seem more appropriate to question the career prosecutors who found the evidence presented inadequate to proceed. No, that doesn't mean Loretta Lynch. It means the career prosecutors themselves. They're the ones who made the decision, or so everyone in this administration maintains.
Fox News and the GOP lawmakers are wasting their time.They'll get nowhere with this BS.
Wait and see.
I will be interested to gain some clarity on the "intent" aspect of the FBI's decision. I'm no expert, but the claim there was no intent on the part of Hilary and her crew, and thus, no case, is a curious one.
I will be interested to gain some clarity on the "intent" aspect of the FBI's decision. I'm no expert, but the claim there was no intent on the part of Hilary and her crew, and thus, no case, is a curious one.
What's the BS? Comey may have raised more questions than he answered. You afraid of what the truth might be?
What's the BS? Comey may have raised more questions than he answered. You afraid of what the truth might be?
Is this you supporting infinite investigations?
Until we get to the bottom of it, yes. Its called, "checks and balances". Its Congress's job. Keeping politicians honest is probably the most important job Congress has.
Trey Gowdy better not be at the helm. If there's one person who could never find the truth while generating sympathy for the accused it's that clown. He's awful.FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision
FBI director could appear before lawmakers to explain Clinton decision | Fox News
FBI Director James Comey took no questions after his bombshell announcement Tuesday that he would not recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her private email system, but he - and his boss - may soon answer to lawmakers.
Thinking this needs a new thread...
I'm wondering if that wasn't Comey's objective.
Trey Gowdy better not be at the helm. If there's one person who could never find the truth while generating sympathy for the accused it's that clown. He's awful.
Hopefully, Ted Cruz will be asking the questions.
See, here's the problem.
They got to the bottom of it. What you really want is to skip the whole investigation thing and just convict the woman because you'd decided the "truth" long before the investigation even started.
See, here's the problem.
They got to the bottom of it. What you really want is to skip the whole investigation thing and just convict the woman because you'd decided the "truth" long before the investigation even started.
Didn't a significant number of career prosecutors ditch the DOJ after Eric Holder became AG (after the Philly New Black Panthers voter intimidation thing)?
Yes, it's possible. He may have said that he'll follow orders, but he won't lie before Congress. And maybe he tailored the announcement that way, because he lays out the case against her, then says no case at the end. He had to know that Congress would question him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?