I've used the word "stalk" once, in my last post. But I am free to use the word because I actually understand what it means in English. Regardless if I use "stalk" or "followed" Zimmerman was doing both, but neither of those descriptors are what the crux of the matter here is.
Now let me share something with you.
Stalk | Define Stalk at Dictionary.com
Stalk:
verb (used with object)
5. to pursue (game, a person, etc.) stealthily.
6. to proceed through (an area) in search of prey or quarry: to stalk the woods for game.
7. to proceed or spread through in a steady or sinister manner: Disease stalked the land.
Which brings me back to what I said to you before and you tried to step around it with your "stalk" point, which is ignorant owing to English. I've watched you make this same irrelevant argument about the legality of "following" people and being a NW for days now. The problem with your assertion is one of
so what? You think that *point* will really be a viable defense that Zimmerman's lawyers are going to bother using in court? That tangential road to nowhere is hardly the issue being discussed here and sure won't be when the gran jury convenes. The killing of Martin will be the issue, not redundant information about whether Zimmerman was free to follow/stalk Martin before he killed him.
