- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 31,089
- Reaction score
- 4,384
- Location
- The greatest city on Earth
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
...We also found out in that reply that it was Trayvon who was wearing the white t-shirt.
He was at one time.i thought he was wearing a hoody.
When did he take it off and on which tape was this mentioned?He was at one time.
Have you already forgotten what was discussed about a person wearing a white t-shirt?
That scenario, is not consistent with the known evidence.
The evidence is that he was the only one wearing a white t-shirt.When did he take it off and on which tape was this mentioned?
Then you are purposely ignoring Zimmerman's statement.Is there a witness statement that clearly indicates who 'Started' the fight?
I haven't seen one.
following him in his car and then on foot, in the middle of the night, was an act of intimidation.
Martin was justified in fearing for his safety.
Is there a witness statement that clearly indicates who 'Started' the fight?
I haven't seen one. Note that it is the start of the fight in this case (Since it was the only think that preceeded the shooting.) that is important. If Zimmerman started the fight then he murdered Martin, right?
Yes I am. Why shouldn't I?Then you are purposely ignoring Zimmerman's statement.
Then you are purposely ignoring Zimmerman's statement.
lolYes I am. Why shouldn't I?
lolI ignore the lies of cop-beaters, woman-beaters, and folks who dial 911 forty times a month.
His history certainly doesn't add to his credibility, but it doesn't warrant dismissing it entirely.I ignore the lies of cop-beaters, woman-beaters, and folks who dial 911 forty times a month.
lol
Prove it contains lies.
And the evidence says that is what he was trying to do. Keep him under observation until police arrived.
It was Trayvon who confronted Zimmerman.
As pointed out, Zimmerman thought Trayvon's actions were suspicious. That is a sufficient. Sufficient enough for the police to respond.
I most definitely are relying on the facts of this incident that we know of.
It is not unusual to tell the truth either, is it?
As far as I am concerned, Zimmerman didn't have enough time to make up a lie that would fit all the evidence as his statement does.
The police were on the scene immediately. He had no time to concoct an air tight dissertation of events under the stress he just went through.
I also don't think he would have been able to sustain a quickly made up lie in the face of hours long police questioning.
That scenario, him lying, just isn't plausible.
If it is required by law, do you think it didn't?
He wasn't playing vigilante. He was acting in his capacity as NW and was trying to keep the kid under observation until police arrived.
lolhe claimed "something is wrong with this guy" and "he's clearly on drugs", or something to that extent.
he was lying to the police, to make his future victim look like a bad guy.
...
This guy looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about.
...
Somethings wrong with him. Yup, he's coming to check me out, he's got something in his hands, I don't know what his deal is.
...
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html
I ignore the lies of cop-beaters, woman-beaters, and folks who dial 911 forty times a month.
Along with the audio recordings of six calls to Sanford police that George Zimmerman made in the weeks before the Feb. 26 shooting of Trayvon Martin, the Sanford Police Department has posted reports of 46 911 and nonemergency calls it says Zimmerman made between August 2004 and Martin’s shooting.
On which tape or statement was this verified?The evidence is that he was the only one wearing a white t-shirt.
It is part of the evidence. But, I have to consider the source, preceding events, who the other guy is, etc., and since his behavior could be considered as looking for a fight, it has to be discounted.lol
Because it is part of the evidence.
A better question would be: how many of those deaths were black teenagers?
Not many, if any, because we know that Sharpton and Farrakan would be screaming for retaliation and violence over those kids, too.
Al? Who can forget Al Sharpton...
Remember how he used that broad tawana brawley to torture anyone involved.
And after all was done, she was exposed as a dip **** fraud but no aplogies were forthcoming.
These people like Sharpton will crowd to their particular cause regardless of truth.
like many in this thread
al 'tawanna brawley' sharpton could give a rip about evidence, truth or justice
this is a racial thing, even tho it cannot be shown that the kid did not precipitate the violence
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?