- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 41,092
- Reaction score
- 18,378
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
So you honestly think that if the boy were white, events would have unfolded in this manner? If you say no, then it was racially motivated. If you say yes, please provide me with a logical argument.
Though he doesn't identify Martin as Black until asked, my impression was his motives were racially motivated. Here's Trayvon, by all accounts just walking innocently back to his father's home after buying candy and iced tea from 7-11 and Zimmerman's perspective of that was call 911 and report Trayvon was acting suspiciously and that he may be on drugs. Given it sounds to me like he said "f'ing coon", he seems like a racist to me who wouldn't have viewed a White kid walking home as "suspicious."I haven't read every report on the issue.
But he has a history of 911 calls, he's a neighborhood watch of one, he put his hands on a cop (VERY relevant, as it proves he'll put his hands on people, even though he pled out for expungement)
The "coon/punk" thing is inconclusive, he did not identify Martin as black until asked. So racial motivation isn't clear at this point.
As I said, wannabe cop. Actually wanted to be a cop but was rejected (id be interested to know WHY he was rejected).
It is just as likely that he would "get off" on collaring a white kid as a black one. Either would satisfy his cop fantasies.
The 911 tapes will be professionally examined and we'll know one way or the other whether he said coon or punk. Coon would be bad news, as it could provide grounds for racial motivation. (I'm not a big "hate crime" proponent, by the way, I feel its application is overbroad)
Jackass? Certainly.
Racist? Maybe.
Dammit joko, earlier in this thread you said arresting him would get him a lawyer and he'd get off because of it.
That it would be better to give him enough rope to hang himself.
I THOUGHT you were changing your arguments as the thread progressed.
Agreed
He should just go away as fast as possible while, he still can
As for the use of lethal force (I maintain it could have been avoided) I think Zimmerman has a fairly solid case for being "in fear of his life" based on the circumstances described. Some of the unprovided facts might be in favor of Zimmerman, some of them might *in the near future* be against him. But again given the circumstances as even though there is a possibility that Zimmerman may have overstepped, I believe any prosecuting attorney with just a little experience is going to realize the chances of a successful prosecution against Zimmerman for this unfortunate incident is slim
I think some confuse the moral with the legal. They aren't always the same.
Though he doesn't identify Martin as Black until asked, my impression was his motives were racially motivated. Here's Trayvon, by all accounts just walking innocently back to his father's home after buying candy and iced tea from 7-11 and Zimmerman's perspective of that was call 911 and report Trayvon was acting suspiciously and that he may be on drugs. Given it sounds to me like he said "f'ing coon", he seems like a racist to me who wouldn't have viewed a White kid walking home as "suspicious."
What evidence do you have that Martin was just innocently walking back straight home and wasn't asking suspiciously? Virtually everything posted against Zimmerman now is just made up stuff.
Nor in the end was he innocently walking home. He was assaulting Zimmerman after knocking him to the ground, according to the only eye witness to that - who is African-American.
ric27 said:As for the use of lethal force (I maintain it could have been avoided) I think Zimmerman has a fairly solid case for being "in fear of his life" based on the circumstances described.
I haven't read every report on the issue.
But he has a history of 911 calls, he's a neighborhood watch of one, he put his hands on a cop (VERY relevant, as it proves he'll put his hands on people, even though he pled out for expungement)
The "coon/punk" thing is inconclusive, he did not identify Martin as black until asked. So racial motivation isn't clear at this point.
As I said, wannabe cop. Actually wanted to be a cop but was rejected (id be interested to know WHY he was rejected).
It is just as likely that he would "get off" on collaring a white kid as a black one. Either would satisfy his cop fantasies.
The 911 tapes will be professionally examined and we'll know one way or the other whether he said coon or punk. Coon would be bad news, as it could provide grounds for racial motivation. (I'm not a big "hate crime" proponent, by the way, I feel its application is overbroad)
Jackass? Certainly.
Racist? Maybe.
Though he doesn't identify Martin as Black until asked, my impression was his motives were racially motivated. Here's Trayvon, by all accounts just walking innocently back to his father's home after buying candy and iced tea from 7-11 and Zimmerman's perspective of that was call 911 and report Trayvon was acting suspiciously and that he may be on drugs. Given it sounds to me like he said "f'ing coon", he seems like a racist to me who wouldn't have viewed a White kid walking home as "suspicious."
I don't know about that.On that, you are probably right. Zimmerman will not go to jail
You are in the wrong because you are characterizing this as stalking when keeping someone under observation until police arrive is not stalking.Your definition of suspicious really comes down to everyone outside not in a rush is suspicious. Hoodies are suspicious? Really? Walking in public is suspicious? Give me a break.
Stalking is also an aggressive act.
Zimmerman in all of his Neighborhood Watch Captain duties did not have a good arguement for why he decided to stalk this kid then kill him.
lol In reply to the above, as underlined:There is no difference in relative wind speed between a man walking 3 MPH with a wind speed of 0 MPH and a man standing still at 0 MPH with a wind speed of 3 MPH. In both cases the wind is moving past the man at 3 MPH. That is basic science that everyone should have learned in high school. :roll:
Without the local wind data there is no "evidence" at all except either the man or the wind or both were moving. And that's assuming you can shown where this "wind noise" is actually "wind" and not a product of Zimmerman breathing and the orientation of his mic.
If you want that information for more accuracy then yes it should be part of the investigation. It is not needed to determine if the statements are consistent with known evidence.
And so far as everybody can see, Zimmerman's statements are consistent with the known evidence.
Neighborhood Watch Shooting of Trayvon Martin: Probe Reveals 'Questionable Police Conduct' - ABC NewsSanford Police Chief Billy Lee said there is no evidence to dispute self-appointed neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman's assertion that he shot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin out of self-defense.
"Until we can establish probable cause to dispute that, we don't have the grounds to arrest him," Lee said.
NoZimmerman
Was
Wrong
From
The
Get.
If he had stayed in his ****ing car NONE of this **** would have happened.
Martin would have gone home and watched football.
Zimmerman would have gone home and watched EVERYBODY through binoculars during commercials on cop shows while the police scanner squawks and grumbles in the background.
A jackass killed a high school kid. Remove the jackass from the equation and there IS NO EQUATION.
Assuming that the motivation behind the incident is inconclusive, it is still a racial issue in that he has not been arrested for his "wannabe cop" shenanigans. If he were a black man, would he be in jail?
What evidence do you have that Martin was just innocently walking back straight home and wasn't asking suspiciously? Virtually everything posted against Zimmerman now is just made up stuff.
Nor in the end was he innocently walking home. He was assaulting Zimmerman after knocking him to the ground, according to the only eye witness to that - who is African-American.
What evidence do you have that Martin was just innocently walking back straight home and wasn't asking suspiciously?....
Based on the circumstances described, I'd say Zimmerman has no case for shooting Martin. Florida law is clear that an individual may resort to deadly force to counter deadly force. Getting punched in the nose by an unarmed teenager is not deadly force.
No
He
Wasn't
Wrong
From
The
Get.
I do not know the significance of posting this way is, but look, I can do it too.
Does that mean I am in the club?
Trying to keep someone in sight and under observation until police arrive is not wrong.
And if this high School kid just wouldn't have attacked him from behind he just may have remained alive to make it to the resident he was going to and have been able to finish watching the game, right?
The 'but for' game can be played all day.
I would say that in this instance the 'but for' should depend on if it was a criminal act or not.
Keeping someone under observation until police arrive is not a criminal act.
Attacking someone is.
Almost everyone posting here is concerned about the particulars of this case. They are missing the bigger issue, the Stand Your Ground law. The law could be applied again. As I've posted earlier, I bet someone get Zimmerman. Check out the area around Zimmerman’s house. Knock on his door at 2 AM, walk to the side walk and have Zimmerman follow them. Call 911, report being followed. Run a short a bit to get some distance and hang up. Now both can Stand Their Ground and it’s clear who would have the advantage. Maybe what Florida sees in this is allowing people to take care of their own problems without the cost of a larger police force, court system, etc.
Martin was followed by Zimmerman.
Zimmerman followed Martin in his car..and then on foot.
Martin stood his ground..and was killed for it.
You said the above in reply to joko104.It's not about deciding that he's guilty. It's about him facing an accounting for what he has done.
Having his day in court is what people think should happen.
It's the whole lack of charges being filed that is preventing Zimmerman from getting his day in court,.
People want Zimmerman to be tried.
When there is no act by the individual that raises to the level of criminality, then yeah.Calling for Zimmerman to face trial is a mob mentality?
Characterizing someone who leaves their truck to keep someone under observation as "pursue someone who is fleeing" doesn't change it to a criminal matter.imho, leaving the safety of your vehicle to pursue someone who is fleeing is different that defending oneself.
Your narrative is off and your talking about actual facts. lolZimmerman is not the Captain of any neighborhood watch, he is not even part of a neighborhood watch. He is a self appointed self proclaimed one man neighborhood watch. The police dispatcher he was on the phone with point blank told him not to follow Martin, instead he not only followed Martin but murdered him. All of these arguments being made here (those based upon actual facts and evidence) will get used when Zimmerman gets sued by Martin's family, as he inevitably will. I'd like to thank he will also be facing some criminal prosecution for his rash actions that resulted in the death of a innocent 17 year old.
I have to say I love how posters keep arguing what the facts in the case are, when the only thing anyone can argue here is what various press reports have said so far. The actual facts will come out in court.
That is not really true.And just a reminder, joko104 nor any other poster here has a clue what the "evidence" is, just a lot of speculation based upon differing press reports.
It is entirely possible that Martin chose that particular time and place to suddenly "go gangsta".
You narrative does not fit the known evidence and you are reading information into it that isn't there.When he got out of the car he was no longer just keeping a "watch" on this individual. He realized it was a single smaller person than him who he could intimidate with his size and having possesion of a gun.
The kid was alone on a street with no vehicle to find safety in. He has this civilian with a gun coming at him. So what if there was a fight. When you feel your life is threatened by a thug with a weapon you might do anything to survive.
As for the BS about this being all about anti gun rights is just that BS. I think the kid should have in retrospect had a gun to protect himself rightfully against a thug with a violent history.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?