Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
By Richard Moyer
21 August 2013
As many as 1300 people lay dead in Damascus today, many of them women and children, most definitely killed by nerve gas. The rebels are blaming Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's regime. Most people might take Syrian rebels' statements with a grain of salt, so the big question is who did it?
One way to find out is to see whose gas it was, but this is irrelevant.
Given that it is a war zone, and both the sitting Syrian government and the rebel groups have been found with nerve gasses, it doesn't matter whose nerve gas it originally was. It may very well have been manufactured Syria, but it could also be from the former Soviet Union, only to have been stolen and sold by the mob. The question of whose gas is totally irrelevant, being that rebel stores could have been captured by the government, or vice versa.
The best way to figure it out, though, is to check motives.
1.The rebels have nothing to lose in terms of international reputation. They are, in fact, some of the very least popular people in the world with such headliners as Al Qaeda in Iraq, Turkish Jihad and Abu Sakkar, the literally heart-eating Syrian rebel.
2.Obama has publicly declared the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime a 'red line' that would imply American intervention.
3.The rebellion isn't doing well.
4.Rebels are demanding international response to the gas attacks (presumably in their favor).
5.The US backs the rebels, and a US invasion would end Assad's regime within days.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
False Flag Nerve Gas Attack in Syria Kills 1300
Is Obama willing to go against International law and the UN to prove himself? Sadly the recipient of the Noble Peace Prize is proving he is a liar and warmonger.
How dare you overshadow Obomber's integrity with a logical argument. How long have you been a racist?
By Richard Moyer
21 August 2013
As many as 1300 people lay dead in Damascus today, many of them women and children, most definitely killed by nerve gas. The rebels are blaming Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's regime. Most people might take Syrian rebels' statements with a grain of salt, so the big question is who did it?
One way to find out is to see whose gas it was, but this is irrelevant.
Given that it is a war zone, and both the sitting Syrian government and the rebel groups have been found with nerve gasses, it doesn't matter whose nerve gas it originally was. It may very well have been manufactured Syria, but it could also be from the former Soviet Union, only to have been stolen and sold by the mob. The question of whose gas is totally irrelevant, being that rebel stores could have been captured by the government, or vice versa.
The best way to figure it out, though, is to check motives.
1.The rebels have nothing to lose in terms of international reputation. They are, in fact, some of the very least popular people in the world with such headliners as Al Qaeda in Iraq, Turkish Jihad and Abu Sakkar, the literally heart-eating Syrian rebel.[Excerpt]
2.Obama has publicly declared the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime a 'red line' that would imply American intervention.
3.The rebellion isn't doing well.
4.Rebels are demanding international response to the gas attacks (presumably in their favor).
5.The US backs the rebels, and a US invasion would end Assad's regime within days.
Read more:
False Flag Nerve Gas Attack in Syria Kills 1300
Is Obama willing to go against International law and the UN to prove himself? Sadly the recipient of the Noble Peace Prize is proving he is a liar and warmonger.
Yes, it's logical that terrorists...
Went against their best interest and forced UN involvement.
They seized a chem weapons depot without resistance.
They went into Assad controlled territory, prepared the rockets and launched from 10 various locations without resistance.
They conducted after action reviews in protective gear.
All of this with Assad officers.
That's logical. :roll:
Went against their best interests which they have done so in the past and forced UN involvement and to get any type of media coverage they can.
Yes they seized a chems weapons depot......but it was not without resistance.
They killed Regime forces and any prisoners they executed. Especially any Alawites.
Yes they went into Assad territory.....where they do have tunnels and safehouses where they stash their supplies.
Quite Logical and well within their actions. :mrgreen:
Perhaps we actually have evidence that it was Assad.
The longer Assad stands, the stronger the terrorist groups get. Removing him from power is not in their interest.
We have pics.
There was no fight at the depot.
The chems were secured from the depot, transported to Assad territory, prepared and launched without a fight. We have pics.
There's no reason and no way a terrorist element could have secured the depot, withdrew contents, prepared the rockets and launched them without a fight, there were ~10 launch sites, there's no way they pulled that off.
And we have audio and perhaps pics of Assad officers involved during the entire event. Are you telling me that the terrorists managed all that and with the help of Assad henchmen?
Impossible.
The longer Assad stands the more Rebel Terrorists get killed.
By Richard Moyer
21 August 2013
As many as 1300 people lay dead in Damascus today, many of them women and children, most definitely killed by nerve gas. The rebels are blaming Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's regime. Most people might take Syrian rebels' statements with a grain of salt, so the big question is who did it?
One way to find out is to see whose gas it was, but this is irrelevant.
Given that it is a war zone, and both the sitting Syrian government and the rebel groups have been found with nerve gasses, it doesn't matter whose nerve gas it originally was. It may very well have been manufactured Syria, but it could also be from the former Soviet Union, only to have been stolen and sold by the mob. The question of whose gas is totally irrelevant, being that rebel stores could have been captured by the government, or vice versa.
The best way to figure it out, though, is to check motives.
1.The rebels have nothing to lose in terms of international reputation. They are, in fact, some of the very least popular people in the world with such headliners as Al Qaeda in Iraq, Turkish Jihad and Abu Sakkar, the literally heart-eating Syrian rebel.
2.Obama has publicly declared the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime a 'red line' that would imply American intervention.
3.The rebellion isn't doing well.
4.Rebels are demanding international response to the gas attacks (presumably in their favor).
5.The US backs the rebels, and a US invasion would end Assad's regime within days.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
False Flag Nerve Gas Attack in Syria Kills 1300
Is Obama willing to go against International law and the UN to prove himself?Sadly the recipient of the Noble Peace Prize is proving he is a liar and warmonger.
The longer Assad stands, the stronger the terrorist groups get. Removing him from power is not in their interest.
We have pics.
There was no fight at the depot.
The chems were secured from the depot, transported to Assad territory, prepared and launched without a fight. We have pics.
There's no reason and no way a terrorist element could have secured the depot, withdrew contents, prepared the rockets and launched them without a fight, there were ~10 launch sites, there's no way they pulled that off.
And we have audio and perhaps pics of Assad officers involved during the entire event. Are you telling me that the terrorists managed all that and with the help of Assad henchmen?
Reality check:
As long as Assad remains in defiance, the civil war continues until the only groups left that can provide security are terrorists. Assad falling is a very bad thing for terrorists. With the UN to compete against for security, the terrorists will be marginalized. They will also be excluded from government and, presuming the SNC has signed Rome, will be prosecuted by the ICC.
It's not gonna become AlQyia when Assad falls. Hez will lose training grounds and secure areas for preparation. Puppets of the Iranian regime will be left to compete with the UN for protection.
The best situation for the terrorists is a dictator slaughtering his own people.
So, when is the UN coming in militarily or to provide security?
Those are claims. Neither the audio nor the pictures have actually been presented.
Reality check:
As long as Assad remains in defiance, the civil war continues until the only groups left that can provide security are terrorists. Assad falling is a very bad thing for terrorists. With the UN to compete against for security, the terrorists will be marginalized. They will also be excluded from government and, presuming the SNC has signed Rome, will be prosecuted by the ICC.
It's not gonna become AlQyia when Assad falls. Hez will lose training grounds and secure areas for preparation. Puppets of the Iranian regime will be left to compete with the UN for protection.
The best situation for the terrorists is a dictator slaughtering his own people.
The best situation for the innocent and civilians of the world.....are standing up to terrorists and taking them down at all times. So that they cannot spread.
After Assad falls, with the transitional govt.
Well, not to you. Let's see what the senate (especially the intel) thinks about it.
If Libya is any hint, I don't think that this transitional government will go well.
In fact, even gaining access to just the classified summary involves a series of unreasonably high hurdles.
We have to descend into the bowels of the Capitol Visitors Center, to a room four levels underground. Per the instructions of the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, note-taking is not allowed.
Once we leave, we are not permitted to discuss the classified summary with the public, the media, our constituents or even other members. Nor are we allowed to do anything to verify the validity of the information that has been provided.
And this is just the classified summary. It is my understanding that the House Intelligence Committee made a formal request for the underlying intelligence reports several days ago. I haven’t heard an answer yet. And frankly, I don’t expect one.
Assad is a terrorist. His continued war serves other terrorist groups.
Course you already knew about this in another thread.
12 U.S. Intelligence Officials Tell Obama It Wasn’t Assad | Washington's Blog
That's a blog signed by 12 former intel and military officials. It's an intentionally misleading title and a pathetic source.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?