• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

ex-skeptic helps prove God's authorship

:doh

I'm with Thinker on this one. Just because he was once a Skeptic doesn't make it proof. It means that something convinced him. The burden of proof is now on him. That article didn't really prove anything.
 
I agree with the posters above. This "proves" nothing. A once capitalist suddenly becomes socialist. Does this prove that socialism works? I'm sure you'll have an opinion about that Fonz. Aeeehhhhhhhhh.

:lol:
 
I had to bring in a quote from the aforementioned skeptic's refutation of Bible Codes:

Thomas also did an ELS analysis on Drosnin's Bible Code II: The Countdown (2002) and found the message "The Bible Code is a silly, dumb, fake, false, evil, nasty, dismal fraud and snake-oil hoax."
 
If God loves us, then why does he add such important text in clues? and not just come-out and say "blah blah and blah"?



I don't believe in the secret codes.. sorry ladies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom