ex-skeptic helps prove God's authorship

[Arthur Fonzarelli]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44348

 

[Thinker]

Strange use of the word "proof".

Try here for a little sanity: http://www.skepdic.com/bibcode.html

 

[StillPhil]

:doh

I'm with Thinker on this one. Just because he was once a Skeptic doesn't make it proof. It means that something convinced him. The burden of proof is now on him. That article didn't really prove anything.

 

[V.I. Lenin]

I agree with the posters above. This "proves" nothing. A once capitalist suddenly becomes socialist. Does this prove that socialism works? I'm sure you'll have an opinion about that Fonz. Aeeehhhhhhhhh.

:lol:

 

[Dezaad]

I had to bring in a quote from the aforementioned skeptic's refutation of Bible Codes:

Thomas also did an ELS analysis on Drosnin's Bible Code II: The Countdown (2002) and found the message "The Bible Code is a silly, dumb, fake, false, evil, nasty, dismal fraud and snake-oil hoax."

 

[Arch Enemy]

If God loves us, then why does he add such important text in clues? and not just come-out and say "blah blah and blah"?



I don't believe in the secret codes.. sorry ladies.