Added a Florida Republican, who like all participants was granted anonymity in order to speak freely, “Trump is grinding the GOP to a stub. He couldn't find enough xenophobic, angry white Floridians to beat Hillary in Florida if he tried.”
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
1. Politico was ranked as being one of the most liberal sources for news in the American media, by the Washington Post. They ranked just shy of Al Jazeera in a poll of news sites preferred by people who identify as "liberal".
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
Err... did you even read what you wrote? A poll of news sites preferred by people.. that does not show bias for **** sake.. All it shows is habit, and nothing about bias. I prefer to each day to check Drudge Report.. does that make me a far right wack job? Of course not, but that is my habit for years. I also check Americanblog, does that make me a gay left winger? Of course not.
I doubt most republicans are going ooh I ****en hate Trump so I'll vote Clinton.Just like Sanders supporters who can't stand Clinton they might vote 3rd party, leave that part of the ballot blank or just stay home. But they won't vote for the opposing party's pick just because they can't stand their party's pick.
I think Trump got the party's nominee because of rat ****ing by the other party.He did well in states that allow open primaries and in closed primary states democrats switched parties and voted for Trump.I think open primaries need to be banned and you can't switch parties from when candidates first announce they are running all the way until the primaries are over.That would eliminate a lot of that rat ****ing.
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
Jail before bail !! :lamo
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
naaa yet time will tell.
I doubt most republicans are going ooh I ****en hate Trump so I'll vote Clinton.Just like Sanders supporters who can't stand Clinton they might vote 3rd party, leave that part of the ballot blank or just stay home. But they won't vote for the opposing party's pick just because they can't stand their party's pick.
I think Trump got the party's nominee because of rat ****ing by the other party.He did well in states that allow open primaries and in closed primary states democrats switched parties and voted for Trump.I think open primaries need to be banned and you can't switch parties from when candidates first announce they are running all the way until the primaries are over.That would eliminate a lot of that rat ****ing.
I am just making certain I understand you . are you saying you think Dems voted for Trump in open primaries so the republicans would have a poor nominee?
The US is now 43% independent. If closed primaries were banned, people could actually vote for candidates they like rather than be shafted with the candidates the parties pick for them.
And yes, I see your problem, but honestly I envy it. I wish the democratic party still believed in democracy. It's devolved into nothing more than a quasi-social-left and mostly-economic-right elite playground that puts megadonor interests before constituents more than the republican party ever seems to have. The republican party having the ethics to accept Trump because he was the voters' choice despite him clearly not being a strong candidate, or even probably a wise candidate, shows that the republican party still believes in the right of the people to self-determination. With the democrats it's just a big **** you to anyone who isn't on board. Because of this election, I'm much more likely to be a registered republican in the future than a registered democrat.
She's not the voters' choice. She's the democrats' choice. If Democrats weren't so afraid of her proving not to be the voters' choice, they wouldn't have sabotaged Bernie's chances every chance they got, including going so far as to scrap all voter registration drives during the primary, despite voter registration generally being the democrats' only chance to win elections. While this is going on, the majority of the democratic party did nothing to question **** like when the few debates that were actually scheduled were on weekends and holidays, or when DWS and NGP-VAN deliberately cut access to the voter database on a false narrative, or when Bill Clinton showed up at Massachusetts polling places, or ****, even the fact that Hillary Clinton is under criminal investigation which no one outside the democratic bubble is under any delusion that she's innocent. Maybe my favorite is when Arizona proved election fraud in Hillary's favor and democrats still said nothing. Maybe instead it's when the Nevada convention was deliberately thrown to the dogs, enforced with state police, and then later covered up with another false narrative supported by Barbara Boxer, which the media later had to retract. Oh, I know, maybe it's this latest one where the Clinton campaign colluded with AP to announce her the primary winner right before the California primary. Then again worse was probably when DWS rolled back restrictions on donations from federal lobbyists--what's wrong with that, if it helps Hillary? What does it matter if Hillary runs the most organized collection of big money and super-PAC fed campaign, as long as she pays lip service to the evils of money in politics? Or I forget, has she stopped saying that yet? Throughout all of this, the number of Clinton supporters I know to have said ANYTHING, questioned ANY of it equals exactly one. The democrats have their choice. That much is obvious. Some of them fought long, hard, and dirty for it, and the rest were all see no evil because that's apparently what the party is all about.I'm genuinely curious. She's clearly the voters' choice
Yeah, they can agree with her quieter policies while at the same time having a public punching bag, instead of disagreeing and even fearing his policies while not being able to fight back. Hillary is the best outcome for congressional republicans.The Republican Party will provide Trump lukewarm support during the election because they don't want to alienate Trump supporters. But I would bet money that most of them want Hillary to beat Trump. Not because they like Hillary, but because 4 years of Hillary will benefit the Republican party much more than 4 years of Trump.
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
Insiders: Clinton would crush Trump in November - POLITICO
This piece was written in April and more are onboard. i am curious how many republicans are supporting her over Trump.
She is a centrist.
She's not the voters' choice. She's the democrats' choice.
Absolute fiction. Bernie polls better among independents, and Clinton did better in all the closed primaries. Or do you honestly think she could have won New York or Pennsylvania if they were open primaries?Yes, she is the voters' choice. She got more votes. Many of those voters were indeed Democrats. That's to be expected, given that they were competing in a Democratic primary. But even if you only look at votes cast in open contests, she still beat him 57-43.
See, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Anytime someone mentions any one of the litany of problems in the democratic party, Clinton loyalists always chalk it up to conspiracy theory and dismiss the entire thing. It's not like it's limited to individuals, either. The FBI has her under a criminal investigation? Must be a republican conspiracy! It's like rote dismissal of actual, real problems is suddenly part of the party platform. This article described that tendency perfectly:This sore loserism and conspiracy theory spinning is getting sad at this point.
Second of all, there is a real allergic reaction to truth in the Clinton camp. If Hillary had joined with Bernie and called for investigations into the many, many, many reported cases of election fraud, the political environment on the left would be drastically different. But rather than deal with the facts, the Hillary camp chose to ignore the rights of voters and describe the calls for fairness as the ravings of lunatics searching for a conspiracy.
Yeah jumping on board once they got caught is really ****ing convenient after the fact. Anything else about the other debacles you want to add?(You might also want to check your facts. E.g, the DNC is suing the state of Arizona over its electoral practices, a lawsuit both the Clinton and Sanders campaign have joined.)
No, that's unreasonable for what I'm claiming. The Clinton campaign was on board once one of its supporters got caught, and they hardly could have done so before, either way. To clarify, I'm not claiming that there's some vast conspiracy controlling everything. The DNC and DWS has done quite a bit to rig the election, the Clinton campaign itself has conducted hella sketchy ****, and local officials everywhere are conducting their own little change-the-vote operations, but I don't claim that everyone is working together. What I'm accusing the democratic party of is the wholesale abandonment of its principles.Yeah jumping on board once they got caught is really ****ing convenient after the fact. Anything else about the other debacles you want to add?(You might also want to check your facts. E.g, the DNC is suing the state of Arizona over its electoral practices, a lawsuit both the Clinton and Sanders campaign have joined.)
Absolute fiction. Bernie polls better among independents, and Clinton did better in all the closed primaries. Or do you honestly think she could have won New York or Pennsylvania if they were open primaries?
So now that you got that out of the way and shown you're in ****ing lockstep in calling Bernie supporters crazy for complaining about election fraud, if you have nothing better then don't waste your effort.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?