• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Euthanasia, should people have the right to decide their own end?

What is you opinion of Euthanasia

  • In favor, if it is my time, I hope it is possible for me

    Votes: 21 70.0%
  • in favor, but I doubt I would choose to die in that manner

    Votes: 4 13.3%
  • I don't want it, but other should be free to make that choice

    Votes: 3 10.0%
  • against, because ..............

    Votes: 2 6.7%
  • I am not sure/I don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    30

Because I think it devalues human life to be able to throw it away. One cannot stop another from killing themselves if they are so motivated, but nobody should be forced to help them do it.
 
Really don't care. There are no guarantees in life except you will eventually die.

You can avoid a painful horrible death with the administration of a drug cocktail by a medical professional who knows what he or she is doing.
 
Because I think it devalues human life to be able to throw it away. One cannot stop another from killing themselves if they are so motivated, but nobody should be forced to help them do it.

There are some doctors (Dr. Kevorkian for example) who would willingly put people out of their misery. Watching someone suffer like that is horrible.
 
Then I think you immoral, heartless and at best misguided.

All questions of morality pertain to human suffering, you who would require it.

I could care less about what you think of my morality. I do not require suffering you arrogant wind bag--nature does.
 
There are some doctors (Dr. Kevorkian for example) who would willingly put people out of their misery. Watching someone suffer like that is horrible.

You can avoid a painful horrible death with the administration of a drug cocktail by a medical professional who knows what he or she is doing.

Still don't care. That Dr. Kevorkian also killed people who were not even terminally ill should be a clue to you as to what kind of door you are opening.
 
Why do you presume anybody would be "forced" to help you? Doctors in OR can write the scrip and give you instructions - they don't have to - they just can. It's no different than medical marijuana permits. No MD is "forced" to write them, they do it for either money or a genuine belief that it helps the patient.

Is this our misunderstanding? Do you presume that if suicide were legalized that someone or some agency would be forced to write the scrip? That's all it is - it is self-administered. I'd prefer a professional administer it in a cozy environment (think Soylent Green's Public Suicide chambers where you pick the video, the music and your friends (if any).)






Because I think it devalues human life to be able to throw it away. One cannot stop another from killing themselves if they are so motivated, but nobody should be forced to help them do it.
 
Rick Santorum has made very deceitful comments about Dutch Euthanasia, the comments can be heard in the first part of this video:


very funny is also the response by the Santorum campaign when questioned about this by a Dutch reporter:


And please believe me, nothing of what he said was true. There are no "do not kill me bracelets", euthanasia is not 10% of deaths, involuntary euthanasia does not exist and our elderly do not go to foreign hospitals in droves because they are afraid of being killed.
 
**** you you heartless piece of ****

I could care less about what you think of my morality. I do not require suffering you arrogant wind bag--nature does.

You clearly do. Also, you would need to have a morality for me to think anything of it.

As if I cared what the likes of you cared about. Its a good thing you have no power to stop people from ending their suffering.
 
Still don't care. That Dr. Kevorkian also killed people who were not even terminally ill should be a clue to you as to what kind of door you are opening.

Does one need to be terminally ill to decide it's time to exit what might remain of their life?
 
Then they cannot expect my support. There is no situation in which I would support euthanasia. None. Not a single one. People think it is humane. I think it devalues human life. Life is a bitch and so is death usually. That is just how it is.

And you are free to feel that way, I think letting someone die in unbearable pain and suffering is much more inhumane than euthanasia is. And again, if someone does not want to be die by euthanasia that is fine, more than fine with me. I just would like people who do not think like you to have the freedom to choose euthanasia if and when the time comes for them to make that decision.
 
Santorum is as crazy as a loon. Even the GOP couldn't deal with him during his failed Presidential run.


 
Still don't care. That Dr. Kevorkian also killed people who were not even terminally ill should be a clue to you as to what kind of door you are opening.

There does not have to be a slippery slope.
 
If a person wants to die bad enough, sure. As long as it's on their own. The liabilities and potential for abuse are far too risky to allow third-party actors.
 
If someone is willing to commit themselves to non existence, then they deserve the right to.
 
In the Netherlands no doctor can be forced to actively be involved in any way shape or form with euthanasia of their patient. However they do not have the right to deny that patient from changing to a doctor that does not have a moral issue with the process of euthanasia.
 
Not only in favor, but we should encourage it. Tax breaks for the survivors, or something.
 
I am for it with certain qualifications. I think that it should definitely be done with medical supervision or at least trained supervision and I think that it should not be allowed for absolutely everyone. Terminal patients, yes. People in a lot of pain where there really is no alleviation of that pain, yes. Just someone who is depressed, I don't agree with allowing them to kill themselves rather than getting them help.
 
as long as the individual is a terminally ill adult, i don't have a problem with it. i would add that i support extreme oversight when it comes to depression related issues in young people, though. youth is an extremely tempestuous for some of us, and euthanasia at 25 for potentially treatable psychiatric illnesses is a mistake, IMO.
 
Not only am I in favor of people's right to choose euthanasia, but I don't think they should have to justify it.

We don't get to decide what qualifies as "a life worth living" for other people. Just because someone doesn't have terminal cancer doesn't mean their life is necessarily worth living to them. And at the end of the day, their opinion is the only one that matters.

You can say what you like about the fact that people can kill themselves now if they really want to, but consider the impact this has. If the person fails, they may wind up extremely debilitated, or locked away against their will. If they succeed, they may traumatize loved ones and police officers who encounter a gruesome scene (since the most effective methods are often the most gruesome). They further traumatize loved ones by having to act in secret; the shock is often as bad as the loss itself.

Legalizing euthanasia gets rid of all of these problems. But it requires people to let go of the idea that their own fear of loss is a good enough reason to force someone else to live against their will.
 

I can agree with the caveat that a person suffering from depression must first undergo a period of counseling and evaluation to determine if it is a true desire or merely a passing phase caused by the depressed mood.
 
A few years ago my grandmother had a massive stroke. It left her unable to move or talk, yet she was still aware of what was going on. The family knew her wishes, that she wouldn't want to live like that. They ceased use of feeding tubes and IVs. But since she was able to breath on her own they just had to wait until she died from dehydration/starvation. Sure, they kept her doped up so the process wouldn't be as miserable but had the option been available to simply give her an injection, ending her life in seconds, they would have jumped on it. Who wouldn't.

Alzheimers and other forms of dementia runs on my mom's side of the family. Hopefully I take after my dad's side and just drop dead of a heart attack in my 70s but if I get diagnosed and start showing the signs of something like Alzheimers, I will check out while I still have the sense to do so. It would be nice if a doctor could assist.
 
In favor, and I hope to maintain enough self-awareness until
I know I should carry it out, with no help from anyone else if necessary.
 
I support euthanasia, but I'm not sure I would ever do it. Never say never, though, as you cannot predict the future.

As to the part in red, I'd support her, I'd visit her prior, and give her a big hug and reassure her, but I don't think I could be there when it's done.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…