• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elon Musk says Trump to be "reinstated" to Twitter

"Our generosity." That's a good one.

The only reason the USA has any generosity at all is because of the Democratic Party.

If it was up to Republicans the USA would have no generosity; zero; none. And no compassion for the needy/oppressed.
Sweden found out the hard way, didn't they?
 
WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.

But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
Imagine that, a MAGA who has zero concept of democracy.

lol
 
Trump is the epitome of win/lose philosophy. He always wants to be the winner,
As opposed to almost every other politician?
of course, but that doesn't happen. When he loses it totally messes up his head. He can't admit he lost!
Why the focus on what he "admits?" He lost. He left on January 21, 2021. That's the reality. He doesn't have to "admit."
Doesn't want to face the truth. He goes into 'alternative facts' zone. That's where he crosses the line from reality into fantasy.
Alternative facts are what politics is based on. The idea that Democrats peddle truth, and Trump peddles alternative facts, is laughable in the extreme.

All of them lie.
Problem is: He takes a lot of conned 'marks' with him.

That's the biggest problem for USA politics right now.

We can't distance ourselves far enough away from Trump. The people who got burned are the last ones to admit it.
You're just putting us back in the hands of the biggest liars of the past 60 years. We have been owned by a machine for the last 60+ years, and they don't care about you or me at all, and they are lying pieces of shit and war criminals. Think of every war we've been involved in for the last 62 years -- almost every one was fomented and based on lies. The one notable exception MIGHT be Afghanistan in 2001 -- and ONLY for the first year, max. After that, it was a big load of bullshit.

Every other war we've been involved in for the past 62 years, starting with the falsified Gulf of Tonkin incident which caused 60,000 American soldiers' deaths and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese deaths, in a decade's long war crime, and running through various coups, trumped up national security risks, faked casus belli, etc. The people that want to "get back to" honor and trust in politics aren't thinking clearly. As bad as Trump was, he's a piker compared to the war criminals of the last 60 years.
 
"Our generosity." That's a good one.

The only reason the USA has any generosity at all is because of the Democratic Party.
LOL - it's cute you think the Democratic Party is "generous."
If it was up to Republicans the USA would have no generosity; zero; none. And no compassion for the needy/oppressed.
The US doesn'thave generosity, and neither does any other country. The US uses foreign aid as a tool of politics and global strategy. It's not a charity. And, the Democrats don't act any differently, because both parties are owned by the same people.
 
I have hardly ever seen a more over-exaggerated narrative than the one about Trump's supposedly "harmful" tweets. Another completely manufactured outrage.


If Vice President @Mike_Pence comes through for us, we will win the Presidency. Many States want to decertify the mistake they made in certifying incorrect & even fraudulent numbers in a process NOT approved by their State Legislatures (which it must be). Mike can send it back!
States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!
Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!

wonder what prompted the J6 traitors to repeatedly chant "hang mike pence"
mrniceguy can't see it
he insists he is unable to see the "harm" in tRump's tweets

a visit to the optician may be needed by him if he cannot see the harm in tRump's tweets
 
It had been argued that Trump being banned from twitter is a stand against free speech. Others argued that twitter can set their own set of rules. So which is it then?
Let Musk do what he wishes. It is up to consumers and sponsors whether he falls on his face or succeeds.
do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?




space karen spent $44Billion to be able to change those rules at twitter
 
Your obsession with Trump is quite worrisome from a psychological POV. Especially since you have no dog in the fight. Shouldn't you be more concerned with the mockeries going on in the UK? Talk about a WOKE country. LOL
Your defensive posturing is noted, and I will continue to comment on Trump whether it meets with your approval or not. Don't like it? Tough; count how many shits I don't give.
 
WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.

But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
tell us more about COVID and how it's nothing.
 

wonder what prompted the J6 traitors to repeatedly chant "hang mike pence"
mrniceguy can't see it
he insists he is unable to see the "harm" in tRump's tweets
Right - it's far more dangerous to censor statements like that than to allow them. He didn't call for the hanging of anybody, or for any harm to come to anyone. He stated his opinion about the election. If you are going to enforce that rule against everyone, we no longer have a first amendment. The fact that you can't see that is alarming.
a visit to the optician may be needed by him if he cannot see the harm in tRump's tweets
The fact that you would define his tweets as "harmful" suggests you have no idea how free speech works.
 
do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?




space karen spent $44Billion to be able to change those rules at twitter
DP has its rules, so does twitter. Not mine to chance.
 
Imagine that, a MAGA who has zero concept of democracy.

lol
Imagine that. Yet another poster that can't tell anyone wtf "Destroying Democracy" means. Whoioda thunk?
 
Imagine that. Yet another poster that can't tell anyone wtf "Destroying Democracy" means. Whoioda thunk?
Attacking Congress in a violent attempt to overthrow the results of an election. Continually threatening election workers, continually pushing false "stolen election" narratives.
 
Right - it's far more dangerous to censor statements like that than to allow them. He didn't call for the hanging of anybody, or for any harm to come to anyone. He stated his opinion about the election. If you are going to enforce that rule against everyone, we no longer have a first amendment. The fact that you can't see that is alarming.

The fact that you would define his tweets as "harmful" suggests you have no idea how free speech works.
[emphasis added by bubba]

it would appear you are of the opinion it should be found acceptable to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre
 
WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.

But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
I'm going to make it really simple for you: My idea of democracy is respecting our over 250-year-old institutions which includes accepting the results of elections and promoting the orderly transfer of power. Our party, as it stands fights against our institutions, not for any philosophical reason, but for the purpose of clutching to power.

And I honestly don't care how you choose to label me.
 
do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?
That depends on if what it finds appropriate depends on political perspective, and not objective standards. Being opposed to pornography, vulgarity is one thing. Censoring political opinion on a discussion board called "Debate Politics" would be rather counterintuitive and contrary to free speech. If people are going to debate politics, then all sides of a political discussion should be permitted. We should also be permitted to debate things like fascism, Nazism, communism, socialism, Marxism, anarchism, and anything else, and that would include the "pro" side to those debates. The forum would be within its rights to censor whatever it wants, of course, but it would not be rational to call it supportive of free speech if it said "we can debate fascism here, but you can't hold a pro-fascist position...."
space karen spent $44Billion to be able to change those rules at twitter
So what? Maybe he'll make it all back.
 
Attacking Congress in a violent attempt to overthrow the results of an election. Continually threatening election workers, continually pushing false "stolen election" narratives.
Trump wasn't there. So, you're going to use a spontaneous trespassing that happened two years ago forever? Can we use the months of riots by the left then to say all Democrats are rioters?

How many people threatened election workers? Where was this? Any arrests?

So, if someone has an opinion that a guy who stayed in his basement didn't really win, that is a false narrative? Especially with all the irregularities and no signature of address confirmations and mail boxes placed in Democrat areas that went unmonitored?
 
Back
Top Bottom