- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 93,973
- Reaction score
- 69,055
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Quite ironic.Link?
Quite ironic.Link?
Sweden found out the hard way, didn't they?"Our generosity." That's a good one.
The only reason the USA has any generosity at all is because of the Democratic Party.
If it was up to Republicans the USA would have no generosity; zero; none. And no compassion for the needy/oppressed.
Imagine that, a MAGA who has zero concept of democracy.WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.
But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
As opposed to almost every other politician?Trump is the epitome of win/lose philosophy. He always wants to be the winner,
Why the focus on what he "admits?" He lost. He left on January 21, 2021. That's the reality. He doesn't have to "admit."of course, but that doesn't happen. When he loses it totally messes up his head. He can't admit he lost!
Alternative facts are what politics is based on. The idea that Democrats peddle truth, and Trump peddles alternative facts, is laughable in the extreme.Doesn't want to face the truth. He goes into 'alternative facts' zone. That's where he crosses the line from reality into fantasy.
You're just putting us back in the hands of the biggest liars of the past 60 years. We have been owned by a machine for the last 60+ years, and they don't care about you or me at all, and they are lying pieces of shit and war criminals. Think of every war we've been involved in for the last 62 years -- almost every one was fomented and based on lies. The one notable exception MIGHT be Afghanistan in 2001 -- and ONLY for the first year, max. After that, it was a big load of bullshit.Problem is: He takes a lot of conned 'marks' with him.
That's the biggest problem for USA politics right now.
We can't distance ourselves far enough away from Trump. The people who got burned are the last ones to admit it.
LOL - it's cute you think the Democratic Party is "generous.""Our generosity." That's a good one.
The only reason the USA has any generosity at all is because of the Democratic Party.
The US doesn'thave generosity, and neither does any other country. The US uses foreign aid as a tool of politics and global strategy. It's not a charity. And, the Democrats don't act any differently, because both parties are owned by the same people.If it was up to Republicans the USA would have no generosity; zero; none. And no compassion for the needy/oppressed.
I have hardly ever seen a more over-exaggerated narrative than the one about Trump's supposedly "harmful" tweets. Another completely manufactured outrage.
If Vice President @Mike_Pence comes through for us, we will win the Presidency. Many States want to decertify the mistake they made in certifying incorrect & even fraudulent numbers in a process NOT approved by their State Legislatures (which it must be). Mike can send it back!
States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!
Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!
Who cares? Al Capone got done for tax fraud, not the many murders he was responsible for. Trump is toast.Where are the CONVICTIONS?
do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?It had been argued that Trump being banned from twitter is a stand against free speech. Others argued that twitter can set their own set of rules. So which is it then?
Let Musk do what he wishes. It is up to consumers and sponsors whether he falls on his face or succeeds.
Your defensive posturing is noted, and I will continue to comment on Trump whether it meets with your approval or not. Don't like it? Tough; count how many shits I don't give.Your obsession with Trump is quite worrisome from a psychological POV. Especially since you have no dog in the fight. Shouldn't you be more concerned with the mockeries going on in the UK? Talk about a WOKE country. LOL
tell us more about COVID and how it's nothing.WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.
But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
Right - it's far more dangerous to censor statements like that than to allow them. He didn't call for the hanging of anybody, or for any harm to come to anyone. He stated his opinion about the election. If you are going to enforce that rule against everyone, we no longer have a first amendment. The fact that you can't see that is alarming.Tweets of January 6, 2021 | The American Presidency Project
www.presidency.ucsb.edu
wonder what prompted the J6 traitors to repeatedly chant "hang mike pence"
mrniceguy can't see it
he insists he is unable to see the "harm" in tRump's tweets
The fact that you would define his tweets as "harmful" suggests you have no idea how free speech works.a visit to the optician may be needed by him if he cannot see the harm in tRump's tweets
DP has its rules, so does twitter. Not mine to chance.do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?
space karen spent $44Billion to be able to change those rules at twitter
It's something. It's just not what the alarmists say it is.tell us more about COVID and how it's nothing.
Sure, and now Twitter has new rules.DP has its rules, so does twitter. Not mine to chance.
which is why you and your family didn't get vaccinated.It's something. It's just not what the alarmists say it is.
Imagine that. Yet another poster that can't tell anyone wtf "Destroying Democracy" means. Whoioda thunk?Imagine that, a MAGA who has zero concept of democracy.
lol
So, ummm, did you lie about there being convictions?Who cares? Al Capone got done for tax fraud, not the many murders he was responsible for. Trump is toast.
Attacking Congress in a violent attempt to overthrow the results of an election. Continually threatening election workers, continually pushing false "stolen election" narratives.Imagine that. Yet another poster that can't tell anyone wtf "Destroying Democracy" means. Whoioda thunk?
[emphasis added by bubba]Right - it's far more dangerous to censor statements like that than to allow them. He didn't call for the hanging of anybody, or for any harm to come to anyone. He stated his opinion about the election. If you are going to enforce that rule against everyone, we no longer have a first amendment. The fact that you can't see that is alarming.
The fact that you would define his tweets as "harmful" suggests you have no idea how free speech works.
I'm going to make it really simple for you: My idea of democracy is respecting our over 250-year-old institutions which includes accepting the results of elections and promoting the orderly transfer of power. Our party, as it stands fights against our institutions, not for any philosophical reason, but for the purpose of clutching to power.WTF is "Democracy" other than a vague catch-all term used BY THE DEMOCRATS? I think you are a fake Republican posting here to make Republicans look bad because they aren't more like Chucky Schumer.
But just for kicks. Explain to me what you mean by this "Democracy" term. Scratch that. it is meaningless blather is what it is. It's like saying someone is "fascist" because he is against illegal a=immigration and then not explaining why that is. Or, it's like calling someone racist if they don't care for the opinions of Joy Reid, Don Lemon, and Al Sharpton. IOW, "Favoring Democracy" is a BS term that is meaningless and lets you and others who use that term off the hook because you use it like a slur to denigrate anyone who happens to disagree with your liberalism.
That depends on if what it finds appropriate depends on political perspective, and not objective standards. Being opposed to pornography, vulgarity is one thing. Censoring political opinion on a discussion board called "Debate Politics" would be rather counterintuitive and contrary to free speech. If people are going to debate politics, then all sides of a political discussion should be permitted. We should also be permitted to debate things like fascism, Nazism, communism, socialism, Marxism, anarchism, and anything else, and that would include the "pro" side to those debates. The forum would be within its rights to censor whatever it wants, of course, but it would not be rational to call it supportive of free speech if it said "we can debate fascism here, but you can't hold a pro-fascist position...."do you think debate politics is opposed to free speech when it silences posts from those forum members it finds inappropriate?
So what? Maybe he'll make it all back.space karen spent $44Billion to be able to change those rules at twitter
Trump wasn't there. So, you're going to use a spontaneous trespassing that happened two years ago forever? Can we use the months of riots by the left then to say all Democrats are rioters?Attacking Congress in a violent attempt to overthrow the results of an election. Continually threatening election workers, continually pushing false "stolen election" narratives.
Generosity is not a mistake. It is the mark of good people.Sweden found out the hard way, didn't they?