• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ELON HAS ALREADY FREED MTG, LAUREN, MADISON AND MATT. Check out their first tweets below...

Desert Storm said:
You wanna make a bet that they will??
Click to expand...
Depends. If you think Musk will make Twitter more valuable you might want to hang on to your stock to sell at a higher price later. If you think Musk will want to pay dividnds on the shares you might want to hang on to your stock.
 
CaughtInThe said:
you guys ever heard of that champion of free speech named Sean Hannity? here's what happens when I login to the Sean Hannity message board...


View attachment 67387576



here's ole Sean Hannity...

Image





:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Sean Hannity is Pure Imbecile:

People should not be able to spew misleading spin for the sake of drama attack on the Policies, Principles, Measures and Legislative Programs that Benefit American Society and it's Citizens.

Free Speech should not a matter of one spewing vitriol for drama antics for public popularity and drama driven pay based on selling advertisement by the use to maliciously "inciting people with contempt based narratives" , simply because they don't like programs and policies that help the general working public and is not a greater benefit to the wealthy and corporate entities. While saying anything to increase "advertising revenue for his/her media program".

Hannity, will say "anything" to create "drama incitements", because drama incitements attract viewers, so he can sell more advertising based on the number of viewers he can attract.

There is a matter of RESPONSIBILITY, and there should be RESPECT for the Nation that has made it possible for him to be one who has means to earn a wealthy lifestyle. Yet, he can only think about his wealthy, by leading the people with drama while disrespecting the system and not having a sense of responsibility to know how to respect the legislation that is structured to benefit Nation and People.

These kind of people take the word, Freedom and ignore that it means, responsibility and respectfulness.. Instead, he is like the barbarian, who thinks it means, say anything, do anything, any way, by any means with regard for nothing but self gratification for the sake to spin drama incitement to enrich himself, at the expense of create contempt within our system and society.
 
Last edited:
Grand Mal said:
Depends. If you think Musk will make Twitter more valuable you might want to hang on to your stock to sell at a higher price later. If you think Musk will want to pay dividnds on the shares you might want to hang on to your stock.
Click to expand...
It should be concern about "more than money" when a messaging platform has the potential to be damaging to the "Integrity" of American Government and our Representative Democracy.
Without Government, and Representative Democracy... none of what exist, would exist in the ways to serve the best interest to society.

People get wealthy and think they have the power to ignore anything an everything, all for the sake of "Money". America's money is only backed by the "Integrity" the society and the world has in respecting American Government.
 
Spunkylama said:
Yes we have no border. I mean why even bother with a wall am I right PTG? Oh and it's not like the government can track people with phones...
Click to expand...
would you like for me to post all of MTG's tweets over the last year?
 
Outlook said:
How dare Musk tear down democracy by allowing free speech!!!
There is only one voice allowed, the party of the democrats.
Click to expand...
dude. do you REALLY not know that Republicans tweet every second of every day? i mean, do you REALLY believe that they don't?
 
RealityNow said:
It should be concern about "more than money" when a messaging platform has the potential to be damaging to the "Integrity" of American Government and our Representative Democracy.
Without Government, and Representative Democracy... none of what exist, would exist in the ways to serve the best interest to society.

People get wealthy and think they have the power to ignore anything an everything, all for the sake of "Money". America's money is only backed by the "Integrity" the society and the world has in respecting American Government.
Click to expand...
Do you say the platform needs to be closely monitored to protect the government and democracy or it should be unmonitored to protect the government and democracy?
More closely monitored might mean it goes unused and unmonitored might mean it becomes '4chan', a place for juveniles to trade porn and insults.
 
Grand Mal said:
Depends. If you think Musk will make Twitter more valuable you might want to hang on to your stock to sell at a higher price later. If you think Musk will want to pay dividnds on the shares you might want to hang on to your stock.
Click to expand...
I think Musk will make Twitter more profitable because they havent gained much since they became an IPO.
He'll do it through better advertising probably
 
Spunkylama said:
lol touche. Just thought you might know why people make several twitter accounts.
Click to expand...

One of them is her personal account. One is her official "I am a Congresswoman even though I am an idiot" account. The second one is the one that she's been using to urinate all over herself since the personal one was banned.

She broke the rules and they bounced her.

She remains an idiot of epic proportion.
 
Candyman said:
I honestly don't get either side of this in a way. Cons are gloating as if Musk owning Twitter is suddenly going to make cons the most powerful voices in America. Libs are freaking out as if Musk owning Twitter is somehow the end of Democracy. Jesus, people. It's a ****ing website. Its a big version of MySpace. If Twitter disappeared tomorrow everyone would just find another place to go. It's kinda disheartening that one website has created this much fuss. This is what we've become. I weep more for humanity than democracy.
Click to expand...
I'm not seeing that. I'm sure you can link to someone who is, but....meh.
 
Desert Storm said:
I think Musk will make Twitter more profitable because they havent gained much since they became an IPO.
He'll do it through better advertising probably
Click to expand...
Sounds like you know a lot about this.
 
reflechissez said:
I'm not seeing that. I'm sure you can link to someone who is, but....meh.
Click to expand...
There are some. I think Elizabeth Warren was spouting yesterday. And there was a tweet in another thread about some guy I don't know blathering about how we now need new laws regulating online platforms because they're all billionaire owned or something. I just don't get it. This is neither a huge game changing victory nor the end of the world. But Drama Queens gotta drama queen I guess.
 
Candyman said:
There are some. I think Elizabeth Warren was spouting yesterday. And there was a tweet in another thread about some guy I don't know blathering about how we now need new laws regulating online platforms because they're all billionaire owned or something. I just don't get it. This is neither a huge game changing victory nor the end of the world. But Drama Queens gotta drama queen I guess.
Click to expand...
You mentioned TWO PEOPLE. I'm sure there are more. But I think your blanket accusation of "libs freaking out" is way over stated. Right wingers on the other hand...
 
reflechissez said:
You mentioned TWO PEOPLE. I'm sure there are more. But I think your blanket accusation of "libs freaking out" is way over stated. Right wingers on the other hand...
Click to expand...
Well I'll agree with you there. Perhaps a bit hyperbolic. But yeah, this is hardly a game winning touchdown for Cons.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Proof that Twitter was blocking people because of politics!

Oh my...........

Screaming fits starting very soon!
Click to expand...
Every one of those people have been posting on Twitter without much stop for months at least, including about Musk buying Twitter. They were not banned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom