SO WHAT IF HE IS ????
Americans has freedom of religion, Yes or No ????
Watch his action not his words !!!!
BY THE WAY..... I don' believe a word of this statement, He said, She said, They said, We Said....
Next please.... What else is new ????
Of course it is. But it's not possible to say:Is possible (sic) to bash Obama without being called a racist?
One word for you, my German friend: Holocaust
Moderator's Warning: |
Moderator's Warning: |
The red in our quote could be changed from "is" to "was". They're changing, from the top down.
Also, if Turks are so tolerant, why do the Polizei dare not to go into the Turkish Ghetto's in Berlin?
Why is there Sharia law being carried out in these ghettos, ...
...girls murdered by their families because they became westernized?
Why do they not assimilate if they are so open? After so many years... and it isn't getting better.
Is it?
I'll say it's not all Turks... I have met some nice folks, and they make one hell of a good Doener.
Scharf bitte.
Would you agree that in most of these Islamic states, there is little or no separation of government and religion?
If so, does it become the responsibilty of their governments to "reign in" these extremist groups? If so, how can we separate the two?
The OP reeks of propaganda and lies. First of all, Obama's father was an ex Muslim that became an atheist. If Obama is a Muslim then he is a terrible on at that. What Muslim goes to a church that professes Christianity? What Muslim says he's a Christian and doesn't attend mosque services?
So we have a blog reporting that Obama told the Egyptian Foreign minister(whose name he misspelled) that Obama is a Muslim. A quick search shows that the only reports on this are from the blog. No confirmation whatsoever except a very biased blog. So either we believe people on faith for no reason in a story that makes no sense, or we look at the evidence and say that it is highly improbable.
It is very unlikely Obama is Muslim. It's very unlikely that Obama told the Egyptian Minster he is Muslim. Even if those two unlikely things where true, it has no effect on anything. It's almost embarrassing that some people in the wold are this gullible. Looking at the comments on the blog site make me fear for the future of humanity, that there really are that many stupid people.
You people are missing the POINT. We dont WANT a Muslim as president!
Why? What are you and everyone else who's opposed to this President so afraid of? If he is a true Muslim then he will advocate a message of peace.
It means that they've been lieing about it, all along. He lied, because he knew there was no way in hell he would get elected, if he admitted he was a Muslim.
It means another lie to the voters. He ran as a Christian
And if it proves to be true, who will be shocked? Anyone? Anyone? Any takers? :wow:
I can't believe some are so delusional they would buy an absurd conspiracy theory like Obama is Muslim with a hidden agenda and has deliberately been pretending to be Christian to fulfil it. Seriously, folks. Both that Bush himself is responsible for 9/11 and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are more credible. The paranoia required to buy that points to mental illness.
Oh, so close to avoiding disclosing the fact that you're a pseudo truther.
Believing Bush could somehow have been directly responsible for 9/11 falls under what you referred to as "mental illness."
You better readjust you're foil hat, don't want to miss any signals from the mother ship...
Okay, so he perhaps was disengenuous about his religious preference. I can understand why some who believe personal integrity is important at all levels where a person's charactor is concerned. But I can also understand how ANYONE running for public office in a post-9/11 world in the U.S. wouldn't stand a chance of being elected even to dog catcher if the public knew his or her religious preference was Muslim. The way I see it, if we as a nation of laws who claim to value our freedoms are true to said freedoms under the law, it really shouldn't matter what a person's religious preference may be. We should be more concerned with what that person does while holding office, not so much what his religious preference might be. To date, I see no evidence to support the notion of fear and mistrust that many have placed on this President.
No laws have been written that take away your freedoms.
No laws have been written that subvert the government's ability to do it's job at all levels - legistlative, executive or judicial.
Until such becomes evident, I'm fine with letting the man who the majority of American elected to the highest office in the land do his job.
Why? What are you and everyone else who's opposed to this President so afraid of? If he is a true Muslim then he will advocate a message of peace.
In the wake of 9/11 I can't say I blame him. But again I say that since it is Muslim extremist who are causing this country so much trouble abroad, wouldn't it make more sense to have someone who knows their core believe system and understand where said beliefs are being distorted and can use their religious teachings to turn things around?
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
(Okay...poor analogy, but the point is I'd rather have someone in office who knows these religious wackos inside and out and can reason with them and probably get them to stand down than someone who only acts to antagonize them and make matters worse.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?