- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Duke is in an uproar about a highly detailed "**** list" that a recent female graduate made — in PowerPoint, complete with penis-size evaluations and dirty talk transcripts.
This chick is a lunatic.
College Girl's PowerPoint "**** List" Goes Viral (may have to type in the web address)
Ex.
This chick is a lunatic.
Curious - let's say that one of the guys who was rated low in this report jumped off a bridge tomorrow. How would people react to that?
I'd say he made a dumb choice, why?Curious - let's say that one of the guys who was rated low in this report jumped off a bridge tomorrow. How would people react to that?
I'd say he made a dumb choice, why?
this young, willing, talented duke graduate will soon have an excellent position at some major company
Frat boy keep lists and journals like this all the time, ranking their conquests and comparing notes.
I don't think she looks "mannish" at all. She's definitely more attractive than the one on the right. She's incredibly smart, too, which is a plus. I'd toss one her way.
Neither one is a prize, but what indicates that she's smart? The fact that she spent a few hundred hours putting together a powerpoint of the athletes she boned?
edit: And then sent it out via email where it could easily become public?
You can tell just by the writing that she's pretty intelligent.
Book smart =/= street smart.
Can you really not see the difference between deliberate harassment and something getting out that was intended to be private?http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...himself-after-gay-sex-footage-put-online.html
The differences betwen my hypothetical and that actual situation are minimal. In that case, many people are clamoring for the perpetrators to spend decades in jail. I'm just wondering if that same mentality would apply here.
She sounds like she has a solid grasp on the english language. While that's not particularly common, it's not exactly book deal material.
Can you really not see the difference between deliberate harassment and something getting out that was intended to be private?
True, but I doubt that girl on the right could have managed to put something like this together.
I would argue that the girl had no reasonable expectation that what she sent around would be sent around and made public whereas the guys who sent the pictures around did so with the express purpose of embarrassing the victim and with the reasonable expectation that LOTS of others would figure it outThe guy in Jersey tried to share a video of his roommate kissing a guy with a few friends. This chick successfully shared an evaluation of the sexual prowess and penis size of 13 guys with her friends, who then shared it with millions of people on the internet.
You can argue that the intent was different, but the initial result seems pretty similar. The only difference is that nobody on this list has killed themselves yet, thankfully.
I would argue that the girl had no reasonable expectation that what she sent around would be sent around and made public whereas the guys who sent the pictures around did so with the express purpose of embarrassing the victim and with the reasonable expectation that LOTS of others would figure it out
The girl distributed the information to three friends with the expectation that it would stay between those three friends. The guys shared the pictures with the express purpose of humiliating the subject of the photos. I dont get how you can NOT see a clear-cut difference.The girl intended to distribute this document to a group of her friends. The guy intended to share the webcam with a group of his friends. They both fully intended to disclose this information to a particular group of people. In both cases, their sharing of the information ended up having effects beyond what they expected.
The girl distributed the information to three friends with the expectation that it would stay between those three friends. The guys shared the pictures with the express purpose of humiliating the subject of the photos. I dont get how you can NOT see a clear-cut difference.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?