• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dr. Fauci On GOP Criticism: ‘Attacks On Me, Quite Frankly, Are Attacks On Science’

Which Emails? I keep hearing you guys talk about the troublesome emails, yet none of you actually post them.
There have been a number of big email dumps based on FOIA requests of Fauchi's emails. They've been problematic for him, to say the least, and led to criticism from all sides. This has been in many news stories.
 
Scared enough to get the vaccine (in private as to not upset the deplorables).

If I were a Trump supporter, given everything Trump has said about Covid-19, that would really piss me off.

You'd think that would piss them off.

But it doesn't.

That's how we know it's a cult.
 
And yet…you told me to go out and prove that your false claim was true.
lol. Nope. You are obviously not interested in discussing anything, but in sniping. have the last word.
 
There have been a number of big email dumps based on FOIA requests of Fauchi's emails. They've been problematic for him, to say the least, and led to criticism from all sides. This has been in many news stories.
Yes, I see post like yours and "new" articles that keep saying that, yet no-one is posting said problematic emails here or anywhere else. The few emails I've actually seen are benign at best.
 
And if it’s proven that he knew what the wuhun lab was doing, he’s toast. Btw, he was against masks before they became a way to control the public.

Honestly, that entire post sounds crazy.

1. Whether COVID originated in a lab or in Chinese market is irrelevant to the public health response. If HIV originated in a lab, does that mean that public health authorities should not advocate for condom use?

2. The science on mask usage evolved quickly early in the pandemic and public health recommendations reflected that.
 
lol. Nope. You are obviously not interested in discussing anything, but in sniping. have the last word.
Yes you did. You made a false claim, and when challenged on it you told me to go out and research it. That’s telling me to prove your false claim to be true.
 
Yes, I see post like yours and "new" articles that keep saying that, yet no-one is posting said problematic emails here or anywhere else. The few emails I've actually seen are benign at best.
Sigh. Then I would recommend you look at some of the stories regarding the emails. Yes, most are benign, but even there is contradictions between what he was saying to different people. This is a topic that should be discussed more on this forum, but's being avoided.
 
Sigh. Then I would recommend you look at some of the stories regarding the emails. Yes, most are benign, but even there is contradictions between what he was saying to different people. This is a topic that should be discussed more on this forum, but's being avoided.
You made the claim now back it up. Why are you avoiding backing your own claim. Should be easy
 
You made the claim now back it up. Why are you avoiding backing your own claim. Should be easy
What claim are you referring to? If you aren't aware of the email dumps, do some google searches. There's a lot of stories on it. It's not even the topic of this thread.

I see that you are trying the same childish deflection as cardinal. It's not useful.
 
What claim are you referring to? If you aren't aware of the email dumps, do some google searches. There's a lot of stories on it. It's not even the topic of this thread.

I see that you are trying the same childish deflection as cardinal. It's not useful.
Your entire debate strategy is "Prove my false claims true for me." The arrogance in thinking that could ever work is pretty amazing.
 
and came out, after taking advice from medical professionals, preaching about how it wasn't that bad. after they saved his life.

he's really a dirt bag that caused the unneeded deaths of tens if not hundreds of thousands Americans (many from his own base). that mafia.
Yeah and it didn't dawn on any of them
 
What claim are you referring to? If you aren't aware of the email dumps, do some google searches. There's a lot of stories on it. It's not even the topic of this thread.

I see that you are trying the same childish deflection as cardinal. It's not useful.
His recent email releases have created a real problem for him, and certainly don't support that it was 'all about science'.
So which email are you referring to? You must have one or more in mind for you to write this correct?
All I've seen is that his opinion changed over time when new information came out.
His initial stance on masks makes a lot of sense in the context of what was going on with limited supplies. For trumpets to hold that as masks don't work is just ****ing stupid.
 
Righties' opinions of Fauci is ignorant AND arrogant. but hey, Fox told them to have a hate on for Fauci, so that is all they needed :rolleyes:

He disagreed with their replacement Jesus, and so they have to obsess about him.
 
Its almost as if science evolved quickly on a virus that nobody had seen before!

Science shouldnt make inaccurate claims, if the science hasnt yet evolved enough to make such claims. AND we now know he said there was no reason to wear masks in March, so people wouldnt buy up all the masks needed by the medical workers, NOT because there was no reason.
 
He disagreed with their replacement Jesus, and so they have to obsess about him.

His emails didnt include much in the way of disagreement with Trump and did include much about disagreement between his public pronouncements and his emails.
 
Fauchi had Trump’s number from word go.

He was always polite, but firm, and unambiguous.

Trump couldn’t push him around, like he did to poor Deborah Brie, and order around like Scott Atlas.

When the President, who is supposed to be the voice of authority, plays the buffoon, offers quack cures, airs his grievances, an announces that he won’t take any responsibility, someone has to be the voice of reason and science.

That’s what people were looking for. That’s what Trump has never done.
 
Science shouldnt make inaccurate claims, if the science hasnt yet evolved enough to make such claims. AND we now know he said there was no reason to wear masks in March, so people wouldnt buy up all the masks needed by the medical workers, NOT because there was no reason.
That kind of thinking would still have us using 1700s technology.
 
????No, 2020 mask technology.
If scientists can't move forward without being 100% sure of something, then they are likely not going to move forward and that means technology based on that science will also not move forward.
 
Back
Top Bottom