• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does this liberal represent you?

Barbbtx

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
8,467
Reaction score
1,993
Location
W'Ford TX
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
I thought I'd heard it all, but I hadn't. Liberals never cease to amaze me.:roll:
Just curious. Are there any liberals here who think Heidi Hartman represents them?


 
No.

To be fair, it's also not crazy to say that providing services such as childcare or healthcare isn't a job-creator, even if it might be viewed as wasteful.

I also wasn't entirely clear as to what she was trying to say. Was she really saying that people should be using welfare money to sit at home and watch TV? Or was she saying that no matter whether one is employed or unemployed, he or she should have access to healthcare?
 
Last edited:
Somewhat...

I think you should have universal access to healthcare and childcare. I think you should have childcare if you are at work around the clock...
 
Somewhat...

I think you should have universal access to healthcare and childcare. I think you should have childcare if you are at work around the clock...

The lady is a socialist nut job. She thinks we should have Universal Childcare provided for everyone, and she doesn't care if you're just sitting home eating bon bons.
Childcare provided for everyone? What next? A right to a job? A right to free education?
 
I thought I'd heard it all, but I hadn't. Liberals never cease to amaze me.:roll:
Just curious. Are there any liberals here who think Heidi Hartman represents them?




Not me. I feel the point of welfare is remediation of the individual, sitting home and eating bonbons does not do that. Now childcare for someone trying to better themselves (like go to college), wouldn't be a bad idea.
 
If all you do is sit at home eating bon bons, then childcare is a better option for the child.
 
If all you do is sit at home eating bon bons, then childcare is a better option for the child.

:lol: I didn't think about it, but you're probably right.
 
The lady is a socialist nut job. She thinks we should have Universal Childcare provided for everyone, and she doesn't care if you're just sitting home eating bon bons.
Childcare provided for everyone? What next? A right to a job? A right to free education?

why don't you explain for us why those things are bad
 
Yeah, I'm not so clear on what's bad about a free education for all and a right to a job for everyone.
 
I thought I'd heard it all, but I hadn't. Liberals never cease to amaze me.:roll:
Just curious. Are there any liberals here who think Heidi Hartman represents them?

No, but it's not a crazy idea.
 
It's not up to the government to provide us all a mansion and a flying pony.

i missed the post where that was advocated.
please point it out
 
It's not up to the government to provide us all a mansion and a flying pony.

I agree, but there is great benefit to providing childcare for poor working families to enable them to get off welfare, and for providing free education so we can compete in the future with the other first world nations that are providing free education. However, there is one major drawback to making this possible, it would require long-term thinking, something the US has not oftern been good at. The short-term thinkers see it as a waste, as just more social programs that can be cut to provide further tax cuts for the rich folks. :sun
 
There's a lot more socialists on here than I thought.
If DP is any indication of the number in the country, we've got our work cut out for us.
Free Childcare, Free Education (college education?) a guaranteed job? Free healthcare?
I'm with X Factor, what next a mansion and a flying pony?
This is America, not Greece (yet)
 
There's a lot more socialists on here than I thought.
If DP is any indication of the number in the country, we've got our work cut out for us.
Free Childcare, Free Education (college education?) a guaranteed job? Free healthcare?
I'm with X Factor, what next a mansion and a flying pony?
This is America, not Greece (yet)

Nothing is free. We pay taxes.
 
There's a lot more socialists on here than I thought.

So you have determined that most of the free world are socialists, is that your position?

'The following list of countries are the majority of those that are called “free-market countries” or “industrialized countries”. The OECD (explained below) is an excellent source of statistical information about the 31 countries. OECD is based on countries with a market-oriented ideology. Twenty-seven are high-income countries. Among the 31 countries that are referenced at this website, most of them have some form of “health care for all”, as per the many implementations of health-care-for-all systems. Everybody In. Nobody Out. It is time for the U.S. to stop bureaucracy, start efficiency, and catch up to the rest of the world when it comes to being efficient in paying for health care.

Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea (South)
Luxembourg
(Mexico)
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
(Poland)
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
(Turkey)
United Kingdom


FYI: in some years additional countries are added to the OECD organization. For example, three were added during the year 2010: Chile, Estonia, and Slovenia."
Medicare for All: List of Industrialized Countries



Free Childcare, Free Education (college education?) a guaranteed job? Free healthcare?
I'm with X Factor, what next a mansion and a flying pony?
This is America, not Greece (yet)

A working parent sounds better to me than a family on welfare. This is not a socialist view, it is a long-term view of what is best for our country's future.

India joins list of 135 countries in making education a right
 
So you have determined that most of the free world are socialists, is that your position?

'The following list of countries are the majority of those that are called “free-market countries” or “industrialized countries”. The OECD (explained below) is an excellent source of statistical information about the 31 countries. OECD is based on countries with a market-oriented ideology. Twenty-seven are high-income countries. Among the 31 countries that are referenced at this website, most of them have some form of “health care for all”, as per the many implementations of health-care-for-all systems. Everybody In. Nobody Out. It is time for the U.S. to stop bureaucracy, start efficiency, and catch up to the rest of the world when it comes to being efficient in paying for health care.

Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea (South)
Luxembourg
(Mexico)
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
(Poland)
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
(Turkey)
United Kingdom


FYI: in some years additional countries are added to the OECD organization. For example, three were added during the year 2010: Chile, Estonia, and Slovenia."
Medicare for All: List of Industrialized Countries





A working parent sounds better to me than a family on welfare. This is not a socialist view, it is a long-term view of what is best for our country's future.

India joins list of 135 countries in making education a right

I would hardly calls those countries having "efficient" healthcare.

The whole point against socialism and communism is because it is inefficient. Ever look at the pros and cons of Capitalism and Communism?.... it's the same for socialism and whenever the government funds something instead of the market.
 
Nothing is free. We pay taxes.

Not everyone. and if you take too much from people who do, they'll either stop making as much (why bother) or find ways to avoid taxes.
Then we'll have riots like Greece when the government could longer afford the freebies.
 
I would hardly calls those countries having "efficient" healthcare.

The whole point against socialism and communism is because it is inefficient. Ever look at the pros and cons of Capitalism and Communism?.... it's the same for socialism and whenever the government funds something instead of the market.

Universal healthcare provides the greatest quality health care for the greatest number of people at the lowest cost. How is our system that provides a lower quality of healthcare for 1/6 of our population at the greatest cost in the world, more efficient?
 
So you have determined that most of the free world are socialists, is that your position?

'The following list of countries are the majority of those that are called “free-market countries” or “industrialized countries”. The OECD (explained below) is an excellent source of statistical information about the 31 countries. OECD is based on countries with a market-oriented ideology. Twenty-seven are high-income countries. Among the 31 countries that are referenced at this website, most of them have some form of “health care for all”, as per the many implementations of health-care-for-all systems. Everybody In. Nobody Out. It is time for the U.S. to stop bureaucracy, start efficiency, and catch up to the rest of the world when it comes to being efficient in paying for health care.

Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Korea (South)
Luxembourg
(Mexico)
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
(Poland)
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
(Turkey)
United Kingdom


FYI: in some years additional countries are added to the OECD organization. For example, three were added during the year 2010: Chile, Estonia, and Slovenia."
Medicare for All: List of Industrialized Countries





A working parent sounds better to me than a family on welfare. This is not a socialist view, it is a long-term view of what is best for our country's future.

India joins list of 135 countries in making education a right

WOW! look at all those choices you have. Are you packing yet? :)
Sorry, but America is an exceptional country, not a socialist one. Besides didn't anyone ever tell you it doesn't work? Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples money.
 
Not everyone. and if you take too much from people who do, they'll either stop making as much (why bother) or find ways to avoid taxes.
Then we'll have riots like Greece when the government could longer afford the freebies.

Please reference your source for this happening during the half century of our history when the tax rates for the wealthy were triple what they are now?
 
Please reference your source for this happening during the half century of our history when the tax rates for the wealthy were triple what they are now?

Since the tax rate affected a different bracket and we aren't in 1950 anymore good luck with this argument.
 
Universal healthcare provides the greatest quality health care for the greatest number of people at the lowest cost. How is our system that provides a lower quality of healthcare for 1/6 of our population at the greatest cost in the world, more efficient?

Lowest cost. :D Another good luck with that argument.
 
WOW! look at all those choices you have. Are you packing yet? :)
Sorry, but America is an exceptional country, not a socialist one. Besides didn't anyone ever tell you it doesn't work? Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples money.

America, love it or leave it? That's your policy? No thank you Barb, I prefer to do my duty to make our country the best it can be rather than see it slide into just another third world country. If you think America is socialist now than you must think our forefathers of the last 80 years were communist, since they charged the wealthy 3 times in taxes what we are today. You must operate under the TurtleDude economic ideology scale as illustrated below:

tdgraph.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom