Does the Democrat Party now have its very own KGB?

[vegas giants]

Only a Mad Lib would believe that all arguments all won by citing trivia, which is all this is.

Yes, for once there’s some legitimate irony in Trump’s enemies turning one of the bills he signed against him. I had to question Checkerboard’s statement because most Mad Libs are completely tone-deaf to both humor and irony. I guess even a stopped clock, etc.

So far no one has refuted any argument I’ve made on this thread. Give it a try; Mad Libs may not be able to come up with humor other than “orange man bad,” but you’re always funny without meaning to be.

What's a mad lib? Is it some group of Americans you are trying to insult because you can't debate the issues? Lol

Dismissed

 

[Ouroboros]

If our arguments were not supported by facts, we would not make them. Example, is there any federal agency Trump has not shitstained?

2020 dismissal of inspectors general​

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › 2020_dismissal_of...
In April and May 2020, United States President Donald Trump dismissed the inspectors general (IGs) of five cabinet departments in the space of six weeks. … See more

Joseph Cuffari - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

DHS Inspector General​

..nominated by Donald Trump .. as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General (IG) on July 25, 2019. ..

Cuffari rejected his staff's recommendation to investigate.. the forcible clearing of protesters from Lafayette Square .. in June 2020.

Cuffari also sought to limit the scope of the investigation into the spread of COVID-19 within the Secret Service, which had been attributed to the Trump Re-Election Campaign not following COVID guidelines. It was later reported that 881 employees of the Secret Service had been infected with COVID, more than 11% of the agency.

Following Brian Murphy's September 2020 whistleblower complaint about Chad Wolf, Ken Cuccinelli, and Kirstjen Nielsen politicizing Department of Homeland Security assets to support the views of both Stephen Miller and Donald Trump, Cuffari began his inspector general (IG) investigation into alleged misconduct at Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after the November 2020 elections. The DHS Office of Intelligence & Analysis released no "intelligence products specific for the January 6", 2021 attack on the capitol. On April 27, 2021, Brian Volsky, the former head of the DHS inspector general's whistleblower protection unit, filed a memo with CIGIE accusing Cuffari .. of mishandling Brian Murphy's complaints.

In December 2021 Cuffari's office learned that Secret Service text messages from the time of the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 had been deleted. Staff members of his office planned to contact the respective offices, collect the phones and use data recovery specialists to try to recover the messages. However, Cuffari decided not to review any of the phones. ... text messages of former acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf and acting DHS Deputy Ken Cuccinelli were lost in a reset after they left the DHS. He did not investigate the deletion of these records.

Anthony Ornato - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Anthony M. Ornato ..headed the security detail of president Donald Trump until taking a leave of absence when the president named him [URL='

Please post comparable examples of Biden, "shitting up" the executive branch!

Who’s the source of the interpretation that the Inspectors were fired for not towing the political line? Could it be... MAD LIBS??

Biden turning into the DOJ into the Woke Brigade is a pretty good start. Yeah, lots of white supremacy terror cells being covered up by disgruntled parents.

 

[Ouroboros]

What's a mad lib? Is it some group of Americans you are trying to insult because you can't debate the issues? Lol

Dismissed

Bye; don’t let the door etc.

 

[vegas giants]

Bye; don’t let the door etc.

I accept your concession


Cya

 

[Ouroboros]

So DT has denied that there were any atomic secrets in the documents he possessed. So if the FBI can’t produce any such documents after their exhaustive search, that makes it likely that the whole “Atomic Secret Narrative” is just a new iteration of the “Russia Russia Russia” hoax. The Dems know that most Libs will slavishly believe any lie that disparages Trump and not ask questions. Always hilarious seeing Mad Libs represent themselves as possessed of deep discriminatory powers.

 

[vegas giants]

If Trump had top secrets documents at his house then this warrant was worth it

You don't store top secrets documents in a personal home for over a year

 

[Ouroboros]

Who was the original source for the Atomic Secrets Narrative? Anyone know? Oh, was it those naughty anonymous sources? Those darn scamps!

 

[Candyman]

Yes. And after reading your OP they are definitely coming after you.

 

[Eurotrash]

That's because wealthy corps are big donors to political parties, not because it is the will of the people.

Exactly. It's not the people who are compromising. It's the politicians, who have sold their souls to their donors. I'm talking RepubliCONs AND Democrats.

 

[Nickyjo]

You’re welcome to believe the Garland rationale. I think the fishing explanation makes more sense, particularly since the FBI has not charged DT with the “felony” all the Mad Libs think a slam dunk.

F

So DT has denied that there were any atomic secrets in the documents he possessed. So if the FBI can’t produce any such documents after their exhaustive search, that makes it likely that the whole “Atomic Secret Narrative” is just a new iteration of the “Russia Russia Russia” hoax. The Dems know that most Libs will slavishly believe any lie that disparages Trump and not ask questions. Always hilarious seeing Mad Libs represent themselves as possessed of deep discriminatory powers.

Face the simple truths in this case. This is what we know now: 1- Trump should not have taken those documents, whether or not they contained nuclear data, and he has offered no explanation for taking them as yet; 2- He was asked for them in the spring, and a subpoena was issued; 3- He didn't turn them over; 4- The authorities did what they would have done with you or me, went and got them; 5- Trump, not the FBI, revealed that they had visited and searched, (and Trump has the material he wants released in the form of the warrant, so has no call to ask that it be released.)

I repeat, that there is no need to lie about Trump, no need to believe any lie. He provides all the damaging information about himself willingly. Anyone who makes up stuff about him is a fool. And really, you blame Dems for being naive? It was Trump himself who disparaged his supporters with his comment that they wouldn't mind if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.

 

[Ouroboros]

F

Face the simple truths in this case. This is what we know now: 1- Trump should not have taken those documents, whether or not they contained nuclear data, and he has offered no explanation for taking them as yet; 2- He was asked for them in the spring, and a subpoena was issued; 3- He didn't turn them over; 4- The authorities did what they would have done with you or me, went and got them; 5- Trump, not the FBI, revealed that they had visited and searched, (and Trump has the material he wants released in the form of the warrant, so has no call to ask that it be released.)

I repeat, that there is no need to lie about Trump, no need to believe any lie. He provides all the damaging information about himself willingly. Anyone who makes up stuff about him is a fool. And really, you blame Dems for being naive? It was Trump himself who disparaged his supporters with his comment that they wouldn't mind if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.

The warrant has not been unsealed yet, according to this post from three hours ago. This and other articles have pointed out that Trump's legal team could move to block the warrant's release, but not until it's unsealed.

Liberals really don't understand hyperbole in any form, do they? Not unless it's "save the planet from Evil Oil Barons!"

 

[EdwinWillers]

Donald Trump should scare every American.

Well, he scares every radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist and DNC operative - along with a bunch of weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINOs.

That's good enough for me.

 

[Pound4abrown]

No.
And this is a ****ing stupid partisan poll.

 

[Noodlegawd]

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

How would you know if they're "baseless"?

 

[Nickyjo]

The warrant has not been unsealed yet, according to this post from three hours ago. This and other articles have pointed out that Trump's legal team could move to block the warrant's release, but not until it's unsealed.

Liberals really don't understand hyperbole in any form, do they? Not unless it's "save the planet from Evil Oil Barons!"

Apparently, FYI, Fox has obtained all or part of the warrant, but their reporting so far has been unclear as to what was in it. Question remains, it seems, whether Trump made attempts to declassify any of the sensitive stuff.

But I don't understand your post. Do you challenge the points I made about what we now know?

 

[noonereal]

Trump supporter tears are delicious . Keep the whining coming

Law and order is only for non Trumpists I guess.

 

[noonereal]

The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. Right? Right!

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!

 

[Ginger Ale]

Well, he scares every radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist and DNC operative - along with a bunch of weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINOs.

That's good enough for me.

That's everyone else but a MAGA freak.

It's literally come down to the Trump party, or everyone else. The Trump party have totally isolated themselves from all other citizens of this country.

What about that is appealing to you? You can't win general elections with those numbers, only primaries. Is that enough to satisfy the T-Party?

 

[EdwinWillers]

Well, he scares every radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist and DNC operative - along with a bunch of weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINOs.

That's good enough for me.

That's everyone else but a MAGA freak.

It's literally come down to the Trump party, or everyone else. The Trump party have totally isolated themselves from all other citizens of this country.

What about that is appealing to you? You can't win general elections with those numbers, only primaries. Is that enough to satisfy the T-Party?

Think about what you just said...

Anyone who isn't a radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist, DNC operative, or a weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINO is a "MAGA freak."

...and you want to know what about that is appealing to me???

Let me put it this way:
I am not a radical leftist
I am not a communist
I am not a statist
I am not a collectivist
I am certainly not a DNC operative and,
I am definitely not a weak-kneed, limp-wristed Republican in Name Only.

If all that's left from that list are "MAGA freaks" - then AMEN BROTHER!

 

[Slartibartfast]

Think about what you just said...

Anyone who isn't a radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist, DNC operative, or a weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINO is a "MAGA freak."

...and you want to know what about that is appealing to me???

Let me put it this way:
I am not a radical leftist
I am not a communist
I am not a statist
I am not a collectivist
I am certainly not a DNC operative and,
I am definitely not a weak-kneed, limp-wristed Republican in Name Only.

If all that's left from that list are "MAGA freaks" - then AMEN BROTHER!

It’s interesting that your world seems to consist of extreme caricatures with no middle ground for normal people.

 

[Phys251]

Think about what you just said...

Anyone who isn't a radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist, DNC operative, or a weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINO is a "MAGA freak."

...and you want to know what about that is appealing to me???

Let me put it this way:
I am not a radical leftist
I am not a communist
I am not a statist
I am not a collectivist
I am certainly not a DNC operative and,
I am definitely not a weak-kneed, limp-wristed Republican in Name Only.

If all that's left from that list are "MAGA freaks" - then AMEN BROTHER!

You picked a very strange moment in history to brag about being in the trump cult.

 

[Ouroboros]

Apparently, FYI, Fox has obtained all or part of the warrant, but their reporting so far has been unclear as to what was in it. Question remains, it seems, whether Trump made attempts to declassify any of the sensitive stuff.

But I don't understand your post. Do you challenge the points I made about what we now know?

At present, until I read a decisive interpretation of the law on unsealing warrants, the points with which I disagree are (1) we don't know if it's entirely inappropriate for Presidents to take documents with them, since I've heard the same charge leveled at Obama and Bill Clinton, and (2) I don't think there's any deep meaning to Trump saying his followers would overlook his shooting someone in front of witnesses.

 

[CaughtInThe]

The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. Right? Right!

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!

hey. great thread.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!! RADICAL LEFTISTS!!!

----What is WRONG with you?
Trump hand picked FBI director.
Trump hand picked judge.

Justify your nonsensical spew for ONCE in your life.

 

[Ginger Ale]

Think about what you just said...

Anyone who isn't a radical leftist, communist, statist, collectivist, DNC operative, or a weak-kneed, limp-wristed RINO is a "MAGA freak."

...and you want to know what about that is appealing to me???

Let me put it this way:
I am not a radical leftist
I am not a communist
I am not a statist
I am not a collectivist
I am certainly not a DNC operative and,
I am definitely not a weak-kneed, limp-wristed Republican in Name Only.

If all that's left from that list are "MAGA freaks" - then AMEN BROTHER!

Nice spin, but I clarified and you ignored. I do believe you were selective on purpose but hey, I can just re post what I said.



"It's literally come down to the Trump party, or everyone else. The Trump party have totally isolated themselves from all other citizens of this country."

You're either MAGA, or you're not. You got 30% to work with in the generals, vote your heart out! Won't make a shred of difference.