• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does the Democrat Party now have its very own KGB?

Does the Democrat Party officially have its very own KGB?

  • Based on the facts; definitely No!

    Votes: 51 73.9%

  • Based on the facts; obviously Yes!

    Votes: 17 24.6%

  • I'll let you know after I've dissected the facts!

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Total voters
    69
Empirica

Empirica

~Transcend~
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2011
Messages
4,682
Reaction score
1,905
Location
Lost at sea~
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
 
Trump handpicked the Director of the FBI. If he was a Democratic sleeper agent, then Trump didn't hire the best people. :LOL:

1660030841424.png
 
Last edited:
I find it laughable that you claim outrage over this considering the abuses that Trump wanted to do to his political enemies using the DOJ and other security agencies as well as to muzzle the press.
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
Do you support investigations of all second and third trimester miscarriages? If yes, who should lead them, police, prosecutors? How physically invasive do such investigations have to be to be effective? Should females connected with G.O.P. politicians be investigated less intensively than other women who have miscarried?
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
You have provided no evidence to support your claims.

I am not 100% sure, but it appears you are claiming that the FBI somehow convinced a judge to issue an unjustified warrant for purposes of searching Mar-A-Lago.

This claim requires supporting evidence.



It seems far more likely that they had a legitimate reason to search Mar-A-Lago.
 
The Mark said:
You have provided no evidence to support your claims.

I am not 100% sure, but it appears you are claiming that the FBI somehow convinced a judge to issue an unjustified warrant for purposes of searching Mar-A-Lago.

This claim requires supporting evidence.



It seems far more likely that they had a legitimate reason to search Mar-A-Lago.
Click to expand...
Wait for the investigation then. Like the last time the FBI fabricated evidence to obtain a search warrant for political purposes. Russian hoax. MAL hoax.
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
Click to expand...
Every time someone say "obviously," what follows is a lie.
Empirica said:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
There have been dozens of convictions in a court of law, by a jury of their peers of dozens of Trump administration officials for real crimes. Why do you think they should be able to commit crimes without consequence?
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!đź‘Ť
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...

If they do, it's run by a member of the opposition party, which would be a very neat trick.
 
Get with the times. There's been no KGB in Russia for 30 yrs. Russia's federal security service is now the FSB. Rep/cons just can't get their facts straight.
 
Mycroft said:
Party membership is irrelevant in the DC swamp.
Click to expand...
Exactly, which is why politicians should be investigated and prosecuted when they commit crimes and not be covered by a friendly administration. Glad to see we're on the same page for once.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Exactly, which is why politicians should be investigated and prosecuted when they commit crimes and not be covered by a friendly administration. Glad to see we're on the same page for once.
Click to expand...
Politicians should NOT be persecuted by the party in control, either. But that's the way our corrupt seat of government operates.
 
Mycroft said:
Politicians should NOT be persecuted by the party in control, either. But that's the way our corrupt seat of government operates.
Click to expand...
So you're saying any ex-president can commit any number of crimes and they can never be tried for anything? Where did that come from? Do presidents have a right to take any classified documents they want home with them when they leave office? When has that EVER been the case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom