- Joined
- Jul 31, 2005
- Messages
- 36,705
- Reaction score
- 17,867
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Re: Do You SUpport the DREAM Act?
I have offered realistic solution many times.Many of which Oklahoma and Arizona have done like denying tax payer funded services and benifits to illegals, requiring police to verify the legal status of those they arrest and several other thing. There is no reason for any form of amnesty.
I seen the game you phonies like to play. You sit there and claim you are against illegal immigration.While at the same time pretend that the only solution the anti-illegal immigration side has to offer is mass round ups and deportation, as though we are somehow even incapable of that and the only solution is amnesty, or making it totally easy for companies to import foreign workers(Bill O'Reilly does thing too).
Anyone who is against illegal immigration knows that you do not reward illegal immigration with amnesty or some form of it. Because all it does is encourage more illegal immigration. We do not want more illegal immigration, that's the whole point of being opposed to illegal immigration in the first place. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out, just common sense. Amnesty for illegal immigration makes as much sense as saying lets murderers off the hook to solve the murder problem, or lets pay off everybody's traffic and parking fines to solve the problem of people not paying their traffic and parking fines. So what the feds have refused to do their job and practically encouraged illegal immigration, This is why states must step in just like Oklahoma and Arizona did since it is a state and local problem. Illegals will either go back to their country or flee to the sanctuary states thus worsening their illegal immigration problem.
What about those of us that are ANTI-illegal but want to see a real solution as opposed to being a part of some other anti-illegal group of impotent raging ideologues gathered in a desperate limp circle jerk bound for no conclusion?
I have offered realistic solution many times.Many of which Oklahoma and Arizona have done like denying tax payer funded services and benifits to illegals, requiring police to verify the legal status of those they arrest and several other thing. There is no reason for any form of amnesty.
I seen the game you phonies like to play. You sit there and claim you are against illegal immigration.While at the same time pretend that the only solution the anti-illegal immigration side has to offer is mass round ups and deportation, as though we are somehow even incapable of that and the only solution is amnesty, or making it totally easy for companies to import foreign workers(Bill O'Reilly does thing too).
Anyone who is against illegal immigration knows that you do not reward illegal immigration with amnesty or some form of it. Because all it does is encourage more illegal immigration. We do not want more illegal immigration, that's the whole point of being opposed to illegal immigration in the first place. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out, just common sense. Amnesty for illegal immigration makes as much sense as saying lets murderers off the hook to solve the murder problem, or lets pay off everybody's traffic and parking fines to solve the problem of people not paying their traffic and parking fines. So what the feds have refused to do their job and practically encouraged illegal immigration, This is why states must step in just like Oklahoma and Arizona did since it is a state and local problem. Illegals will either go back to their country or flee to the sanctuary states thus worsening their illegal immigration problem.