Do you need an AR15 to protest?

[Bodi]

Probably because there is some irrational ordinance or legislation that prevents them from doing so .. it's California.

I don't know about that... HB is a surf town... it is really chill. Surfing. Fish tacos. It is also a major spot for street racing. Guns? Not so much.

 

[Bodi]

Why would anyone protest against a simple system set up to protect people from disease?

They are protesting because Orange Country was singled out as the only county where beaches were going to be shut down to the public. Our 43 miles of beach were it out of however many hundreds of miles there are.

 

[Bodi]

People have training as wel

Yep. My brother had his gun down at the beach today. He has a conceal carry permit.

 

[Jason Warfield]

If you are protesting and doing it peacefully, then you do not need an AR-15 or any firearm.

When you do, you are knowingly causing intimidation. And many of you, who claim to love America and freedom seem to not understand that you are using the tactics that communists, terrorists and tyrants use.

If you feel the need to show up to protest your point with a firearm in full view, you know for a fact that you are causing intimidation, that makes you a coward and a bully. Remember how intimidated and scared you felt when you demanded that something be done about the new Black Panthers as they marched outside of polling places, claiming that they were using intimidation to keep people away? Well...this is the same thing.

And don't give me the power of the people crap...you already have that power when you vote. And the only people you represent are the bullies and the cowards, the communists and terrorists and the tyrants who use intimidation through firearms to achieve what they want...not by going about it the way a free people would.

I think the 2nd Amendment should be protected. I think that CCW laws are just fine. But it's a$$hats like you guys that make politicians want to practice greater gun control. Just like when Ronald Reagan as governor of CA and the CA Republicans passed the Panther Bill that banned open carry in CA because they walked into the state capitol with firearms and intimidated the state legislature.

 

[BahamaBob]

If you are protesting and doing it peacefully, then you do not need an AR-15 or any firearm.

When you do, you are knowingly causing intimidation. And many of you, who claim to love America and freedom seem to not understand that you are using the tactics that communists, terrorists and tyrants use.

If you feel the need to show up to protest your point with a firearm in full view, you know for a fact that you are causing intimidation, that makes you a coward and a bully. Remember how intimidated and scared you felt when you demanded that something be done about the new Black Panthers as they marched outside of polling places, claiming that they were using intimidation to keep people away? Well...this is the same thing.

And don't give me the power of the people crap...you already have that power when you vote. And the only people you represent are the bullies and the cowards, the communists and terrorists and the tyrants who use intimidation through firearms to achieve what they want...not by going about it the way a free people would.

I think the 2nd Amendment should be protected. I think that CCW laws are just fine. But it's a$$hats like you guys that make politicians want to practice greater gun control. Just like when Ronald Reagan as governor of CA and the CA Republicans passed the Panther Bill that banned open carry in CA because they walked into the state capitol with firearms and intimidated the state legislature.

Some people are easily intimidated. If things scare you that is your problem. People intimidated by guns, people intimidated by back men, people intimidated by assertive women, on and on. Just people with irrational fears who want a big brother government to protect them from their fears.

 

[Luther]

People protesting social distancing at Huntington Beach in California aren't armed with AR15's.

And yet, somehow, they are still protesting.

Yeah, but you forgot that they can't have a AR-15 out in the open in Calif swingman

 

[ALiberalModerate]

I'm sorry - not meaning to fat shame here, but pretty much everyone of those people has a belly. Every one. :lol:

Which is very odd, because that is usually the type you see that choose to protest while openly carrying.

 

[bearpoker]

In California, they are using the CHP as their goon squad.

BTW, Newsom is on the run, by day’s end he will have folded to “social distance might still be enforced now, please stop being mean to me!”

The two in front that I can see don't seem to be missing any groceries. I can't tell about the rest of them, though.

 

[bearpoker]

Here is a better question: Armed or unarmed, why do you "need" to protest at all?

It's their right to protest. Whether or not they do it in a responsible manner is the issue.

 

[Luther]

The two in front that I can see don't seem to be missing any groceries. I can't tell about the rest of them, though.

Wow!

I mean judging someone by how they look?

 

[The AntiDonald]

People protesting social distancing at Huntington Beach in California aren't armed with AR15's.

And yet, somehow, they are still protesting.

That's because most of them are democrats. It's only the thug conservative Trump supporters that seem to have to hide behind their assault rifles.

 

[jamesrage]

People protesting social distancing at Huntington Beach in California aren't armed with AR15's.

And yet, somehow, they are still protesting.

No more than you need a sign to protest. There is no "one at a time" clause in the bill of rights. If I want to protest, carry a gun and be a member of a church then I can do so. The 1st and 2nd amendments allows people protest and carry guns on them. Just because some dickless fake men and little girls are upset at the sight of a gun doesn't mean you should consider their feelings when you protest. If a dirty anti-American piece of **** can burn a flag and it be considered speech then a pro-American can most certainly carry a gun while protesting at the same time and it be considered speech.

 

[calamity]

No more than you need a sign to protest. There is no "one at a time" clause in the bill of rights. If I want to protest, carry a gun and be a member of a church then I can do so. The 1st and 2nd amendments allows people protest and carry guns on them. Just because some dickless fake men and little girls are upset at the sight of a gun doesn't mean you should consider their feelings when you protest. If a dirty anti-American piece of **** can burn a flag and it be considered speech then a pro-American can most certainly carry a gun while protesting at the same time and it be considered speech.

I'm only saying that if the cops start mowing those armed ****ers down, they have my full support.

 

[Josie]

I'm sorry - not meaning to fat shame here, but pretty much everyone of those people has a belly. Every one. :lol:

So you do mean to fat shame.

 

[Josie]

I'm only saying that if the cops start mowing those armed ****ers down, they have my full support.

How very Fascist of you. Should they hang up their bodies in the center of town also?

 

[zimmer]

Not having a tiny penis, I do not need an AR-15 at all.

But it would be a great tool to have when someone seeks to do harm to you.

Not having a penis and no AR15 makes you one of the more vulnerable in society... and extremely so depending on where you live.

 

[ataraxia]

shrug...

Some people need guns, some people need bicycle locks.

The question is...were they actually used.

I want to walk around protests pulling a nuclear ordnance on my kid’s Radio Flyer wagon. Hey, I won’t use it. It’s just what I like to do at protests. What’s the problem?

 

[Mycroft]

I want to walk around protests pulling a nuclear ordnance on my kid’s Radio Flyer wagon. Hey, I won’t use it. It’s just what I like to do at protests. What’s the problem?

Hyperbole is not a good debate tactic.

You are dismissed. (see my sig)

 

[avatar]

I'd vote no. The presence of an AR-15 with you during a protest makes your views look foolish.

 

[swing_voter]

But it would be a great tool to have when someone seeks to do harm to you.

Not having a penis and no AR15 makes you one of the more vulnerable in society... and extremely so depending on where you live.

Girls don't have penises. They can still shoot you.

 

[Superfly]

Not only would they get crushed again, it would usher in a wave of political progressivism that has not been seen since...the Civil War.

The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were the most progressive back-to-back-to-back amendments since the Bill of Rights. None of them could have passed had the Southern states gotten in the way.

Nope. Lots of things would be different today.

 

[jamesrage]

I'm only saying that if the cops start mowing those armed ****ers down, they have my full support.

I am sure your anti-2nd amendment trash and other anti-constitutional trash brethren would agree with you. People like you are an enemy of freedom.

 

[calamity]

I am sure your anti-2nd amendment trash and other anti-constitutional trash brethren would agree with you. People like you are an enemy of freedom.

No, angry people holding assault rifles are a threat. I'd shoot one in a heartbeat if he dared to approach my house.

"Look, officer. He came with a gun."

 

[apdst]

People protesting social distancing at Huntington Beach in California aren't armed with AR15's.

And yet, somehow, they are still protesting.

Yes...

 

[apdst]

Why would anyone protest against a simple system set up to protect people from disease?

Outlawing fishing won't protect anyone from getting the kung flu.